I was thinking the same.not sure how they can even come up with this with all the roster turnover
85th, ahead of only Penn State who were 95th.Where were we at the start of last year on this?
Watching Gurdak yesterday, I have to say that simply replacing Ogbole with Gurdak and keeping the six players we kept makes this team markedly better. Adding Smith, Jones, Sydnor and the rest of the players Rutgers added provides a lot of hope that Rutgers will win more than a couple of games more than the 14 games Rutgers won last season.We finished last year at 125, so KenPom has us 43 spots higher.
I believe the preseason rankings are based on previous production of the PLAYERS on the roster somehow extrapolated to team adjusted offensive and adjusted defensive efficiencies, so I’m taking this as a huge positive that KenPom is viewing our roster to be markedly better.
Obviously, a preseason ranking is going to be sketchy until games are played, so we have to take it all with a huge grain of salt. But the efficiency rating has to give us some minor measure of hope about a better roster.
With the current state of the football program, RU Hoops has a great opportunity to bring the RAC back to that level, which no doubt could be responsible for an extra win or 3Also, if they're as improved as they appear, the RAC should return to being the Trapezoid of Terror again. Lost way too many home games last year,.
The Knight Report
Rutgers vs. Maryland Preview: Early Thoughts on the Terps - TKR Pod
The Knight Report
Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
On3 Football
Report: NIL payments put future of EA Sports College Football in jeopardy
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football HC Greg Schiano talks Maryland game week
The Knight Report Football
ESPN FPI projects Rutgers Football's 2026 schedule - Week Seven