Perhaps, to be impartial, these basketball "experts" could also share some thoughts on the efficiency of the offense, effectiveness of in-bounds plays, development of players, dependence on athletic players with low level of basketball skills, roster turnover, ineffective nonsensical substitutions, continual reliance on freshman, ineffective use of incoming transfers that have proven to be effective elsewhere, disparate treatment of 5stars vs other players, etc, etc. No, its just must easier for the lazy to flippantly attack an "entitled" fan base. BS, we aren't entitled to anything in sports, or life for that matter. We do, however, have interest, passion, and opinions based on the multi-year deterioration we see with our own eyes. Why aren't they asking why $9 million isn't buying someone that can actually coach up the current team, which doesn't happen to possess superior talent?