Dazzling, exciting - clearly has talent and a strong amount of innate showmanship.
Yes there is a fair amount of 'eye candy' there to be enjoyed - some of which needs to be set aside in an evaluation
Key is - where is the kid's heart? How does he really, really want to spend his college career? - does he have a burning vision of being a key outstanding part of a synchronized defensive and offensive cohesive basketball game winning 5-guys-on-the-court machine? ... or is he going to be drawn toward a place where he senses that he will regularly be able to put the razzle-dazzle / spectacular highlight reel stuff on display.
Imagine that Pikiell is selling strongly - but not sugarcoating - impression is that Pikiell makes it very clear that the is focus is on building the program - and committed to elevating it to the point where eventually basketball analysts say - - "Rutgers .. they always play really good team basketball - they will out-hustle & out-smart & exploit the weaknesses of every team they face ... if you snooze on Rutgers even a little bit - they will make you pay dearly .... and if you manage to get a win against them - you will have had to play your very best game - and you will have been in a battle."
Ultimately, with the volume of key players that Pikiell & co. are engaging in discussions, they are going to connect with some of the right matches that buy in to the concepts & commit. There are plenty of "possibilities" - but the right ones will be the ones that are willing to completely buy -in.