NCAA proposed rule change just doubles the stakes for Mark Pope

CRZ4UK

All-American
Jun 6, 2008
4,980
9,948
103
That reasoning didn’t really make sense. Very few players spend 4 years in college now. Then get drafted high. A four or 5 year college player usually isn’t NBA material. The article makes it sound like guys would stay put 5 years and develop for their NBA career. That’s horse poopie.
 

preacherfan

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2003
29,019
4,621
113
I really don't understand the article. I don't really see how anything changes other than we are eliminating all the hoopla of redshirting and applying for a 6th or 7th year, etc. It also eliminates bringing in a 30 year old G-league player. To me, it just simplifies everything. Having said that, why does this affect UK more than any other program?
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,191
98,325
113
Give them two max transfers. They all get one no matter one, and only get another if the coach leaves. No exceptions. Give them five years to finish.

I'm all for players getting paid, but they also need to take some accountability with their decisions. If you can't get it right after one transfer, that's on you.
 

BigBlue_83

Senior
Dec 4, 2025
185
410
63
Give them two max transfers. They all get one no matter one, and only get another if the coach leaves. No exceptions. Give them five years to finish.

I'm all for players getting paid, but they also need to take some accountability with their decisions. If you can't get it right after one transfer, that's on you.
That and put a cap on how much they can make