WAR WITH EGYPT? Israeli Speakers Begin Eyeing ANOTHER War
The $300B is part of an MOU, so (of course) by definition it is not a contract, not binding, etc.He could try of course - although I doubt he would fight hard to give Iran money. He is more likely to just blame the Dems for the economic mess. Anyway it would get stopped by a lawsuit in a heartbeat and then much later the SC would weigh in. How they vote? Well who knows. In the meantime the 60 day agreement window would have concluded so it is kind of a moot point.
Also $300B is a LOT of money. That isn’t something you just strip out easily.
He doesn't like being reminded of the horrors the colonists performed.Exactly how are diversity, equity, and inclusion divisive? It's literally the story of this country. Additionally, the government has been for a very long time not "colorblind". What's your solution for that?
I mean, unless you're a raging racist maggot, of course.
Yes, threatening. Did Iran ever shut it down up until now? Fact is that Obama had Iran effectively boxed in with overwhelming international support. Trump tore that deal up.Iran has been threatening to close down the Straight for decades. For literally, 43 years. Just how ignorant are you libs?
You are talking about the country who was #1 in funding terrorist.....Yes, threatening. Did Iran ever shut it down up until now? Fact is that Obama had Iran effectively boxed in with overwhelming international support. Trump tore that deal up.
Your point?You are talking about the country who was #1 in funding terrorist.....
" Iran effectively boxed in with overwhelming international support."Your point?
my major complaint with trump in this Iran "excursion" was not finishing. Sun Tzu would not look happily at where we are today." Iran effectively boxed in with overwhelming international support."
You are talking about the country who was #1 in funding terrorist.....
Need me to draw a picture?
And yet there are those on the Right that believe that there is no way the monies in the MOU would ever be able to be funneled to anything but the infrastructure and rebuilding efforts they are designated for....You are talking about the country who was #1 in funding terrorist.....
Keep those wrist clean wonder woman.And yet there are those on the Right that believe that there is no way the monies in the MOU would ever be able to be funneled to anything but the infrastructure and rebuilding efforts they are designated for....
Now you worry about how they spend their money, now you don't.Keep those wrist clean wonder woman.
Here is what I know, it doesnt matter what actually happens, you are going to have something to ***** about. No matter how creative you need to get with the details.Now you worry about how they spend their money, now you don't.
And now we trust the Islamic nations that have also been accused of terrorist ties.Here is what I know, it doesnt matter what actually happens, you are going to have something to ***** about. No matter how creative you need to get with the details.
Yes, we will have better watchdogs in place as the people helping contribute are their neighbors.
I figure we can just draw straws.And now we trust the Islamic nations that have also been accused of terrorist ties.
Which nations and why trust them now?
I am not the emotional one right now.I figure we can just draw straws.
Do you live your entire life as an emotion driven ***** or just let it run rampant on a message board?
There are many countries who will be contributing and thus watching them.
Cons are in the habit of saying Iran has done this or that for 47 years. Usually they are making it up. Sometimes they get close. @Hotshoe says 43 years of threats to close the Strait.Yes, threatening. Did Iran ever shut it down up until now? Fact is that Obama had Iran effectively boxed in with overwhelming international support. Trump tore that deal up.
Only if you don't count the US. Iran might be #2.You are talking about the country who was #1 in funding terrorist.....
The crap you fall for because you so badly want to support and protect Trump.I figure we can just draw straws.
Do you live your entire life as an emotion driven ***** or just let it run rampant on a message board?
There are many countries who will be contributing and thus watching them.
I think you are mislead on who went down the "this time they will spend the money on good ****" path.The crap you fall for because you so badly want to support and protect Trump.
Gulf nations have formally denied agreeing to a proposed $300 billion reconstruction and investment fund for Iran. The fund is outlined in the U.S.-Iran memorandum of understanding, but has become a major flashpoint as regional allies reject the financial burden and U.S. officials push back on American funding.Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) ResponseTotal Ignorance of the Fund: GCC Secretary-General Jasem Al Budaiwi stated the $300 billion package was never introduced or discussed with Gulf countries.U.S. Confirmation: U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also confirmed during meetings in Bahrain that the reconstruction fund was "way down the road" and not brought up with Gulf partners.
Qatar but after the WC I worry about their back line and ability to defend the set piece.I am not the emotional one right now.
Which countries and why do you trust them so much as most Islamic countries in the area have been tied to terrorism in one fashion or another?
I am just asking a question that you can't really answer. So you deflect and call names and say I am emotional.Qatar but after the WC I worry about their back line and ability to defend the set piece.
