No respect from Las Vegas. -19
Bet heavy on RU.
We have covered every game easily this year.
Bet heavy on RU.
We have covered every game easily this year.
I think we cover but I don't see much reason for respect, yet.
Stop. The bookies are smarter then all of us. They don't predict wins and loses they predict a line where people will bet to make them money. There is zero disrespect at all.I get your point. We haven't beaten a ranked team yet, but still, we've covered three games in a row. I would think the bookies would pay more attention. They think Ash is still the coach.
Coming together?? We played Delaware!Michigan is given respect like they are Alabama.
Rutgers is going to score points against them since our Oline is finally coming together.
How come no one is pointing that out?
The books are just trying to make sure even money is bet on both sides .Michigan is given respect like they are Alabama.
Rutgers is going to score points against them since our Oline is finally coming together.
How come no one is pointing that out?
Three and outs on offense will wear out and kill your defense.I think if our D can keep them under 30 we have a chance. And if we keep them under 30, +19 is a gift.
Sometimes it takes a cupcake game to iron out issues with consistency and togethernessComing together?? We played Delaware!
I get your point. We haven't beaten a ranked team yet, but still, we've covered three games in a row. I would think the bookies would pay more attention. They think Ash is still the coach.
Three and outs on offense will wear out and kill your defense.
Like wise, your defense not able to get off the field kill you also.
We have to have both sides of the ball play a great game
Yea - you are right:Gotta take Michigan. They are playing well and we are playing ok. This is not the game we thought it was going to be in the summer
I am so confused - according to the consensus on this board Delaware was a classic "trap" game - now we win easily and they are a "cupcake". Please help me understand what changed???Sometimes it takes a cupcake game to iron out issues with consistency and togetherness
This. The books don't set the spread. The betting public does. It's like that big jar full of jelly beans. Ask a thousand people how many there are, they will give you a thousand different answers, but if you average them all, that result will be really close every time.The books are just trying to make sure even money is bet on both sides .
Oh, no, the spread is usually quite accurate. Fave is short for favorite. So 85% of the time, the favorite covers the spread or the underdog wins outright. Only 15% of the time does the favorite win but not cover the spread. I would bet that number has even dropped in the past few years with all the legal sportsbooks and betting apps opening sports betting up to a huge portion of the public that never got involved in the past.cz…I think I understand what you are trying to say, but if you are saying one team covers, doesn’t that mean the spread was relevant in every case ?
What you meant to say is ‘the spread is usually highly inaccurate.’
I think Michigan seeing Ohio State's odd start has encouraged them with the hope they can get the monkey off their backs.This Michigan team is legit, and this is the year I think that they finally beat Ohio State. We may have had a chance if this was a home game. I hope that we can keep it close for at least a half.
What I mean is if you are going to bet the underdog, it better be because they will win, since 85% of the time, that's the only way the bet on the dog pays. Either they win, or the favorite covers and you lose your money anyway. So a couple of the guys I knew that were big sports bettors used to do was not bother with the points when they liked an underdog and bet the money line. In this game, RU is +700 on the money line, which means if you bet $100 and we win, you win $700. But they have to win outright. So taking RU and the points will result in you winning or losing both bets in 85 out of 100 games. only 15 out of 100 times will you win with the points and lose the bet straight up. Does that make sense?cz...so then what do you mean by the spread not coming into play? i dont understand your choice of words
We ran for 4.2 yards a Cary against an FCS team. An entire squad of kids that didn’t even get 2 stars. #4 was blowing up our soft OL all day. IMO if the O does OK against Michigan it will be because the coaches schemed to hide our weaknesses not because our OL stepped up. Hope I’m wrong.Michigan is given respect like they are Alabama.
Rutgers is going to score points against them since our Oline is finally coming together.
How come no one is pointing that out?
A Western Michigan team who beat Pitt, who had just beaten Tennessee on the road.Yea - you are right:
Wins against 1) Western Michigan 2) Northern Illinois and a bad 3) Washington Team By a combined score of 141 - 34 is so much more impressive than the RU schedule with a combined score of 134 - 34.
I am betting you have not watched a single Michigan game all year - B1G network has certainly impacted you.
Go RU -
A Western Michigan team who beat Pitt, who had just beaten Tennessee on the road.
Michigan is controling games and scoring points running the ball 75% of the time. No one has come close to slowing them down, averaging 350ypg on the ground. RU didn't do a great job against the run vs Delaware.
19 makes sense.
Good. I want them thinking about Ohio State.I think Michigan seeing Ohio State's odd start has encouraged them with the hope they can get the monkey off their backs.
Every game is winnable! Jeez, should we just forfeit the next two weeks to save ourselves???Need to get thru the next two games healthy because the next 5 out 7 are very winnable.
I don’t disagree on the first part. I think it’s a stretch to say the RU offense struggled though in any way against Delaware. Seemed to me we could move the ball at will.
the only area of concern vs. Delaware was the run defense, but on that, something tells me there was a good amount of home cooking going on in looking the other way / whistle chewing the offensive holding calls. Have to rewatch the game but I find it hard to believe we could stuff Tucker the way we did at Syracuse but couldn’t manage to contain a throw first FCS team’s run attack.