1-12 Lunardi Bracket

Bgognat03

Redshirt
Jan 8, 2017
47
24
0
There's literally 0% chance Duke isn't in our bracket.
We would never get lucky enough to get in Duke's bracket. I would love to be, as we are a match-up nightmare for Duke and could easily beat them worse than FSU just did. However, they will be in a bracket with Nova or Zaga as their 1 seed. They will get their annual kush ride to the final four. Although, they are so bad defensively that they still could get bounced very early.
 

kmill14

Redshirt
Jan 31, 2005
130,470
20
0
We would never get lucky enough to get in Duke's bracket. I would love to be, as we are a match-up nightmare for Duke and could easily beat them worse than FSU just did. However, they will be in a bracket with Nova or Zaga as their 1 seed. They will get their annual kush ride to the final four. Although, they are so bad defensively that they still could get bounced very early.

Nova is an easy game for Duke?
 

Dakota25

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2014
2,460
1,027
0
UK's draw will likely be:
IU 8 seed
Louisville 4 seed
Duke 2 seed
Final four UNC or UCLA
That would get a lot of ratings. The committee doesn't care about anything else and I base that on the kind of matchups they have created in the past. I fully expect a similar draw to the one I posted.
 

coolioo1

Senior
Aug 16, 2011
1,155
849
0
I just like playing teams we don't usually play regardless of how good they are. it is fun and unless it is down the road, it just isn't fair to make UK bring in hostile rivalry situations early in the bracket into the mix while other teams get to avoid them.

I want no part of WVU this year. More of a traditional Huggie team, which could be dangerous especially if they continue their great play. WVU is leading the country in winning margin
 

Bgognat03

Redshirt
Jan 8, 2017
47
24
0
Nova is an easy game for Duke?
Them or Zaga would be the easiest of the 1's or 2's for Duke, or really any team. Nova is a good team, but I have seen them in several close games this year against teams that aren't that good. They could absolutely win it all again, but I like the chances of several other teams better. KU, UCLA, UK, Oregon, Baylor, WVU, UL, UNC, UVA, FSU would all me much harder than either Nova or Zaga in my opinion.
 
Jan 9, 2007
15,353
13,412
0
Anyone who doesn't think our bracket is going to be a bunch of really good teams who are under seeded so they can all be stuffed into a super region of death hasn't paid attention the last 7 years
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,715
71,152
113
I guess playing in the SEC hurts us even more than we realize. I've been thinking about this a lot lately.
If we played in the ACC we wouldn't see other top ACC teams in our bracket until the E8 (there are going to be 10 ACC teams in, so each region is going to be stacked with them), but since we play in such a weak league, the committee will have no problem putting us with the strongest 2, 3 and 4 seeds.
So we probably will see Baylor as our 2 and FSU as our 3, probably Oregon as our 4.
Thanks SEC.
 
Jan 3, 2003
145,534
15,709
0
I think there is very little difference in the top 8-10 teams. And so 1 seed (& 2 seed) projections will be changing almost weekly.
 

Ugoff

Heisman
May 7, 2009
16,403
21,489
0
Duke isn't getting to the final four. They're going to pull another Lehigh.
 

hotelblue

Heisman
Jul 6, 2006
41,683
13,121
0
an almost moral institution then
the clappettes then
the whores then
the cheaters then
the trippers then
the clippers