What changed for the iowa run game against Washington?

r_desihawk

All-Conference
Jul 3, 2025
3,293
4,746
112
Washington’s defense is ranked a respectable #50ish but we ran on them like they were uni type. Unexpected to say the least after repeated horrible performances. Did we change anything (such as blocking scheme) or wa did screwup schematically?

one thing i noticed was that moulton ran a bit differently frequently attacking holes emerging laterally instead of north south before turning upfield…i’m no expert but it looked unusual to me
 

eyesofhawk

All-Conference
Apr 17, 2011
3,617
3,453
113
Washington’s defense is ranked a respectable #50ish but we ran on them like they were uni type. Unexpected to say the least after repeated horrible performances. Did we change anything (such as blocking scheme) or wa did screwup schematically?

one thing i noticed was that moulton ran a bit differently frequently attacking holes emerging laterally instead of north south before turning upfield…i’m no expert but it looked unusual to me
What have I been saying the problem was?

That would still be the answer, as to what got fixed
 

HawkAlum2002

All-Conference
Oct 18, 2017
509
1,144
93
We weren't playing Michigan and Ohio State, and Washington was awful at tackling. We could've ran for 400 yards if we didn't need to pass some just for practice. Pleasantly surprised as I thought it'd be more like a 23-20 game one way or the other. Took care of that in the first half.
 

theiacowtipper

All-Conference
Feb 17, 2004
936
2,100
93
Just one game for my perspective against Washington but they looked like the worst coached defense I have ever seen. They lacked any kind of physicality. They were charmin soft. They looked like they had no clue where they were supposed to be.

I’ve watched big ten football for a long time. First Penn State. The Nebraska. Then Maryland and Rutgers. Then the west coast teams. all of them struggled because they could not adjust to the physicality of big ten football.
 

uihawk82

All-Conference
Nov 17, 2021
3,080
4,569
113
Washington’s defense is ranked a respectable #50ish but we ran on them like they were uni type. Unexpected to say the least after repeated horrible performances. Did we change anything (such as blocking scheme) or wa did screwup schematically?

one thing i noticed was that moulton ran a bit differently frequently attacking holes emerging laterally instead of north south before turning upfield…i’m no expert but it looked unusual to me
I posted about the same question and my thought was perhaps Wash does something different in their run stop scheme that enabled our blocking patters to work or our coaches changed a bit the angles our blockers take and some slightly different scheme stuff. It was great to watch.
 

Fight4Iowa

Senior
Nov 25, 2025
353
503
93
1. Moulton ran with maximum effort
2. Ferentz tinckers with o-line early in season and has now found better, improving formula
 

Ripcord

Senior
Aug 30, 2016
407
535
63
Ineresting thoughts, all of you.

does anybody have any perspectives to offer re: Dotzler? He seems to be characterized here as the "weak link," & was just wondering if that is true, is he improving?

Something sure as Heck changed this week, and it was not entirely the QB or defense.
 

RuggieC

All-Conference
Mar 30, 2014
558
1,115
93
We seem to start slow and I think we are getting into more of a groove. I also think they could not ignore our passing game so they could not completely sell out against the run. Heck brings a bit more to the game....i know it is just one game but a nite game on the road in a tough place to play and he did not flinch. The play calling was much more diverse this game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twindman
Feb 25, 2008
32,583
31,692
113
Mostly I'd say we weren't playing against five or six future NFL players in the defensive front seven like we were against Ohio State. Our inability to run against Iowa State I attribute to growing pains and Kirk running a very vanilla blocking scheme.
Iowa State/Rogers' defensive scheme he brought over from Washington State, also had a lot to do with it.

It forces everything into a phone booth and doesn't allow well for zone/stretch plays, especially if you're unfamiliar with it (i.e. facing it for the first time in the second week of the season).

The issue was our pass game couldn't open up the run the way we wanted it to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iron Doc
Feb 25, 2008
32,583
31,692
113
Washington’s defense is ranked a respectable #50ish but we ran on them like they were uni type. Unexpected to say the least after repeated horrible performances. Did we change anything (such as blocking scheme) or wa did screwup schematically?

one thing i noticed was that moulton ran a bit differently frequently attacking holes emerging laterally instead of north south before turning upfield…i’m no expert but it looked unusual to me
Out fat linemen stopped being fat..........problem solved.
 

BigOHawk1

All-Conference
Oct 27, 2001
574
1,078
93
We seem to start slow and I think we are getting into more of a groove. I also think they could not ignore our passing game so they could not completely sell out against the run. Heck brings a bit more to the game....i know it is just one game but a nite game on the road in a tough place to play and he did not flinch. The play calling was much more diverse this game.
Oline was challenged by coaches, media and fans + no Mich or OSU lines...played angry as well...awesome to see, now a B10 west revenge tour upcoming...
 
Hawkeye Report

Latest

  1. 01 Hawkeye Report Basketball Recruiting Breaking down the impact of Iowa WBB landing Khalia Hartwell
  2. 02 Hawkeye Report Basketball VIDEO: Iowa Men's Basketball Practice
  3. 03 Hawkeye Report Basketball Iowa men's basketball media day news and notes
  4. 04 Hawkeye Report Basketball Ben McCollum speaks at Iowa men's basketball media day
  5. 05 Hawkeye Report Olympics Nevada native Larramendy among Hawkeye quartet at U23 Worlds