UK 92% UL 81% Acceptance Rate

CatManFromCa

Sophomore

Jan 8, 2026

91

153

32

• Jul 20, 2026

• #1

¯\_(ツ)_/ thought UL was the easy commuter school.

 

Attachments

• 
  IMG_1438.jpeg

  785.7 KB · Views: 9

R

robman181

All-Conference

May 1, 2004

1,101

1,556

113

• Jul 20, 2026

• #2

They have a lot less capacity.

 

BlueVelvetFog

Heisman

Apr 12, 2016

14,532

20,133

78

• Jul 20, 2026

• #3

$$$$$$$$
UK loves money, but if you don't work your butt off while there, you don't make it. Graduation rate quite lower.

 

B

Beatle Bum

Heisman

Sep 1, 2002

43,109

65,649

113

• Jul 20, 2026

• #4

robman181 said:

They have a lot less capacity.

Click to expand...

Less spots for worse students. Probably turn away a lot of kids who should never go to college.

 

Uncle B.S.

Junior

Apr 10, 2017

140

348

63

• Jul 20, 2026

• #5

UK is a marginally better school but neither one is great shakes. Historically the people that run the state have never been particularly interested in an educated population. If everybody got too smart, who was going to work in a coal mine or on a tobacco or horse farm.

 

• 

Reactions: Pygmy Sasquatch, Hush4872, TheBlueMist and 5 others

T

TarHeelInCharlotte

Senior

Oct 23, 2025

431

568

93

• Jul 20, 2026

• #6

robman181 said:

They have a lot less capacity.

Click to expand...

This is pretty much it. UofL has like 25k students including grad students, and UK has like 38k.

UofL isn't turning away more applicants because of grades. It's because they don't have room for 38k students.

If you're an instate student, it's relatively easy to gain acceptance to both schools.

 

TheBlueMist

All-American

Feb 5, 2004

2,168

5,195

113

• Jul 22, 2026

• #7

I have degrees from both and have worked for both in different capacities. Neither are setting the educational world on fire. Both are generally average with some all-star researchers/departments getting notoriety from time to time.