10 second call?
- Thread starter mdlUK.1
- Start date
Because the officials are idiots and lazy. They just looked at the shot clock instead of actually counting. They failed to realize that UF knocked the ball out of bounds and we inbounded with 28 seconds on the shot clock. If they wanted to use the shot clock instead of counting they should have been looking for 18 on the clock. But hey, math is hard.....
Just another example of home cooking at Rupp Arena. I don't see many calls like this against other Blue bloods?
Refresh my memory on exactly what happened. Did UK get the rebound and Florida knock the ball out? If that's the case, then the count does not reset. That is a recent change.
http://www.referee.com/basketball-2015-16-mens-basketball-rules-changes/
The 10-second backcourt count resets except when:
The 10-second backcourt count resets except when:
- Defender causes the ball to go out of bounds;
- Offense retains possession on a held ball; or
- A technical foul is called on the offensive team.
UK had 27 FT attempts, Florida had 6; 22 fouls for UF, 13 for UK....tell me more about how the refs weren't fair to UK.
That may be it. I know Gabriel got a rebound. Don't remember if he was fouled or it was just knocked oob. Replay is on SEC channel now. I'll check.
I thought out of bounds and timing issues were reviewable in the last 2 min? Not sure how a team challenges that though .
The ball crossed the line on a pass with 21 seconds on the shot clock but we had gotten a little complacent
It is just an example of head scratching calls we seem to get at home. They shot 30+ three pointers. UK was driving.....did you watch the game?
Ridiculous to only cite the foul disparity to judge the officials. Style of play often times determines how many fouls each team gets.
There were lots of bad calls against UK and anyone who watched the game would agree.
There were lots of bad calls against UK and anyone who watched the game would agree.
Yesterday Florida played defense with its hands. Lots of fouls.
As was state to the UF homer with many digits in his name you don't get many fouls called from 30 3s and uncontested layups. Their were dozens of over the back and pushes that could have been called on the gators. Fouls are subjective calls. A 10 second call late in the game is basic counting. I don't believe there was anyone watching that game thought a 10 second would be called or should have been called. It shocked everyone.
I was talking with my brother when I was typing and he lives in Arkansas. I meant Florida.
A review would have only confirmed they got the call right.
There's a lot of ignorance of rules sitting in the stands (and on Rupp's Rafters). And sometimes it is intentional, like in this thread when the complainers ignore (root of ignorance) your correction by quoting the rule. They got the call right.
We could have called a timeout with 0:21 on the shot clock and the 10-second count would have restarted.
That was it. Gabriel got the rebound and uf knock it out. So they only had 8 seconds to get it over. Regardless, Monk shoulda seen the shot clock.
It was a bogus 10 second call. Hence, Monk and Briscoe's reaction. These guys aren't perfect, but they have played enough basketball with a 10-second rule that it's pretty easy to estimate when that time passes. They both knew right away they got shorted. Monk was even pointing at the scoreboard, asking the head ref to review it.
I would add to your post and say that people need to READ the entire thread before posting. Over the years I have seen tons of posters make themselves look stupid by posting without reading the thread.
Monk immediately told the ref to look up at the big board. They shorted the clock. It's hard to see because CBS' ****** broadcast was too busy showing a stupid replay instead of the live game, but it appeared the shot clock started at 28 or 27.
The post game interview with Gators coach said they were hanging all over UK, It was the only chance they had to stop the drive.
But the poster above got it right. Gabriel got the rebound, so the clock reset to 30. The Florida player knocked it out at 28. So we only had 8 seconds to get it over. The refs got it right. Spit spit spit.
When will some of you get it. SEC officials are just incredibly bad all around for all teams every game. I'd take my old 14th region officials over them and they were really really bad.
Did you bother to read ANY of the posts that clearly point out how the ACTUAL RULES show it was the right call?
You seem to think your opinion, the crowd's reaction, or (amazingly) the reactions of two players should count for more than the actual rules of the game?
I agree. I thought the shot clock should have reset (it did not). After watching a replay and reading the rule, the call was correct. We only had 8 seconds to get the ball across. WG used up 2 of our 10 seconds.
So free throw attempts are the sole arbiter in referee bias? I didn't think UK got shafted by the officials, there were bad calls both ways but it was one of the better called SEC games of the year IMO. FT came down to style of play. Driving gets fouls, 22 foot jump shots don't.
Which of those 21 was wrong? This was covered to death. UK pounded the ball inside and drove to the basket. UF settled for 20 foot shots. There should have been a 21 FT advantage. If UF didn't like that stop chucking 3's.
Free throw disparity if all y'all point to when we play a road game. We always talk about Kansas free throw disparities when they play at home.
Isn't there some sort of violation against a player going off for 30 points in one half?
Isn't there a new rule against that?
[smoke]
Isn't there a new rule against that?
[smoke]
there are teams that you can look at the box score and see a big FT advantage and automatically know it was bogus officiating but U.K. Isn't one of those teams due to defensive style of play
Teams that play aggressive defense and physical..... those teams should never have that huge of a FT advantage... but Cal for some stupid reason plays defense like we are afraid to foul. Even though all the evidence shows that the best defense is a dare the officials to call it defense because officials can't call them all.
That first half was in UF's favor and if you didn't notice it, then watch the game again... half of our turnovers were bad calls alone
Teams that play aggressive defense and physical..... those teams should never have that huge of a FT advantage... but Cal for some stupid reason plays defense like we are afraid to foul. Even though all the evidence shows that the best defense is a dare the officials to call it defense because officials can't call them all.
That first half was in UF's favor and if you didn't notice it, then watch the game again... half of our turnovers were bad calls alone