MAGA will tell you this is your enemy

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
You cry it out. Massie lost. The people in his district decided that. I got more importantly things to be concerned about going forward that doesn't involve him.
Like I said, you should start worrying about dear leader's impeachment and conviction. There's not going to be much standing in the way.
 
Aug 30, 2025
259
269
63


What we have learned last night is that there is no place for limited government Constitutionalist libertarians/conservatives left in the GOP. I get it, we're only 2-3% of the population at this point. Democrat light has won, we have no party that represents the right anymore. Hell, never really did, they talked a good game, but never acted.

But that 2-3% is going to sting in the midterms when we don't show up to vote. The midterm landslide just got worse. Good luck keeping your guy from being impeached/convicted.

******* boomers


Shut up fhaggot. Your Iranian backed creepy candidate lost because he is a moron. He is a grifter and the people of KY had enough of him. Stop crying like a little *****.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Shut up fhaggot. Your Iranian backed creepy candidate lost because he is a moron. He is a grifter and the people of KY had enough of him. Stop crying like a little *****.
If you keep paying attention to me rather than America's Newsroom, you're going to miss what you're supposed to think today!

******* boomers
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
If you keep paying attention to me rather than America's Newsroom, you're going to miss what you're supposed to think today!

******* boomers

These young turds sound like they are a couple of your cult members eager to start a Civil War.


 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,247
3,310
113
If you keep paying attention to me rather than America's Newsroom, you're going to miss what you're supposed to think today!

******* boomers
Honestly, Massie made some votes that weren’t beneficial to the big picture objective.

There were some principled positions I agreed with him on, ie ending proxy voting. I like the line item veto approach. Breaking bills up instead of omnibus. But, when you fail, and he did fail as he was unable to garner enough pre-vote support, he needed to get inline with the party. He didn’t, he instead acted like a 4 year old. He became a problem for the broader objectives. And worse, just like MTG, the little bit of power and the hard core following went to their heads and they lost site of the bigger picture. It sucks, Massie isn’t a bad guy, and I agree with him on a lot, but he played his hand wrong and became a distraction instead of an ally. He had to go.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
Honestly, Massie made some votes that weren’t beneficial to the big picture objective.

There were some principled positions I agreed with him on, ie ending proxy voting. I like the line item veto approach. Breaking bills up instead of omnibus. But, when you fail, and he did fail as he was unable to garner enough pre-vote support, he needed to get inline with the party. He didn’t, he instead acted like a 4 year old. He became a problem for the broader objectives. And worse, just like MTG, the little bit of power and the hard core following went to their heads and they lost site of the bigger picture. It sucks, Massie isn’t a bad guy, and I agree with him on a lot, but he played his hand wrong and became a distraction instead of an ally. He had to go.

What big picture objective? Nearly everything he campaigned on has been thrown to the side.

He closed the border and in his first term put in mostly good SCOTUS. Those are his only good accomplishments. ACB is so damn questionable, that's why I say mostly good.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
These young turds sound like they are a couple of your cult members eager to start a Civil War.


Your second biggest problem is that you connect A to H when there is no BCDEFG.
 

cam_blev

Senior
Oct 7, 2005
6,467
690
113
Honestly, Massie made some votes that weren’t beneficial to the big picture objective.

There were some principled positions I agreed with him on, ie ending proxy voting. I like the line item veto approach. Breaking bills up instead of omnibus. But, when you fail, and he did fail as he was unable to garner enough pre-vote support, he needed to get inline with the party. He didn’t, he instead acted like a 4 year old. He became a problem for the broader objectives. And worse, just like MTG, the little bit of power and the hard core following went to their heads and they lost site of the bigger picture. It sucks, Massie isn’t a bad guy, and I agree with him on a lot, but he played his hand wrong and became a distraction instead of an ally. He had to go.
I have 2 questions then.
Do you think Gallrein will be more effective at getting done important things that go against the swamp?
Do you think replacing Massie with Gallrein will lead to a more effective Congress in preserving and enacting the constitution?

The original appeal of Trump was that he was antiestablishment, drain the swamp, didn't need money form billionaires because he had his own.

In the end who is in office doesn't matter only the end results and the effect they have on legislation. I expect Gallrein to be a bought and paid for establishment shill, the same as all other ineffective congressman that never present anything that rocks the boat. The Uniparty wins again the money printer stays printing and there is still a class of people that live above the law because they protect each other.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Anon1756575641

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
Your second biggest problem is that you connect A to H when there is no BCDEFG.

There is and the lines aren't even that far apart. You not wanting to accept that fact isn't my problem. Even the Democrats know it they just lie about it for there benefit.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
I have 2 questions then.
Do you think Gallrein will be more effective at getting done important things that go against the swamp?
Do you think replacing Massie with Gallrein will lead to a more effective Congress in preserving and enacting the constitution?

The original appeal of Trump was that he was antiestablishment, drain the swamp, didn't need money form billionaires because he had his own.

