This might portend the end of my following college football...

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,389
2,965
113
Technically yes, but just a preseason game (and not a whole one at that) , and had only signed a preseason contract.
I believe this ruling currently applies to 16 players.

They still played professional football and were paid to do it. I can sort of see the truly undrafted players who never played a down of any kind for an NFL team having another year of eligibility. Guys that get paid to play NFL football should not be allowed to return to college football.

I wonder how the "academics" are going to work? Can they reenroll at a school as a freshman? What will the acceptance requirements be?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rob Hawk

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
19,901
16,833
113
They still played professional football and were paid to do it. I can sort of see the truly undrafted players who never played a down of any kind for an NFL team having another year of eligibility. Guys that get paid to play NFL football should not be allowed to return to college football.

I wonder how the "academics" are going to work? Can they reenroll at a school as a freshman? What will the acceptance requirements be?

This is what many of us on here (maybe you as well) have predicted for a while now: that players who were drafted (or undrafted) but only ever made the practice squad or similar would get to return to college ball.

Yes, this player only played in a preseason game, and briefly at that, but he played in an NFL game.

This simply cracks the door for the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forkcock

Harvard Gamecock

All-Conference
May 5, 2014
3,162
2,903
113
They still played professional football and were paid to do it. I can sort of see the truly undrafted players who never played a down of any kind for an NFL team having another year of eligibility. Guys that get paid to play NFL football should not be allowed to return to college football.

I wonder how the "academics" are going to work? Can they reenroll at a school as a freshman? What will the acceptance requirements be?
I don't know about Freshman, maybe they can give them an internship at a driving range.
 

gamecock stock

All-Conference
Jan 21, 2022
3,660
3,293
113


They are no longer even pretending college football is an amateur sport.

I can't say that I have or will stop following college football. But, I'm clearly past the point of caring how things flow. To me, that's sad. I post on this site because I genuinely like everyone on this site and consider people here as "friends", if that's possible "on-line". I don't agree with everyone here on everything sports-wise, Gamecock-wise, political-wise, etc. But so what? I don't agree with family members on everything. As Spurrier would say, "It is what it is".
 

atl-cock

All-Conference
Jan 18, 2022
3,551
1,797
113
They still played professional football and were paid to do it. I can sort of see the truly undrafted players who never played a down of any kind for an NFL team having another year of eligibility. Guys that get paid to play NFL football should not be allowed to return to college football.

I wonder how the "academics" are going to work? Can they reenroll at a school as a freshman? What will the acceptance requirements be?
Consistency is important across all sports.
 
Last edited:

Harvard Gamecock

All-Conference
May 5, 2014
3,162
2,903
113
If we can sign professional players from European leagues to play for the Gamecocks in basketball, I really don't see how you can exclude NFL players. It's all crazy, I know, but what's the difference?
 

LazyIslander

Joined Aug 2, 2015
Aug 2, 2015
73
63
18
I think these players are in a unique position. At the time of them entering the NFL, they did not have any college eligibility left. But due to policy changes since then, they now have an additional year.
This shouldn’t be an ongoing issue after this season.
 

Lurker123

All-American
May 4, 2020
6,474
5,409
113
I think these players are in a unique position. At the time of them entering the NFL, they did not have any college eligibility left. But due to policy changes since then, they now have an additional year.
This shouldn’t be an ongoing issue after this season.

I would normally agree. I see that happening here. What concerns me is that we never take a step, then return to normal. We seem to take that step, think this it, then take another step towards lunacy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Piscis

Forkcock

All-Conference
Feb 11, 2006
1,711
1,814
113
I can't say that I have or will stop following college football. But, I'm clearly past the point of caring how things flow. To me, that's sad. I post on this site because I genuinely like everyone on this site and consider people here as "friends", if that's possible "on-line". I don't agree with everyone here on everything sports-wise, Gamecock-wise, political-wise, etc. But so what? I don't agree with family members on everything. As Spurrier would say, "It is what it is".

You forgot the tooth suck.
 

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
19,901
16,833
113
I think these players are in a unique position. At the time of them entering the NFL, they did not have any college eligibility left. But due to policy changes since then, they now have an additional year.
This shouldn’t be an ongoing issue after this season.

