The Tennessee Holler (@thetnholler.bsky.social)
💔 https://www.thebulwark.com/p/he-lived-here-for-35-years-put-three-kids-in-college-ice-killed-jim-lorenzo-salgado-araujo
bsky.app
2026 SS Gestapo ICE
- Thread starter RoseBowlorBust
- Start date
bsky.app
‘He did not deserve to die’: family of man fatally shot by ICE agent speaks out
Lorenzo Salgado Araujo was killed by agent in Texas while on his way to work, and family found out from news reports
www.theguardian.com
Senator Patty Murray (@murray.senate.gov)
A man with NO criminal history was shot and killed by ICE. As far as I'm concerned, Trump's DHS Secretary should get hauled in front of Congress to answer for every shooting. We need a Congressional majority that will push for real answers and accountability. This cannot stand...
bsky.app
The scary part is he's basically built his own army that are willing to kill for him and we are forced to fund them. In the Fore Fathers thread, they'd have been willing to die to stop that from happening. In fact, many did in Revolutionary War.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social)
ICE’s Camp East Montana is a hellhole. It’s been open less than a year and three people have died there, including the first-ever homicide in ICE detention (allegedly at the hands of guards). Both DHS and Congressional watchdogs have documented extensive problems. Shut it down! [contains quote...
bsky.app
Marisa Kabas (@marisakabas.bsky.social)
ICE has killed another person, this time by depriving him of life-sustaining medication for a known medical condition. Jesus Manuel Arenas-Silva was detained on Thursday. He was dead by Monday. Per @detentionwatchnetwork.org:
bsky.app
We are currently in one of the darkest periods in American history.
ALL BECAUSE OF ONE PERSON
ALL BECAUSE OF ONE PERSON
How do you propose the government go about removing the illegal immigrants?The Tennessee Holler (@thetnholler.bsky.social)
💔 https://www.thebulwark.com/p/he-lived-here-for-35-years-put-three-kids-in-college-ice-killed-jim-lorenzo-salgado-araujo
I can agree with that, but don’t think they have the same rights as a US Citizen?
By throwing as much money as possible at the situation while simultaneously suspending constitutional rights and breaking every possible law along the way.
The long term solution is pretty obvious and simple. If an illegal is caught working for a US based company, we arrest ownership, seize the assets, shut it completely down. That would stop the labor demand immediately IMO.
We, of course, don't really want to fix the issue. Way more useful to pretend we GaF and use it as a political football.
What is the current penalty for hiring an illegal? In SC we require that all employers perform an E-verify when hiring someone. It seems that our state cares about the issue.
Hey Chis, it turns out the guy you started this thread for was a drug dealer illegal alien with multiple baggies of methamphetamine in the car he used to try and drive over the ice officer.
Any follow up with that in mind? Why do all of these examples you leftists bring up turn out to be the worst people society has to offer? Thank you ICE for removing this criminal from the board!
Any follow up with that in mind? Why do all of these examples you leftists bring up turn out to be the worst people society has to offer? Thank you ICE for removing this criminal from the board!
Hows about you tell me. Clearly E-verify is working perfectly! Not a single brown person has ever worked in SC to my knowledge.
We have employed brown people for quite awhile here. Why don’t blue states make everify law?
Assume because it doesn't work based on your first sentence. I live in a red state as well. You are gonna have to find a libtard to educate you.
Endless theater from grandpa ain't gonna fix anything. I can guarantee you that.
Naturalize them. They’re waaaay better citizens than mediocre, racist white dudes.
why would the people who get elected screaming about immigration want to solve immigration?
telltale sign: when biden was president - and there was not shot at getting it signed - GOP presented an immigration reform bill. now that trump is president and GOP control both houses - no legislation proposed other than funding. everything is done through executive order. that's by design. the GOP "solution" to immigration makes it imperative they stay in power (from their perspective), which maintains immigration as a key campaign issue
personally, i want a legislative approach specifically so we don't get these wild swings in enforcement, president to president. set up a system that actually functions and everyone knows what the expectations and opportunities are.
These wild swings wouldn't happen if current law was simply enforced as intended, and in a consistent manner...
I have always wanted to know where they pull these “x amount of undocumented” immigrant numbers from. Stephen Miller’s bunghole?
Asking for @JohnHughsPartner (fapping material).
What is the current penalty in SC if you are so up on the law?
Did they know he was a drug dealer before they shot him?
Because if not, then it is immaterial to the fact that they shot him.
Also, being a drug dealer is not punishable by death, so there is that.
They also had a bipartisan bill ready to pass but Mango Mussolini ordered the beta cucks to kill it so he could campaign on the issue. That doesn’t excuse the border failure of the Biden administration, but it does aptly demonstrate Trump doesn’t give an actual sh*t about any issue that doesn’t serve him.
I mean, JFC, Trump recently managed to make a speech at someone else’s funeral almost entirely about Trump. Let that sink in.