In the end who is in office doesn't matter only the end results and the effect they have on legislation. I expect Gallrein to be a bought and paid for establishment shill, the same as all other ineffective congressman that never present anything that rocks the boat. The Uniparty wins again the money printer stays printing and there is still a class of people that live above the law because they protect each other.

Massie accomplished nothing other than talk and vote against Trump when we needed him the most. That's why he lost. The majority of people in his district feelt the same way.

Be happy JC is probably going to lose.

 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,247
3,310
113
I have 2 questions then.
Do you think Gallrein will be more effective at getting done important things that go against the swamp?
Do you think replacing Massie with Gallrein will lead to a more effective Congress in preserving and enacting the constitution?

The original appeal of Trump was that he was antiestablishment, drain the swamp, didn't need money form billionaires because he had his own.

In the end who is in office doesn't matter only the end results and the effect they have on legislation. I expect Gallrein to be a bought and paid for establishment shill, the same as all other ineffective congressman that never present anything that rocks the boat. The Uniparty wins again the money printer stays printing and there is still a class of people that live above the law because they protect each other.
The thing you don’t get, Massie wasn’t effective and he didn’t succeed on either objective you’re talking about measuring Gallrein against. So, more effective? It would be impossible for him to be less.
 
Aug 30, 2025
259
269
63
Only people mad this morning that Massie lost are Muslims, China, Russia, liberals, goofy libertarians, and online influencer/grifters who were paid off by foreign countries to hype Massie.

It didn't work. Massie lost fair and square. Deal with it.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
Only people mad this morning that Massie lost are Muslims, China, Russia, liberals, goofy libertarians, and online influencer/grifters who were paid off by foreign countries to hype Massie.

It didn't work. Massie lost fair and square. Deal with it.

Reality back here on planet earth.

 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
MIGA LIVES ON!



That's his way of explaining to you Nazi and Islamic Socialist that you are a very small minority and that insanity will only get Democrats elected.

Ro Khanna also upset today.






He damn well knows the SDNY is investigating Epstein right now but continues to interfere with that process.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,338
59
48
That's his way of explaining to you Nazi and Islamic Socialist that you are a very small minority and that insanity will only get Democrats elected.
Hence, you'd better worry about impeachment and conviction after the midterms. What was Trump's percent of victory last time around? What percent of Constitutional conservatives exist? You Whigs are in for a helluva ride.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
Hence, you'd better worry about impeachment and conviction after the midterms. What was Trump's percent of victory last time around? What percent of Constitutional conservatives exist? You Whigs are in for a helluva ride.


He's not getting impeached. I get that's what you and Hakeem Jefferies want but it's not happening.




JUST NOW: President Trump's midterm genius strategist James Blair just CONFIRMED that the 2026 House races are close and Hakeem Jeffries Temu Obama is STUNNED "We know how to win. We've done this before!"
🔥
"We feel like we have a great opportunity to retain or EXPAND the House in some areas! We'll be playing across a wide swath of the map. Playing offense against some of their members, I don't know if they were prepared for that!" "If we listened to the conventional wisdom, Trump would not be in office!"
@JamesBlairUSA
 
Aug 30, 2025
259
269
63
Hence, you'd better worry about impeachment and conviction after the midterms. What was Trump's percent of victory last time around? What percent of Constitutional conservatives exist? You Whigs are in for a helluva ride.

It's hilarious seeing you so butthurt over a loser like Massie lmao. He grifted on you and you bought it hook, line and sinker 100%.
 

cam_blev

Senior
Oct 7, 2005
6,467
690
113
The thing you don’t get, Massie wasn’t effective and he didn’t succeed on either objective you’re talking about measuring Gallrein against. So, more effective? It would be impossible for him to be less.
But he was effective at exposing the swamp and the uniparty multiple times.

He forced the Epstein Files Transparency Act through after leadership fought it. It passed 427-1 on a recorded vote. Why fight so hard against something that popular? It led to releases that got corrupt people fired or arrested overseas.

He also forced recorded votes on the largest spending bills in our country’s history. Those bills drove massive inflation and helped create the housing crisis we’re in now, where the average first-time homebuyer is 40 years old.

That’s exactly the stuff he got ousted for, NOT because he was "ineffective". I don’t get why you think replacing the one guy who actually brings these fights forward is the answer. Instead of the ones who don’t have the balls to stand with him. Supporting someone who’ll just go along doesn’t fix anything.
 
Aug 30, 2025
259
269
63
But he was effective at exposing the swamp and the uniparty multiple times.

He forced the Epstein Files Transparency Act through after leadership fought it. It passed 427-1 on a recorded vote. Why fight so hard against something that popular? It led to releases that got corrupt people fired or arrested overseas.

He also forced recorded votes on the largest spending bills in our country’s history. Those bills drove massive inflation and helped create the housing crisis we’re in now, where the average first-time homebuyer is 40 years old.

That’s exactly the stuff he got ousted for, NOT because he was "ineffective". I don’t get why you think replacing the one guy who actually brings these fights forward is the answer. Instead of the ones who don’t have the balls to stand with him. Supporting someone who’ll just go along doesn’t fix anything.

