-19 Michigan Point Spread

Knight177lb

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2014
1,329
1,275
113
I think we cover but I don't see much reason for respect, yet.

I get your point. We haven't beaten a ranked team yet, but still, we've covered three games in a row. I would think the bookies would pay more attention. They think Ash is still the coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FRA10Thunderbolt

read option

All-Conference
Nov 12, 2013
2,835
3,236
0
I think if our D can keep them under 30 we have a chance. And if we keep them under 30, +19 is a gift.
 

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,520
21,922
113
I get your point. We haven't beaten a ranked team yet, but still, we've covered three games in a row. I would think the bookies would pay more attention. They think Ash is still the coach.
Stop. The bookies are smarter then all of us. They don't predict wins and loses they predict a line where people will bet to make them money. There is zero disrespect at all.
 

YoucancallmeRay

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2015
1,790
1,905
113
Seems more than fair to me. We're on the road and haven't done that well against the run. Their QB is good, as is their run game. We'll need some turnovers to make it close.
 

asgot

All-Conference
Aug 8, 2017
2,130
2,361
0
Gotta take Michigan. They are playing well and we are playing ok. This is not the game we thought it was going to be in the summer
 

Scarlet Jerry

All-Conference
Jul 30, 2001
4,208
2,457
0
This Michigan team is legit, and this is the year I think that they finally beat Ohio State. We may have had a chance if this was a home game. I hope that we can keep it close for at least a half.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Visengoth

mildone_rivals

Heisman
Dec 19, 2011
55,607
51,272
0
Three and outs on offense will wear out and kill your defense.
Like wise, your defense not able to get off the field kill you also.
We have to have both sides of the ball play a great game
 

Letitrip

All-Conference
Sep 4, 2007
2,389
4,226
66
Gotta take Michigan. They are playing well and we are playing ok. This is not the game we thought it was going to be in the summer
Yea - you are right:

Wins against 1) Western Michigan 2) Northern Illinois and a bad 3) Washington Team By a combined score of 141 - 34 is so much more impressive than the RU schedule with a combined score of 134 - 34.

I am betting you have not watched a single Michigan game all year - B1G network has certainly impacted you.

Go RU -
 
Last edited:

knightfan7

Heisman
Jul 30, 2003
95,712
69,573
113
Michigan is controling games and scoring points running the ball 75% of the time. No one has come close to slowing them down, averaging 350ypg on the ground. RU didn't do a great job against the run vs Delaware.

19 makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ivan brunetti

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,391
18,837
113
I think there will be RU money early in the week and then the line will go down to maybe 17- 17 1/2 by kickoff.
Michigan is good. They're markedly better then we are. But as I posted in another thread who did they beat this year?

Northern Illinois - lost to Wyoming. I know they beat Georgia Tech and GT played Clemson tough.
Western Michigan - Sure they beat Pitt, but is Pitt any good? They're 3-1 but their three wins were against two terrible teams (UMass, Austin Peay) and Tennessee. The UT win looks good on paper but their three wins were vs. teams that barely have a pulse (Tenn. Tech, Bowling Green, Chattanooga).
Washington - Another win that looks good on paper but their only win was against Arkansas St and they have a loss to Montana which is comparable to Delaware.

My point is that UM is good but they're not Alabama good. I think we hold our own and this will be a lot closer than many think.
 
Last edited:

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,405
4,666
66
I think 19 is a little light…can someone tell me how many we scored in our other P5 game this year ? I forget.

I think we can all agree this is a major step up in class. A very tall task.
 

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,640
6,876
113
The books are just trying to make sure even money is bet on both sides .
This. The books don't set the spread. The betting public does. It's like that big jar full of jelly beans. Ask a thousand people how many there are, they will give you a thousand different answers, but if you average them all, that result will be really close every time.
Fun fact- in 85% of the games, the spread doesn't even come into play. Either the fave covers, or the dog wins outright.
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,405
4,666
66
cz…I think I understand what you are trying to say, but if you are saying one team covers, doesn’t that mean the spread was relevant in every case ?

What you meant to say is ‘the spread is usually highly inaccurate.’
 

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,640
6,876
113
cz…I think I understand what you are trying to say, but if you are saying one team covers, doesn’t that mean the spread was relevant in every case ?