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Episode Title: "Gestapo on the Half-Shell: Shadows in the Sewer of 2026"The Turtles are in their lair watching hacked news feeds about aggressive ICE enforcement in 2026. Master Splinter meditates while the team argues over immigration, due process, rule of law, media narratives, and political incentives. Pizza is involved. Each Turtle (and ally) maps to a key poster from the thread.Character Assignments & Psychological BreakdownsRoseBowlorBust = April O'Neil (the passionate investigative reporter)
April storms in with a flood of BlueSky links, Guardian articles, and emotional family stories about ICE shootings and detention center deaths, framing enforcement as systemic overreach ("Gestapo"). She starts the whole frenzy.
Psychological breakdown: Strong empathy-driven activism paired with confirmation bias. April/Rosebowl selects and amplifies cases that fit a narrative of cruelty, sometimes without full context. In one prominent example, the individual turned out to have a criminal background involving methamphetamine and an alleged attempt to assault an officer—facts that undermined the initial sympathetic portrayal. This reflects "outrage journalism" psychology: rapid sharing for moral impact, slower correction when details complicate the story. It provides purpose and community validation but risks distorting overall reality.
on3.com
Scrubby = Raphael (the hot-headed, sarcastic enforcer)
Raph jumps in swinging, sarcastically dismantling the sob stories by revealing criminal details (drug dealer with meth who tried to run over the agent) and praising ICE for removing threats. “Thank you ICE!”
Psychological breakdown: Retributive justice orientation with low tolerance for perceived hypocrisy or selective empathy. Raph/Scrubby prioritizes public safety and law enforcement, using sharp sarcasm to puncture emotional appeals. Strengths include quick reality-testing and defense of order. Risks include appearing callous, which escalates tribal flames instead of bridging gaps.
Anon1750875978 = Michelangelo (the dramatic, hyperbolic party dude in crisis mode)
Mikey wails that this is “one of the darkest periods in American history… ALL BECAUSE OF ONE PERSON.”
Psychological breakdown: Catastrophizing and personalization of politics. This creates emotional catharsis and strong in-group identity by boiling complex issues down to a single villain. It heightens threat perception (useful for mobilization) but reduces nuance, personal agency, and openness to counter-evidence. Classic affective polarization style.
on3.com
lucas80 = Donatello (the witty tech nerd with dry sarcasm)
Donnie drops quips like “Jeffrey Epstein?” in response to the “one person” blame, later getting hit with a Kamala/Rogan counter-joke.
Psychological breakdown: Intellectual detachment via humor and whataboutism. Effective for defusing panic and coping with stress, but can sidestep genuine human costs or deeper policy discussion. High openness paired with contrarian instincts.
on3.com
AlexanderUrinis = Leonardo (the strategic but frustrated leader)
Leo calls out political theater, employer accountability as the real long-term fix, and the futility of endless money + rights-suspension without addressing demand.
Psychological breakdown: Systems-oriented pragmatism with integrative complexity. Sees incentives on multiple sides rather than pure heroes/villains. This leads to balanced critique but frustration when others stay in tribal mode. Represents the “adult in the room” who gets shouted down.
on3.com
kidmike41 = Splinter (the measured sensei)
Splinter calmly asks practical questions: “How do you propose the government go about removing illegal immigrants?” and discusses E-Verify implementation.
Psychological breakdown: Conscientious, rule-oriented, and implementation-focused. Less emotionally reactive, more interested in workable procedures and state-level realities. Provides grounding but often gets lost amid louder voices.
on3.com
Wobmam Rulez! / THE_DEVIL = Casey Jones (the vigilante hothead ally)
Casey rants about “his own army” of agents that taxpayers fund, invoking revolutionary spirit against tyranny.
Psychological breakdown: Anti-authoritarian with romantic revolutionary framing. Hyper-vigilant to concentrated power; channels legitimate oversight concerns but can tilt toward conspiratorial interpretations under emotional stress.
on3.com
TarponSpringsNole = Shredder (the chaotic provocateur)
Shredder drops bombs like “Naturalize them. They’re waaaay better citizens than mediocre, racist white dudes.”
Psychological breakdown: High disagreeableness used for provocation and status-signaling. Maximalist trolling triggers opponents effectively for engagement but destroys constructive dialogue. Pure edgelord energy.
on3.com
jimneffer / Rifler = Foot Clan analysts (cynical institutional observers)
They note that politicians on both sides benefit from keeping immigration broken as a perpetual campaign issue—GOP shifts from reform bills to executive action depending on who holds power.
Psychological breakdown: Public choice realism and institutional cynicism. Accurately diagnoses incentive problems but can foster resignation rather than solutions. Clear-eyed but low on optimism.
on3.com
Episode Arc: April’s initial reports get complicated by counter-facts mid-fight. Raph scores “I told you so” points. Leo pushes for consistent enforcement + legislative fixes. Mikey has an emotional moment. Donnie cracks jokes. They battle Foot Soldiers (bad-faith posts) and ultimately agree the sewer of online discourse needs better context, less outrage farming, and actual policy trade-offs. Pizza heals all.Cowabunga takeaway: Immigration enforcement involves real trade-offs between security, compassion, and incentives. Selective stories and hyperbole make for great thread drama—but cooler heads (and full facts) make better policy.
April storms in with a flood of BlueSky links, Guardian articles, and emotional family stories about ICE shootings and detention center deaths, framing enforcement as systemic overreach ("Gestapo"). She starts the whole frenzy.
Psychological breakdown: Strong empathy-driven activism paired with confirmation bias. April/Rosebowl selects and amplifies cases that fit a narrative of cruelty, sometimes without full context. In one prominent example, the individual turned out to have a criminal background involving methamphetamine and an alleged attempt to assault an officer—facts that undermined the initial sympathetic portrayal. This reflects "outrage journalism" psychology: rapid sharing for moral impact, slower correction when details complicate the story. It provides purpose and community validation but risks distorting overall reality.
on3.com
Scrubby = Raphael (the hot-headed, sarcastic enforcer)
Raph jumps in swinging, sarcastically dismantling the sob stories by revealing criminal details (drug dealer with meth who tried to run over the agent) and praising ICE for removing threats. “Thank you ICE!”
Psychological breakdown: Retributive justice orientation with low tolerance for perceived hypocrisy or selective empathy. Raph/Scrubby prioritizes public safety and law enforcement, using sharp sarcasm to puncture emotional appeals. Strengths include quick reality-testing and defense of order. Risks include appearing callous, which escalates tribal flames instead of bridging gaps.
Anon1750875978 = Michelangelo (the dramatic, hyperbolic party dude in crisis mode)
Mikey wails that this is “one of the darkest periods in American history… ALL BECAUSE OF ONE PERSON.”
Psychological breakdown: Catastrophizing and personalization of politics. This creates emotional catharsis and strong in-group identity by boiling complex issues down to a single villain. It heightens threat perception (useful for mobilization) but reduces nuance, personal agency, and openness to counter-evidence. Classic affective polarization style.
on3.com
lucas80 = Donatello (the witty tech nerd with dry sarcasm)
Donnie drops quips like “Jeffrey Epstein?” in response to the “one person” blame, later getting hit with a Kamala/Rogan counter-joke.
Psychological breakdown: Intellectual detachment via humor and whataboutism. Effective for defusing panic and coping with stress, but can sidestep genuine human costs or deeper policy discussion. High openness paired with contrarian instincts.
on3.com
AlexanderUrinis = Leonardo (the strategic but frustrated leader)
Leo calls out political theater, employer accountability as the real long-term fix, and the futility of endless money + rights-suspension without addressing demand.
Psychological breakdown: Systems-oriented pragmatism with integrative complexity. Sees incentives on multiple sides rather than pure heroes/villains. This leads to balanced critique but frustration when others stay in tribal mode. Represents the “adult in the room” who gets shouted down.
on3.com
kidmike41 = Splinter (the measured sensei)
Splinter calmly asks practical questions: “How do you propose the government go about removing illegal immigrants?” and discusses E-Verify implementation.
Psychological breakdown: Conscientious, rule-oriented, and implementation-focused. Less emotionally reactive, more interested in workable procedures and state-level realities. Provides grounding but often gets lost amid louder voices.
on3.com
Wobmam Rulez! / THE_DEVIL = Casey Jones (the vigilante hothead ally)
Casey rants about “his own army” of agents that taxpayers fund, invoking revolutionary spirit against tyranny.
Psychological breakdown: Anti-authoritarian with romantic revolutionary framing. Hyper-vigilant to concentrated power; channels legitimate oversight concerns but can tilt toward conspiratorial interpretations under emotional stress.
on3.com
TarponSpringsNole = Shredder (the chaotic provocateur)
Shredder drops bombs like “Naturalize them. They’re waaaay better citizens than mediocre, racist white dudes.”
Psychological breakdown: High disagreeableness used for provocation and status-signaling. Maximalist trolling triggers opponents effectively for engagement but destroys constructive dialogue. Pure edgelord energy.
on3.com
jimneffer / Rifler = Foot Clan analysts (cynical institutional observers)
They note that politicians on both sides benefit from keeping immigration broken as a perpetual campaign issue—GOP shifts from reform bills to executive action depending on who holds power.
Psychological breakdown: Public choice realism and institutional cynicism. Accurately diagnoses incentive problems but can foster resignation rather than solutions. Clear-eyed but low on optimism.
on3.com
Episode Arc: April’s initial reports get complicated by counter-facts mid-fight. Raph scores “I told you so” points. Leo pushes for consistent enforcement + legislative fixes. Mikey has an emotional moment. Donnie cracks jokes. They battle Foot Soldiers (bad-faith posts) and ultimately agree the sewer of online discourse needs better context, less outrage farming, and actual policy trade-offs. Pizza heals all.Cowabunga takeaway: Immigration enforcement involves real trade-offs between security, compassion, and incentives. Selective stories and hyperbole make for great thread drama—but cooler heads (and full facts) make better policy.
In your opinion, why doesn’t e-verify work?
In California, they have passed several laws restricting use of it. Why?
The next president needs to dismantle this rogue agency and replace it with a proper INS organization.
Start with not MURDERING non illegal immigrants, maybe?