Thank you for proving how totally ineffective Thomas Massie was for the people of Kentucky, the United States and the Republican party.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
These young turds sound like they are a couple of your cult members eager to start a Civil War.



But he was effective at exposing the swamp and the uniparty multiple times.

He forced the Epstein Files Transparency Act through after leadership fought it. It passed 427-1 on a recorded vote. Why fight so hard against something that popular? It led to releases that got corrupt people fired or arrested overseas.

He also forced recorded votes on the largest spending bills in our country’s history. Those bills drove massive inflation and helped create the housing crisis we’re in now, where the average first-time homebuyer is 40 years old.

That’s exactly the stuff he got ousted for, NOT because he was "ineffective". I don’t get why you think replacing the one guy who actually brings these fights forward is the answer. Instead of the ones who don’t have the balls to stand with him. Supporting someone who’ll just go along doesn’t fix anything.

Nobody likes Nazis. Not even other Nazis.





And they are back to let's have a Civil War.

 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
Iranian Supporting Nazis sound nervous.






JUST IN: The Iranian regime is breaking out into RECKLESS DELUSIONAL MODE, threatening to go berserk on Donald Trump if he strikes them again 47 just called Netanyahu over night
👀
JD VANCE: "We are NOT going to have a deal that allows Iran to have a nuclear weapon...WE ARE LOCKED AND LOADED."
🔥
YINGST: "A massive U.S. military buildup across the Middle East. New video shows U.S. refuelers parked at Tel Aviv...waiting in case President Trump orders new strikes against the Iranian regime." "Overnight Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps released a new threat, warning the United States and Israel against launching another bombing campaign." "The IRGC put out a statement saying if the aggression against Iran is repeated, the regional war that was promised will this time go beyond the borders of the region. And you will be dealt crushing blows in places you do not expect, and you will fall into the abyss of defeat and destruction."
@TreyYingst
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
And here comes the endless FoxNews propaganda drivel.

That about sums it up.





Turns out that Jimmy, Dave, Igor, Ryan, and an assortment of Jew hating life-losers, disgruntled libs, sexual deviants, leg-humpers, drunks and failed comedians really aren’t a great coalition for winning a conservative primary election IRL. Shocker. We didn’t ask for this ideological war, they did. And we finished it. Matter of fact, we didn’t even invite them to this party. They invited themselves. And then they **** in the punch bowl and now they’re playing dumb as to why we threw their asses out. Take your 1940s era agitprop ******** and shove it up your ***. Or go back where you came from with your “river to the sea” terrorist friends. Those radical libs will welcome you back with open arms. Agitprop is their thing. It’s their ONLY thing. Thanks. Have a great rest of your day! And a big thanks to the real conservatives who saw through this ********.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,247
3,310
113
But he was effective at exposing the swamp and the uniparty multiple times.

He forced the Epstein Files Transparency Act through after leadership fought it. It passed 427-1 on a recorded vote. Why fight so hard against something that popular? It led to releases that got corrupt people fired or arrested overseas.

He also forced recorded votes on the largest spending bills in our country’s history. Those bills drove massive inflation and helped create the housing crisis we’re in now, where the average first-time homebuyer is 40 years old.

That’s exactly the stuff he got ousted for, NOT because he was "ineffective". I don’t get why you think replacing the one guy who actually brings these fights forward is the answer. Instead of the ones who don’t have the balls to stand with him. Supporting someone who’ll just go along doesn’t fix anything.
He definitely was not effective.

I’d argue the podcast community, engagement by voters, and Dem conspiracy nuts got the Epstein thing pushed through. To credit Massie for that is hilarious.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
61,293
4,104
113
DOJ charges Iraqi militia leader with directing terror plots against Jewish institutions and threatening Trump — as a national security expert warns vetting failures and immigration fraud have left the U.S. wide open to jihad-inspired attacks from within. Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood al-Saadi, a senior member of Iran-backed Kata'ib Hizballah, orchestrated nearly 20 terrorist attacks across Europe before facing trial in New York. Heritage Foundation's Lora Ries says the case exposes a system where 'every time you offer an immigration benefit, people will flock to it and often commit fraud to obtain it.'




 

cam_blev

Senior
Oct 7, 2005
6,467
690
113
He definitely was not effective.

I’d argue the podcast community, engagement by voters, and Dem conspiracy nuts got the Epstein thing pushed through. To credit Massie for that is hilarious.
It was literally dead in the water and shut down by Jim Jordan and Mike Johnson. Massie had to file a discharge petition and gather signatures to by pass them. and yes they were mostly Democrat signatures because most of the Republicans didn't have the balls to step out of line. The ones who did? MTG, Boebert and Mace just so happens to be the exact time Trump flipped on them.
Only then did it get to the floor for vote and passed 427-1

So by your standard John Cornyn is the most effective Republican Congressman?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChucktownWillie