2019 Uniforms

TrueRU

Senior
Feb 4, 2004
2,414
717
113
Are they changing at all? Personally I hated last year's. We looked too similar to Wisconsin and all the other red teams in the B1G.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 76Scarlet and Goku

ScarletDave

Heisman
Oct 7, 2010
34,595
15,348
85
Ash killed every tradition we had and the white helmets is another. At least it will be easy in the future, if there are any pictures of us in white helmets we’ll know exactly what era it was from and they can throw them out. Something so simple to please the few fans that are left and corn-for-brains is so clueless he couldn’t care less
 
Sep 27, 2006
20,274
23,340
0
Ash killed every tradition we had and the white helmets is another. At least it will be easy in the future, if there are any pictures of us in white helmets we’ll know exactly what era it was from and they can throw them out. Something so simple to please the few fans that are left and corn-for-brains is so clueless he couldn’t care less

You realize that the team, the players and not Ash picked the white helmets, right? Ash actually wanted the red helmets but the team picked white
https://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/2018/09/will_rutgers_football_wear_scarlet_helmets_again_t.html
 

koleszar

Heisman
Jan 1, 2010
37,305
58,602
113
You realize that the team, the players and not Ash picked the white helmets, right? Ash actually wanted the red helmets but the team picked white
https://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/2018/09/will_rutgers_football_wear_scarlet_helmets_again_t.html
Sometimes youth should listen to their elders. They usually know better. O and players the choice of white helmets:

 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
114,264
53,334
102
BLOCK numbers.

This “Rutgers font” we use across the board in Athletics is terrible.

White helmets should never be used at home. But I don’t mind an all white look on the road.
 

knightfan7

Heisman
Jul 30, 2003
95,409
69,228
113
Nike? Were they the ones where you couldn't read the #s?

How would the fans know who to complain about?
 

ScarletKid2008

Heisman
Sep 8, 2006
8,039
10,542
113
Look good, feel good, play good.

That’s what my little league coach always said anyways when our jerseys weren’t tucked in.
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
Nike treated RU horribly. Their offer was a joke. No RU fan should be singing the praises of Nike.

Our uniforms last year were the only thing we’ve gotten right under Ash. They are sharp. Hope we keep them.

The uniforms are nice, but, the wrong shade of red
 

RUSK97

All-American
Dec 28, 2007
10,460
6,551
0
Nike treated us horribly. But Adidas is doing the same thing.

I don’t understand why some people have fantasies about Adidas. They talked a really good game that they were assigning a team to work with us and give us preferred status. Yet, with over six months after the signing of the contract they couldn’t get us a unique uniform for the 2017 season. Then they showed us a whole lotta love for 2018...it must’ve taken an unpaid intern a whole sixteen minutes to come up with that uniform. And what’s the reason? The FBI showed us. Their management was too busy shoveling money and Pitino, ‘ville and the like to effectively stack the cards against us. How do you field a BB team that can fairly play deep into March when there is that level of cheating going on? Condoned and financially supported by Adidas (and likely Nike)? Go ahead, buy and proudly wear your three stripes, but don't think they’re doing us any favors.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
114,264
53,334
102
Our uniforms last year were the only thing we’ve gotten right under Ash. They are sharp. Hope we keep them.
A pretty good initial design IMO.

I wouldn’t change much other than:

- BLOCK numbers
- throw some black in the shoulder and leg stripes
- stripes on the helmet(s)
- black facemask
- NJ map on the front neck yoke or on the back of the helmet. Or maybe both spots.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Leonard23

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
Adidas.. talked a really good game that they were assigning a team to work with us and give us preferred status. Yet, with over six months after the signing of the contract they couldn’t get us a unique uniform for the 2017 season. Then they showed us a whole lotta love for 2018...it must’ve taken an unpaid intern a whole sixteen minutes to come up with that uniform..

Strongly agree there... the way the talk went I expected to be WOWed.. either positively or negatively.. but it was a rubber stamp uni. And for a team that has SCARLET right in the name.. why can't a uni company give us a LOUD SCARLET RED? They do it for other teams.

Marvel's Scarlet Witch

 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

80yrdPacheco

Junior
Nov 19, 2018
182
214
0
Nike treated us badly because we where a clown show leading up to negotiations. Ya’ll remember 78-0 nothing right. The better you are, the better the contracts get and Nike is a far superior brand to be associated with.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
114,264
53,334
102
The state of NJ outline helmet is a masterpiece
But only wear it once a season, night game
The NJ silhouette should be visible for every game just not where it is now.

Put it on the back of the helmet like WVU, Texas and Miami. Or on the front neck yoke. I’m fine with both for maximum exposure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigRnj

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,709
19,818
0
Would love to think we were doing,wearing something special for year 150.
I'm sure we'll miss that opportunity too.
 
Last edited:

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,403
148,452
113
Nike treated us horribly. But Adidas is doing the same thing.