I would normally agree. I see that happening here. What concerns me is that we never take a step, then return to normal. We seem to take that step, think this it, then take another step towards lunacy.

Yes, the problem is that it never stops. Some player/players will use this ruling for their own lawsuit to come back to college. It creates a crack.
 

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,389
2,965
113
I think these players are in a unique position. At the time of them entering the NFL, they did not have any college eligibility left. But due to policy changes since then, they now have an additional year.
This shouldn’t be an ongoing issue after this season.
I see it as an ongoing issue. Players will leave early for the NFL, after using 3 years of eligibility. Some of those players will not pan out in the NFL after a few seasons. Those players will want to go back to college and get NIL money, so they will claim their 2 remaining years of eligibility. Colleges will become short term landing spots for players who were good enough to be drafted but not good enough to make it in the NFL.
 

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
19,901
16,833
113
I see it as an ongoing issue. Players will leave early for the NFL, after using 3 years of eligibility. Some of those players will not pan out in the NFL after a few seasons. Those players will want to go back to college and get NIL money, so they will claim their 2 remaining years of eligibility. Colleges will become short term landing spots for players who were good enough to be drafted but not good enough to make it in the NFL.
Sadly, many coaches would go along with it, if it meant winning. There's always a Lane Kiffin type out there.
 

Piscis

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2001
25,389
2,965
113
Sadly, many coaches would go along with it, if it meant winning. There's always a Lane Kiffin type out there.

It isn't only Lane and his type. I guarantee you Beamer would snatch up an NFL player if he wanted to come to Carolina. The service academies are probably the only programs that wouldn't take them.

The pressure on coaches to win is incredible, and it should be. They will do whatever they think they need to to win.
 

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
19,901
16,833
113
It isn't only Lane and his type. I guarantee you Beamer would snatch up an NFL player if he wanted to come to Carolina. The service academies are probably the only programs that wouldn't take them.

The pressure on coaches to win is incredible, and it should be. They will do whatever they think they need to to win.

Oh, yeah, they would all do it b/c they know someone else will if they won't. But I believe it's driven by the Kiffin types. I think they are coaches who would PREFER to not have to do it.
 

Gr8spur

Joined Sep 16, 2003
Sep 16, 2003
541
1,208
93
Most will do just about anything for money. Remember, "the LOVE of money is the root of all evil." The world proves this true every single day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18IsTheMan

Harvard Gamecock

All-Conference
May 5, 2014
3,162
2,903
113
It isn't only Lane and his type. I guarantee you Beamer would snatch up an NFL player if he wanted to come to Carolina. The service academies are probably the only programs that wouldn't take them.

The pressure on coaches to win is incredible, and it should be. They will do whatever they think they need to to win.
I would go so far as to say to say this. If one of the players who was recently ruled eligible, and he expressed a desire to come here, and Beamer declined the fan base would not be happy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lurker123

atl-cock

All-Conference
Jan 18, 2022
3,551
1,797
113
Yes, the problem is that it never stops. Some player/players will use this ruling for their own lawsuit to come back to college. It creates a crack.
Coming back to college to finish one's degree or pursue another is a good thing. Coming back to school to play varsity sports is something else,
 

atl-cock

All-Conference
Jan 18, 2022
3,551
1,797
113
It isn't only Lane and his type. I guarantee you Beamer would snatch up an NFL player if he wanted to come to Carolina. The service academies are probably the only programs that wouldn't take them.

The pressure on coaches to win is incredible, and it should be. They will do whatever they think they need to to win.
The Ivies in addition to the service academies.
 
GamecockCentral

Latest

  1. 01 GamecockCentral Buy or Sell: South Carolina football hot takes entering 2026 season
  2. 02 TheBigSpur South Carolina Wide Receivers Ranked
  3. 03 TheBigSpur Shane Beamer Era Openers | Carolina Countdown No. 15
  4. 04 GamecockCentral 🚨 Get South Carolina camp intel with 75% off GamecockCentral!!
  5. 05 GamecockCentral 10 players to keep an eye on in South Carolina's final scrimmage of preseason camp