It has been mentioned in a couple of posts but I havent heard anything official?
The only thing I can say is that it is 100% according to this website, as of May 29.It has been mentioned in a couple of posts but I havent heard anything official?
Can't we just take it to an Iowa City judge and have him rule Banks eligible?
If you're referring to me, for the record, I don't gamble or wager on sports. I try to provide the most recent information that I can find. And, this site along with the "College sports litigation tracker" site that covers past and ongoing cases involving college athletes, are my go-to sites since I haven't seen any recent stories or info brought to light elsewhere.Man, he should have claimed to be addicted to gambling.
If you're referring to me, for the record, I don't gamble or wager on sports. I try to provide the most recent information that I can find. And, this site along with the "College sports litigation tracker" site that covers past and ongoing cases involving college athletes, are my go-to sites since I haven't seen any recent stories or info brought to light elsewhere.
no kiddingCan't we just take it to an Iowa City judge and have him rule Banks eligible?
MaybeCan't we just take it to an Iowa City judge and have him rule Banks eligible?
I definitely have thought the same. If he was a PG or SG I would feel differently but we project to already be very deep at the 3/4 positions.I’m probably in the minority but I believe Bank’s ineligibility will be net positive.
It is always tough to lose an experienced starter but IMO the opportunity to get quality minutes for the two freshman forwards is a big plus ….especially Thompson who has had a redshirt year in the system.
You didn't hear? Some around here think he was a guard. He was not a guard on offense, could guard 1-4 probably on defenseI definitely have thought the same. If he was a PG or SG I would feel differently but we project to already be very deep at the 3/4 positions.
I’m probably in the minority but I believe Bank’s ineligibility will be net positive.
It is always tough to lose an experienced starter but IMO the opportunity to get quality minutes for the two freshman forwards is a big plus ….especially Thompson who has had a redshirt year in the system.
This season is the priorityI definitely have thought the same. If he was a PG or SG I would feel differently but we project to already be very deep at the 3/4 positions.
Banks was listed as a G/F on the official Iowa site.You didn't hear? Some around here think he was a guard. He was not a guard on offense, could guard 1-4 probably on defense
Right - Thompson/ Harris is the priority this season.This season is the priority
Ben would seem to disagree, as he has left the scholly for BanksRight - Thompson/ Harris is the priority this season.
Thompson will play. This would most definitely impact Harris.Right - Thompson/ Harris is the priority this season.
It worked in Lubbock... At this point Iowa should file in US District Court of Southern Iowa. There is already Federal legal model set with the Diego Pavia ruling. Banks should be able to gain a preliminary injunction. The persuasive precedent is there!Can't we just take it to an Iowa City judge and have him rule Banks eligible?
BMC has already stated he would take Tavion back in a heartbeat. A seasoned starter vs freshmen is a no-brainerBen would seem to disagree, as he has left the scholly for Banks
Worth a shot.It worked in Lubbock... At this point Iowa should file in US District Court of Southern Iowa. There is already Federal legal model set with the Diego Pavia ruling. Banks should be able to gain a preliminary injunction. The persuasive precedent is there!
Yeah but how are we gonna win the National Championship this year?..........I’m probably in the minority but I believe Bank’s ineligibility will be net positive.
It is always tough to lose an experienced starter but IMO the opportunity to get quality minutes for the two freshman forwards is a big plus ….especially Thompson who has had a redshirt year in the system.
Of course the Nebraska troll would think it's better if we don't have Tate. At least he's consistent with his crap takes.BMC has already stated he would take Tavion back in a heartbeat. A seasoned starter vs freshmen is a no-brainer