We don't get her if we still have Deal, so thats the one to compare to.Just replaced a guard that never scored 20 points in 5 years with an All SEC guard that scored 20+ points 13 times last year alone as a sophomore. I'm gonna stick my neck way out there and call this an upgrade.
Oh I agree that Deal probably had to go, but its Kylie's minutes that she'll be taking next year. That's the same Kylie that went 1 for 22 the last 4 games of the year.We don't get her if we still have Deal, so thats the one to compare to.
Yes but Kylies role was defensive stopper. No different than Pretty eyesOh I agree that Deal probably had to go, but its Kylie's minutes that she'll be taking next year. That's the same Kylie that went 1 for 22 the last 4 games of the year.
Gabbie? LolYes but Kylies role was defensive stopper. No different than Pretty eyes![]()
Shhh, let them be weird about it.Gabbie? Lol
I know this is the Dani Commitment thread - she is going to be a heck of a player.Gabbie? Lol
Based on the way she played tonight, MW might be the 3/4 answer.Well that is quite something.
Id like to have a deep threat at the 3 but TS could be more of a threat with Dani as the 2.
I think Iowa is one more really dynamic 3 or 4 from elevating.
Jan was quoted yesterday saying that Taylor is more suited to play the 3. I think JJ knew Carnigie was coming.Well that is quite something.
Id like to have a deep threat at the 3 but TS could be more of a threat with Dani as the 2.
I think Iowa is one more really dynamic 3 or 4 from elevating.
I really appreciated Kylie's defensive prowess, but she was absolutely brutal the last half of the year at the offensive end of the floor.Yes but Kylies role was defensive stopper. No different than Pretty eyes![]()
Exactly.Jan was quoted yesterday saying that Taylor is more suited to play the 3. I think JJ knew Carnigie was coming.
A few back ups and were settled at 1, 2, and 3.
This is a great get.
I’m not completely sold on TS as starting at 3. She’s 5-9 so it’s more of a 3g offense. But having a dynamic 2g may take more burden off her.Exactly.
I know you're not, and that's ok. She's 5-10 and a true 3 level scorer that can take it to the rim, a much better fit at the 3 than McCabe ever was.I’m not completely sold on TS as starting at 3. She’s 5-9 so it’s more of a 3g offense. But having a dynamic 2g may take more burden off her.
The bigger issue is who starts at 4.
It would seem recruiter LaSondra Barrett is killing it.
I would call it an upgrade.We don't get her if we still have Deal, so thats the one to compare to.
Plus chit chat and her have chemistry together.I would call it an upgrade.
Deal was more interested in the money & playing time.
Who knows what Emely's problem was.
Bottom line is both were bad fits.
Who? LOLawesome! Now go get Jordan Soriser!
Gordon SorcererWho? LOL
But remember both of her moves were due to coaching changes.This is awesome news! Man, though, another three schools in three years. Hope we can keep her here the rest of her eligibility