...at the end of the Belk Bowl. No call on deep ball interference. Who cares. I'll never bemoan an A&M jobbing after our last B12 game. Screw 'em.
A&M Jobbed...
- Thread starter Bremser_rivals74172
- Start date
Ball was over the receivers head before contact happened. It was a perfect no-call. If the ball was actually catchable the contact and the touch of the ball would have happened at the same time.
Last edited:
Not so sure. When you get tackled before the ball arrives, it is difficult to call a ball that close non catch-able. ...enjoyed watching it, just the same.
Guilt by affiliation. Oh...and the nut sack grab. The sack grab put me over the top.
That was too close to call it uncatchable. That was one of the few plays I watched of that game but don't recall the official giving the uncatchable signal which would mean he thought the contact was OK. If it would have happened to the Huskers we would fill ten pages of comments on here about firing the officials.
I agree with the OP. Screw TA&M and the SEC.
There are bad calls every game in every quarter by the refs. Not a game goes by where there isn't a call that is complained about.
Whether or not this call was bad, it happens and I am glad it happened to an SEC team. I didn't watch the whole game, but odds are that WF had a bad call or no-call go against them somewhere in the game.
If TA&M doesn't like it, maybe they shouldn't have let WF score so many damn points.
There are bad calls every game in every quarter by the refs. Not a game goes by where there isn't a call that is complained about.
Whether or not this call was bad, it happens and I am glad it happened to an SEC team. I didn't watch the whole game, but odds are that WF had a bad call or no-call go against them somewhere in the game.
If TA&M doesn't like it, maybe they shouldn't have let WF score so many damn points.
The bottom line is with or without contact that ball wasn't going to be caught. No reason to reward them with a penalty