Yeah dude, you are cool as a cucumber.
personally, I think we all could agree that this "excursion" has not gone exactly the way we might have figured after the killing of the Iranian leadership...there has been no uprising by the people to retake their government...Iran had not capitulated or surrendered unconditionally,...the strait has been a major point of economic damage for the world....and the 4-6 weeks has taken longer and issues are still not resolved...we might be closer to resolution but Iran has yet, apparently, not agreed to give up their nuclear ambitions.I think you are mislead on who went down the "this time they will spend the money on good ****" path.
Nope. I'm not the one claiming other countries will come up with the money and monitor its spending. That would be you.I think you are mislead on who went down the "this time they will spend the money on good ****" path.
Lmao. You'd vote for Mamdani over Trump. Get lost, loserwrong wrong wrong again. Cite your sources. Show me how I support a "pathetic socialist party who hates America." Show me a peer reviewed study that shows that the Democrat party is a "socialist party who hates America." Link just ONE peer reviewed study that claims this. Give me a few others peer reviewed studies about "democrats who don't want to celebrate 250." Please do it. Link them. I will read them. DO IT you bitc h.
You can't even back up your angry and emotional claims you sad old sack of sh it.
Then what was all that talk about them fundinf terrorist?Nope. I'm not the one claiming other countries will come up with the money and monitor its spending. That would be you.
You're as pathetic as your liberal cohorts. Memes. You actually believe this bullsh-t you post matters? Stop embarrassing yourself. You post like a child.
Lmao. That's all you clowns have. Meanwhile you call others Nazis. Go away you fool.You seem angry
You angry, bro?
I get it. It's tough seeing this WH flailing and trying to sell something that doesn't exist.
Trump got played by Bibi.
That's hardly open for debate.
November gonna be great.![]()
This is precisely why you liberals are pathetic scumbags. So, now America wants to kill school children. F off you loser.You haven't heard????
The US is skilled at killing school children...you know...victims that can't fight back.
Trump needs to stick with bullying places like Venezuela and Greenland.
Only a brain dead fool would post what he did. He should move to Iran and take his chances on survival.If by continting to win you mean dying, sure.
It isn't so much wants to but more so doesn't seem to care that they did.This is precisely why you liberals are pathetic scumbags. So, now America wants to kill school children. F off you loser.
Why don't you give an account then on military losses regarding Iran vs the U.S. I'll be waiting for precise details. You opened your ignorant mouth, now prove it.Just because the other side has people die, that doesn’t mean your side is winning. I know that’s the only argument you have because everything else has been a complete failure for trump. It’s extremely bad that trump has surrendered to Iran. The only people dumber than trump are you MAGAts that follow and defend everything he does.
You are talking about the country who was #1 in funding terrorist.....
Cons are in the habit of saying Iran has done this or that for 47 years. Usually they are making it up. Sometimes they get close. @Hotshoe says 43 years of threats to close the Strait.
I tried to get Gemini to pin down when Iran has explicitly threatened to close the Strait. Here's all she could come up with.
Explicit Threats (Pre-2026)
Before the current conflict, these threats were primarily used as a diplomatic and economic deterrent to counter sanctions or international military pressure.
- December 27, 2011: Iranian Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimi issued a direct and widely reported threat that Iran would cut off oil supplies through the Strait if Western economic sanctions targeting its oil exports were implemented.
- January 3, 2012: Iranian Army chief Ataollah Salehi issued a formal warning to the U.S. military regarding the presence of an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf. He explicitly stated, "Iran will not repeat its warning," and threatened to take action if the vessel returned to the Gulf.
- January 24, 2012: Following the European Union's imposition of oil sanctions, a member of the Iranian parliament, Parviz Sarvari, explicitly stated, "If any disruption happens regarding the sale of Iranian oil, the Strait... will definitely be closed."
He wants us to distrust Iran because of their terrorist ties, but doesn't think giving them hundreds of billions of dollars is not going to somehow fund terrorism.I wonder why ...hint it was something the US did in 1952 that initiated all this ****
You’re wasting your time.I am not the emotional one right now.
Which countries and why do you trust them so much as most Islamic countries in the area have been tied to terrorism in one fashion or another?
You're as pathetic as your liberal cohorts. Memes. You actually believe this bullsh-t you post matters? Stop embarrassing yourself. You post like a child.
You literally have no idea how f#cking stupid you are, do you?Why don't you give an account then on military losses regarding Iran vs the U.S. I'll be waiting for precise details. You opened your ignorant mouth, now prove it.