And there are options. Reflectivity is your friend if you so choose.He can’t because we have no options.
And there are options. Reflectivity is your friend if you so choose.He can’t because we have no options.
I mean, I believe Nebraska is screwed, if only because of our incredibly conservative state. But states with a more neutral court system and supreme court could definitely challenge the legality and infringement of our basic rights.
He can’t because we have no options.
Big problem in Palm Beach County.. vandals are cutting down the poles with electric angle grinders thankfully....nobody likes it. Tell us what our options are.
There is no expectation of privacy in the public. You are being watched, recorded, and tracked everywhere you go.I did not post from a phone - never assume anything. And second, I have personally agreed to this arrangement with my phone company. I understand what it comes with when I sign up with the phone company.
I don't remember agreeing as a society, state or city to allowing Government to track every vehicle multiple times. Does that mean we must agree to it? Not sure - but it should be put in front of the public, not just assumed to be okay.
The thing is, I'm torn on the issue. I see the upside benefit, helps with crime, etc. But it's a slippery slope and those slopes often lead to government corruption and overstepping (which we are already seeing with Flock). It needs to be voted on and with parameters.
There is no expectation of privacy in the public.
Yes, abuse will always happen. There are some guardrails already in place, and we know that because abusers have been punished (officers fired, etc.). I am for expanding that punishment to be both civil and criminal if it isn't already...I honesetly don't know. Transparancy is key. For example, I would be interested in a system similar to unclaimed property in which you can query your name and information to see all executed searches about you or your property. Or the inverse, in which the entity that executed the search is required to notify you (of course, after any investigation is over, etc.).Missing the point. I don't expect my license plate to be private or what shirt I'm wearing in public. The issue is not about being watched in public - the issue is what they do with the information they are gathering. This is the slippery slope problem. People shrug and say the cameras are fine. Then ONE guy in the city mandates they buy the cameras. They are installed without restrictions, laws or ordinances and the abuse flows. This is a major flaw and problem with these cameras just getting put on a pole and telling the public to deal with it..
The abuse has already been documented and is widespread. Some people throw up their hands and act like "oh well, cameras are in the public so everything is fair game" and then are surprised or care or don't pay attention when government officials and police are running queries without any cause at all. There is stalking, random searching, following people, etc, all sorts of BS going on.
I get your point but as I understand it. It’s a public space and anyone can video anyone else for anything at any time in a public space.I did not post from a phone - never assume anything. And second, I have personally agreed to this arrangement with my phone company. I understand what it comes with when I sign up with the phone company.
I don't remember agreeing as a society, state or city to allowing Government to track every vehicle multiple times. Does that mean we must agree to it? Not sure - but it should be put in front of the public, not just assumed to be okay.
The thing is, I'm torn on the issue. I see the upside benefit, helps with crime, etc. But it's a slippery slope and those slopes often lead to government corruption and overstepping (which we are already seeing with Flock). It needs to be voted on and with parameters.
They’re stealing the wire and cameras.Big problem in Palm Beach County.. vandals are cutting down the poles with electric angle grinders thankfully.
What is the abuse you keep telling us about?Missing the point. I don't expect my license plate to be private or what shirt I'm wearing in public. The issue is not about being watched in public - the issue is what they do with the information they are gathering. This is the slippery slope problem. People shrug and say the cameras are fine. Then ONE guy in the city mandates they buy the cameras. They are installed without restrictions, laws or ordinances and the abuse flows. This is a major flaw and problem with these cameras just getting put on a pole and telling the public to deal with it..
The abuse has already been documented and is widespread. Some people throw up their hands and act like "oh well, cameras are in the public so everything is fair game" and then are surprised or care or don't pay attention when government officials and police are running queries without any cause at all. There is stalking, random searching, following people, etc, all sorts of BS going on.