Millbrook D is tough! Week 1 predictions are a slog because of roster turnover so I agree with you.Those are some high scores. I am going to go out on a limb and say Garner will not score 30 points on Millbrook. I doubt they score more than 2 TD.
Some really interesting games that are on my radar:
→ Hough @ Northwestern (SC)
→ Mallard Creek @ Rolesville
→ Millbrook @ Garner
View attachment 1397536
I agreeByrnes/Indy will not be close at all. Byrnes will destroy them.
Millbrook 42Those are some high scores. I am going to go out on a limb and say Garner will not score 30 points on Millbrook. I doubt they score more than 2 TD.
That's a 39 point gap on his prediction.Millbrook 42
Garner 0
Right, thats a given. But, getting a very low percentage of your picks right, something is off.It is a lot of fun to look at predictions and spreads but early in the season it is usually a crap shoot. I will say that Millbrook and Hoggard had great defenses last year and both teams brought back a lot plus Millbrook got a lot of transfers. Predicting that those 2 defenses would give up over 30 points each was a head scratcher to me.
Projected scores, money lines, and O/U totals are not 'pick-em predictions'- I could've made this more clear in the original post. If you see in the far right of my graphic you'll see that "My rank disagrees" with the computer projections meaning I have the opposing team ranked as better than the computer's projected winner.picked Richmond 32-31, Hoggard won 27-13
picked Leesville Rd 31-28, Jordan won 38-37 (will give you props on this one)
picked Rolesville 33-31, Mallard Creek won 45-25
said Garner would score 30 on Millbrook, score was 42-0
picked N Nash 30-29, Rose won 20-11
picked Hickory 31-29, South Point won 34-28.
1-5 so far, and the one that was picked right, was way off.
Maybe try:Projected scores, money lines, and O/U totals are not 'pick-em predictions'- I could've made this more clear in the original post. If you see in the far right of my graphic you'll see that "My rank disagrees" with the computer projections meaning I have the opposing team ranked as better than the computer's projected winner.
Regardless, I am a staunch believer that computer projections do NOT tell the full story of high school football and CAN be trusted more in non-coin flip games- my graphic's intent was to list games to watch, not make predictions.
Understood. It makes more sense when you phrase it that way. But either way, Byrnes/Indy was never a game of the week contender. It was always going to be a very one sided game sans lightning.Projected scores, money lines, and O/U totals are not 'pick-em predictions'- I could've made this more clear in the original post. If you see in the far right of my graphic you'll see that "My rank disagrees" with the computer projections meaning I have the opposing team ranked as better than the computer's projected winner.
Regardless, I am a staunch believer that computer projections do NOT tell the full story of high school football and CAN be trusted more in non-coin flip games- my graphic's intent was to list games to watch, not make predictions.