Chris Nwuli of Rutgers

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,383
1,601
113
Given our Budget situation, we have no choice but to try to get players like this and hope Shaheen can get the player to max his potential. If you’re upset we can’t get better players who bring rankings; we can’t afford them. Otherwise we’d still have Hines.

The situation is what it is for us.
Just not sure how accurate that is - could have afforded Hines (and Clark) it seems, if they wanted to return (and neither may have wanted to be here). Would have just been a different type of roster build with less $$ to spread around on depth.
 

mdjpk3131

Redshirt
Feb 21, 2026
14
18
2
Given our Budget situation, we have no choice but to try to get players like this and hope Shaheen can get the player to max his potential. If you’re upset we can’t get better players who bring rankings; we can’t afford them. Otherwise we’d still have Hines.

The situation is what it is for us.
Exactly. Coach Holloway and his staff will hit on some and miss on others. If I said it once, I’ll say it again…until the NCAA gets some control over this “Pay for Play” disguised as NIL, the only formula that Seton Hall can implement is to identify hidden talent and players with undervalued skills. The coaching staff has to then coach them up and have it all mesh together. This is no easy task for any staff. Sad thing is the team and the entire Pirate Nation will experience the same turnover and task every year. It’s frustrating on all levels. Year to year, until something changes, our roster will be comprised of a blend of complimentary roles players from other Power 5 Conference programs and lower level starters. I have no doubt that Coach Holloway knows what he wants in his players and will get the absolute most out of them…get the players to buy into his process, play hard and unselfish basketball and let the results take care of themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seton75

hallwins

Senior
Sep 7, 2001
512
723
93
Just not sure how accurate that is - could have afforded Hines (and Clark) it seems, if they wanted to return (and neither may have wanted to be here). Would have just been a different type of roster build with less $$ to spread around on depth.
Hines ended up at UConn. We lose that battle 8 or 9 out of 10 times NIL or not.
 

Seton75

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
36,524
2,781
113
Just not sure how accurate that is - could have afforded Hines (and Clark) it seems, if they wanted to return (and neither may have wanted to be here). Would have just been a different type of roster build with less $$ to spread around on depth.
pretty sure Budd would have been hapoy to stay and both hines and sha knew we could not afford hines
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section112

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,383
1,601
113
Hines ended up at UConn. We lose that battle 8 or 9 out of 10 times NIL or not.
Agreed. But I'm not sure it was entirely about $$. Based on the accounts here, we could have paid both. Bud Boomer has been railing on this for years now. It is a roster allocation strategy issue, not a pure money issue.

Now if neither Hines nor Clark wanted to be here, that's another story. Seems at least one of them didn't want to be. Maybe both.
 

PirateBlue08

Senior
Jul 25, 2025
676
649
93
Agreed. But I'm not sure it was entirely about $$. Based on the accounts here, we could have paid both. Bud Boomer has been railing on this for years now. It is a roster allocation strategy issue, not a pure money issue.

Now if neither Hines nor Clark wanted to be here, that's another story. Seems at least one of them didn't want to be. Maybe both.
Sure we could afford both if we’re playing 2 on 2.
 

BrklynGrad

Sophomore
Feb 1, 2026
178
118
43
The money available to players is bizarre.

But we never---or very rarely----- got kids who could go to Kentucky or Duke..... or Villanova in the day before NIL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NIL BAD

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
29,998
11,288
113
The money available to players is bizarre.

But we never---or very rarely----- got kids who could go to Kentucky or Duke..... or Villanova in the day before NIL.
The bigger issue for SHU is the immediate transfer rule. A school like ours loses big time because of annual free agency.

The money issue was always there, but the order of magnitude has made the difference worse.
 

HallX2

Senior
Mar 25, 2005
2,640
846
73
Agreed. But I'm not sure it was entirely about $$. Based on the accounts here, we could have paid both. Bud Boomer has been railing on this for years now. It is a roster allocation strategy issue, not a pure money issue.

Now if neither Hines nor Clark wanted to be here, that's another story. Seems at least one of them didn't want to be. Maybe both.
If they got the rumored money they wanted I think without question they made the right decision. Now they need to manage this nest egg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HALL85
Feb 9, 2005
217
386
63
Agreed. But I'm not sure it was entirely about $$. Based on the accounts here, we could have paid both. Bud Boomer has been railing on this for years now. It is a roster allocation strategy issue, not a pure money issue.

Now if neither Hines nor Clark wanted to be here, that's another story. Seems at least one of them didn't want to be. Maybe both.
It was the money, in both cases. Quite a bit more, in one case.
 

NIL BAD

Junior
Aug 15, 2025
347
304
63
The bigger issue for SHU is the immediate transfer rule. A school like ours loses big time because of annual free agency.

The money issue was always there, but the order of magnitude has made the difference worse.

Outside of the Whitehead year, our HS recruiting has been really bad since Amaker left. The portal can be a real weapon with great scouting. The key is holding onto the players we want to keep at a reasonable cost. I was a huge Budd & Hines fan all year long but the $ they supposedly received makes no sense based on our current resources.
 
  • Like
Reactions: donnie-baseball