I don’t understand why some people have fantasies about Adidas. They talked a really good game that they were assigning a team to work with us and give us preferred status. Yet, with over six months after the signing of the contract they couldn’t get us a unique uniform for the 2017 season. Then they showed us a whole lotta love for 2018...it must’ve taken an unpaid intern a whole sixteen minutes to come up with that uniform. And what’s the reason? The FBI showed us. Their management was too busy shoveling money and Pitino, ‘ville and the like to effectively stack the cards against us. How do you field a BB team that can fairly play deep into March when there is that level of cheating going on? Condoned and financially supported by Adidas (and likely Nike)? Go ahead, buy and proudly wear your three stripes, but don't think they’re doing us any favors.

That’s not true. And Adidas offered us way more than Nike. So they are showing a lot more love for that reason alone.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
114,264
53,334
102
The shoulder stripes suck. We look like Wisconsin and Nebraska now.
The ones on the practice jerseys do that.

The ones on the game day uniforms do not. Some black should be added to differentiate them even more.
 

RU19931

All-Conference
May 3, 2004
2,887
2,679
0
Ash killed every tradition we had and the white helmets is another. At least it will be easy in the future, if there are any pictures of us in white helmets we’ll know exactly what era it was from and they can throw them out. Something so simple to please the few fans that are left and corn-for-brains is so clueless he couldn’t care less


So Ash killed uniforms, lets also blame him for the bad food in the stadium, long bathroom lines, and people who can't make change at the concession stands.
 

AreYouNUTS

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
123,214
57,179
113
Ash killed every tradition we had and the white helmets is another. At least it will be easy in the future, if there are any pictures of us in white helmets we’ll know exactly what era it was from and they can throw them out. Something so simple to please the few fans that are left and corn-for-brains is so clueless he couldn’t care less

This isn’t the first coach/era to wear white helmets at Rutgers.
 

DJ Spanky

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
48,149
59,042
113
We need BATTLE SCARS!!!



So Ash killed uniforms, lets also blame him for the bad food in the stadium, long bathroom lines, and people who can't make change at the concession stands.
Okay, sounds good to me!
 

RUSK97

All-American
Dec 28, 2007
10,460
6,551
0
That’s not true. And Adidas offered us way more than Nike. So they are showing a lot more love for that reason alone.
I suppose it's how you look at it. This is where you get to manipulate stats. The current deal is worth between 1.7 and 1.8MM vs Nike's 1.1MM. Adidas is paying us ~60% more over Nike per annum. And we can say ooooo and ahhhhhh. If you're saying Adidas is giving us a lot more, well...60% is quite a bump.

But clearly the apparel-makers have been in bidding wars and ramping up who they want in their stable. And I've not found more than one P5 that makes less on their apparel contract (Iowa State which is banking just over 1.5MM a year).

OK, so yes, Hobbs was forced to negotiate from a position of weakness. Though you could say under his guidance, the unmarketable product has only become more unmarketable. Forget the P5 and their sky-high contracts. We're just wannabe pretenders. So what're some of the G5 programs making? Temple has a deal with UA worth roughly 3MM a year. USF has a deal with UA worth 2.8MM. University of Memphis? Went with Nike at 2.25MM. East Carolina also with Nike for 1.6MM per year. You like stripes? Tulsa inked a deal with Adidas worth 1.6MM.

As for what I said about Louisville? Adidas pays them over 16MM a year. But that wasn't enough, so they paid Pitino another 1MM a year under the table. And hundreds of thousands to steer players to the 'ville. For years. And yes, all of that while we were playing them, so Adidas stacked the Cards (pun intended) against us.
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
196,403
148,452
113
I suppose it's how you look at it. This is where you get to manipulate stats. The current deal is worth between 1.7 and 1.8MM vs Nike's 1.1MM. Adidas is paying us ~60% more over Nike per annum. And we can say ooooo and ahhhhhh. If you're saying Adidas is giving us a lot more, well...60% is quite a bump.

But clearly the apparel-makers have been in bidding wars and ramping up who they want in their stable. And I've not found more than one P5 that makes less on their apparel contract (Iowa State which is banking just over 1.5MM a year).

OK, so yes, Hobbs was forced to negotiate from a position of weakness. Though you could say under his guidance, the unmarketable product has only become more unmarketable. Forget the P5 and their sky-high contracts. We're just wannabe pretenders. So what're some of the G5 programs making? Temple has a deal with UA worth roughly 3MM a year. USF has a deal with UA worth 2.8MM. University of Memphis? Went with Nike at 2.25MM. East Carolina also with Nike for 1.6MM per year. You like stripes? Tulsa inked a deal with Adidas worth 1.6MM.

As for what I said about Louisville? Adidas pays them over 16MM a year. But that wasn't enough, so they paid Pitino another 1MM a year under the table. And hundreds of thousands to steer players to the 'ville. For years. And yes, all of that while we were playing them, so Adidas stacked the Cards (pun intended) against us.
Your first bit said it all. Nike’s offer was to keep the deal the exact same. We also got far less product and attention.

I see it with the lacrosse team. They are far more outfitted then they were under Nike. They also are being asked to beta new products. We were never that to Nike.

Don’t be surprised if our deal with Adidas is renegotiated and signed longer term. Though their current situation may have derailed that, I don’t know.