38% check this poll out..............

[jtturner09]

for those of you who give such credence to a poll who only talked to 1500 people, here is one that over 400,000 responded to https://www.newsmax.com/Surveys/Results/id/363/

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

Newsmax?

LMAO!

 

[jtturner09]

Newsmax?

LMAO!

just pointing out 1500 is not an adequate number to make any assumptions on

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

just pointing out 1500 is not an adequate number to make any assumptions on

Take probability and statistics and learn about sampling size and representation and then you can talk to us about 1500 being or not being an appropriate sample size.

 

[dave]

Take probability and statistics and learn about sampling size and representation and then you can talk to us about 1500 being or not being an appropriate sample size.

Or just look at the 2016 election and learn what happens when you get duped by warped sample sizes.

 

[RichardPeterJohnson]

Or just look at the 2016 election and learn what happens when you get duped by warped sample sizes.

Polls were correct. Hillary got 3 million more votes. Polls were within margin of rrror. You can look it up.

 

[jtturner09]

Take probability and statistics and learn about sampling size and representation and then you can talk to us about 1500 being or not being an appropriate sample size.

according to gallup he has gained 3 points http://news.gallup.com/poll/189299/...ICS&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles#pcf-image

 

[WVU82_rivals]

38% of the idiots inside the media bubble would vote for Trump.

100% of those that voted for Trump in 2016 will vote for him in 2020.

 

[dave]

Polls were correct. Hillary got 3 million more votes. Polls were within margin of rrror. You can look it up.

This is false. Within 2 weeks of the election polls had her up double digits. They always correct the last days to save face but they were not correct.

 

[RichardPeterJohnson]

This is false. Within 2 weeks of the election polls had her up double digits. They always correct the last days to save face but they were not correct.

Wrong again. Way wrong.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/national-polls/

 

[bamaEER]

Wrong again. Way wrong.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/national-polls/

He must be new. And I doubt he took any statistics classes ever.

 

[WVU82_rivals]

538 had hilliary up 86 to 14 a year ago today..

 

[dave]

Wrong again. Way wrong.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/national-polls/

It is almost like people could never remember what happened a year ago.

 

[dave]

He must be new. And I doubt he took any statistics classes ever.

I bet I took a lot more statistics than you did.

 

[dave]

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58112308e4b064e1b4b05ce5

 

[dave]

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...on-donald-trump-presidential-polls/index.html

 

[dave]

https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN12T0J6

 

[dave]

That is 3 polls within 2 weeks of the election. Tell me I am wrong again. Maybe bamadumbass can make another prediction?

 

[countryroads89_rivals]

He must be new. And I doubt he took any statistics classes ever.

Just like he pretended to be an engineer.

 

[Mntneer]

Polls were correct. Hillary got 3 million more votes. Polls were within margin of rrror. You can look it up.

You got Nate Silver.

[laughing]

 

[dave]

Just like he pretended to be an engineer.

The only person on this forum that talks about me being an engineer is you cunty.

 

[atlkvb]

Polls were correct. Hillary got 3 million more votes. Polls were within margin of rrror. You can look it up.

Polls were wrong. Hillary lost! If the polls were within the margin of error their margins were in error because none of their margins had Trump winning.

Had to be Russians messing up the margins.