What you meant to say is ‘the spread is usually highly inaccurate.’
Oh, no, the spread is usually quite accurate. Fave is short for favorite. So 85% of the time, the favorite covers the spread or the underdog wins outright. Only 15% of the time does the favorite win but not cover the spread. I would bet that number has even dropped in the past few years with all the legal sportsbooks and betting apps opening sports betting up to a huge portion of the public that never got involved in the past.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,405
4,666
66
cz...so then what do you mean by the spread not coming into play? i dont understand your choice of words
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
This Michigan team is legit, and this is the year I think that they finally beat Ohio State. We may have had a chance if this was a home game. I hope that we can keep it close for at least a half.
I think Michigan seeing Ohio State's odd start has encouraged them with the hope they can get the monkey off their backs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FRA10Thunderbolt

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,640
6,876
113
cz...so then what do you mean by the spread not coming into play? i dont understand your choice of words
What I mean is if you are going to bet the underdog, it better be because they will win, since 85% of the time, that's the only way the bet on the dog pays. Either they win, or the favorite covers and you lose your money anyway. So a couple of the guys I knew that were big sports bettors used to do was not bother with the points when they liked an underdog and bet the money line. In this game, RU is +700 on the money line, which means if you bet $100 and we win, you win $700. But they have to win outright. So taking RU and the points will result in you winning or losing both bets in 85 out of 100 games. only 15 out of 100 times will you win with the points and lose the bet straight up. Does that make sense?
 

Eagleton95.99

All-American
Jul 25, 2001
7,559
6,482
113
Michigan is given respect like they are Alabama.
Rutgers is going to score points against them since our Oline is finally coming together.
How come no one is pointing that out?
We ran for 4.2 yards a Cary against an FCS team. An entire squad of kids that didn’t even get 2 stars. #4 was blowing up our soft OL all day. IMO if the O does OK against Michigan it will be because the coaches schemed to hide our weaknesses not because our OL stepped up. Hope I’m wrong.
 
Nov 26, 2019
2,111
6,273
0
I’ll take Mich St. again this Saturday.

As far as RU goes the team looks better every week. I have no idea how good Michigan is so I’ll pass on betting this game. 19 seems a bit high and will probably come down a point or 1.5 by game time.
Hopefully RU can get some turnovers and ST magic and beat them.
 

asgot

All-Conference
Aug 8, 2017
2,130
2,361
0
Yea - you are right:

Wins against 1) Western Michigan 2) Northern Illinois and a bad 3) Washington Team By a combined score of 141 - 34 is so much more impressive than the RU schedule with a combined score of 134 - 34.

I am betting you have not watched a single Michigan game all year - B1G network has certainly impacted you.

Go RU -
A Western Michigan team who beat Pitt, who had just beaten Tennessee on the road.
 

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,391
18,837
113
A Western Michigan team who beat Pitt, who had just beaten Tennessee on the road.

As I noted above the Tennessee win looks good on paper but UT will be lucky if they're bowl eligible. That would only be because their three wins this year are Chattanooga, Tenn. Tech and Bowling Green all of which are below Temple in Sagarin. Plus they still have South Alabama which gives them 4 wins. They would have to beat both South Carolina and Vanderbilt to be bowl eligible. As FL, GA, Ole Miss, KY and Missouri are all likely losses.
Illinois is the only B1G 10 team below Tennessee in Sagarin and Purdue is just about the same level.
Beating Tennessee this year is no big thing.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,488
12,794
78
Michigan is controling games and scoring points running the ball 75% of the time. No one has come close to slowing them down, averaging 350ypg on the ground. RU didn't do a great job against the run vs Delaware.

19 makes sense.

I don’t disagree on the first part. I think it’s a stretch to say the RU offense struggled though in any way against Delaware. Seemed to me we could move the ball at will.

the only area of concern vs. Delaware was the run defense, but on that, something tells me there was a good amount of home cooking going on in looking the other way / whistle chewing the offensive holding calls. Have to rewatch the game but I find it hard to believe we could stuff Tucker the way we did at Syracuse but couldn’t manage to contain a throw first FCS team’s run attack.
 

rufeelinit

All-Conference
May 16, 2010
12,647
4,351
0
Major step up in competition for us this weekend. That is what this line indicates. To have a shot, we need to continue the win the takeaway battle by not turning the ball over and keep the penalties to a minimum. Vedral needs to be an effective game manager and make very good decisions.

The OL at best is a work in progress, and our DL is going to need to use speed and scheme to avoid allowing the Michigan OL to get a big push and keep them off our LB's.

While I am not entirely sold on Michigan being ready to win the B-10 particularly after losing Bell, I have no issue with them being a prohibitive favorite this week.
 

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,391
18,837
113
I don’t disagree on the first part. I think it’s a stretch to say the RU offense struggled though in any way against Delaware. Seemed to me we could move the ball at will.

the only area of concern vs. Delaware was the run defense, but on that, something tells me there was a good amount of home cooking going on in looking the other way / whistle chewing the offensive holding calls. Have to rewatch the game but I find it hard to believe we could stuff Tucker the way we did at Syracuse but couldn’t manage to contain a throw first FCS team’s run attack.

Once again the perception that we were having trouble with the run vs. Delaware comes down to two plays: two plays that can't happen this week.
They had 34 carries for 159 yards. But they gained 94 of those yards on just two plays. Throw those out (I know you can't) you've got 32 carries for 65 yards, a 2.03 average, better then we did vs Syracuse (2.6) or Temple (3.1).
Of course Michigan is a whole other talent level but that's why you play the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RW90 and RUHouston