Corruption and Rooting it Out

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,606
12,517
113
There's been a lot of talk about Barnhart's ludicrously lucrative retirement BS that happened to go into effect right after he inked us a nasty deal with JMI for the next 14 years.

JMI, now having fired Dave Baker and making itself even more hated by Kentucky fans, seems to think it can act with impunity... A trend we've seen a lot, as of late.

JMI itself is just a licensing entity, so we can't really boycott it. However, we can pressure its corporate sponsors for change. Kroger, Central Bank, KY Farm Bureau, Paul Miller Ford, and many more all have corporate agreements with JMI. We can speak to those sponsors with emails and calls, but also with $$$.

Reducing cash flow from licensed apparel and ticket sales would also send a strong message, although that could harm the student athletes and coaches trying their best despite a drowning situation.

To remedy this JMI situation, I suspect we could get out of the contract due to the serious conflict of interest between Rachel Baker, Executive Associate AD, and her husband, Brandon Baker, a high-ranking executive at JMI. HOWEVER, that would require consistent contact from fans to both Capilouto as well as the Board of Trustees. Outside of that, the University being a public entity, we must also contact representatives in the state and demand investigations into this corruption. The conflict of interest is too great to ignore, and is one of avenues that again, I suspect could be used to get UK out of this deal that CLEARLY gives JMI too much authority while providing absolutely no transparency.

Barnhart got us into this JMI mess, created two terrible contracts, made multiple horrific hires, saw the downturn of UK basketball twice, and abdicated too much control to his head coaches, yet comes away clean. Something is rotten in Lexington, and it needs to come to light.

That's it. That's the post.

Go Big Blue.
 

fisherscatfan

All-Conference
Jan 17, 2010
1,068
2,313
113
The corruption isn’t simply a Barnhart problem. It is a University of Kentucky culture issue. The BOT, President, Athletic Department are all in this together. None of this nonsense gets accomplished without the cooperation of all 3. It is a club and they take care of their own.

Soon there will be more calls for donations/NIL so they can keep the gravy train running.
 
Last edited:

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,606
12,517
113
The corruption isn’t simply a Barnhart problem. It is a University of Kentucky culture issue. The BOT, President, Athletic Department are all in this together. None of this nonsense gets accomplished without the cooperation of all 3. It is a club and they take care of their own.

Soon there will be more calls for donations/NIL so they can keep the gravy train running.
Hence the following:
Outside of that, the University being a public entity, we must also contact representatives in the state and demand investigations into this corruption.
The state is full of corruption and BS as well, but at least they're beholden to voters.
 

CRZ4UK

All-American
Jun 6, 2008
4,932
9,892
103
Our Governor just spent 167,000 dollars on a vacation for his family and we were denied even being able to access those records. UK has been corrupt for a while. They would build a building on top of another building. Construction has always been the easiest way to lander money. Jurich expanded a stadium 3 times that he couldn’t fill in the first place.
Mitch is as bad as Jurich was except he didn’t even care about winning. Just filling everyone’s pockets and staying profitable. This isn’t new.
 

legalbeagle123

Heisman
Jun 16, 2001
28,724
23,159
113
Below is a copy and paste that I sent to the Board of Trustees.

Ms. Hardwick, I am writing to you to express my extreme displeasure about the recent news involving Mitch Barnhart and his new "Executive in Residence" position. As a proud alumnus of UK and donor, this contractual agreement is personally repulsive. I believe serious questions need to be asked. Is this new position of "Executive in Residence" actually needed? Or is it just some manufactured "job" that Mr. Barnhart envisioned and created for himself? Why is he getting paid $950,000.00 per year for this position when his current salary is only $660,000.00? What exactly is he going to do as an "Executive in Residence?" Am I wrong in thinking that the University of Kentucky Athletics Department has somehow managed to operate for its entire existence up to this point without an "Executive in Residence" position? Did the Board of Trustees vote to approve this?

I am a fervent reader of multiple UK message boards. I can tell you with 100% certainty that I have yet to see anyone who is not completely outraged over this ridiculous (and totally UNDESERVED) golden parachute. I will be exercising extreme caution going forward before another dime of my money is donated to my alma mater.
 

TigerMoving

Heisman
Jul 13, 2014
7,897
21,853
113
Literally any person on the planet, if allowed to be AD at a P5 university for 24 years, would eventually win a championship or two. What Mitch accomplished at UK would be very impressive if it was over an 8 year stretch but there is nothing impressive about his tenure giving the length of time he had. 1 basketball championship in 24 years is an outright failure. Nothing he has done deserves anything more than a pat on the back and a "thanks for trying, good bye."
 

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,606
12,517
113
Below is a copy and paste that I sent to the Board of Trustees.

Ms. Hardwick, I am writing to you to express my extreme displeasure about the recent news involving Mitch Barnhart and his new "Executive in Residence" position. As a proud alumnus of UK and donor, this contractual agreement is personally repulsive. I believe serious questions need to be asked. Is this new position of "Executive in Residence" actually needed? Or is it just some manufactured "job" that Mr. Barnhart envisioned and created for himself? Why is he getting paid $950,000.00 per year for this position when his current salary is only $660,000.00? What exactly is he going to do as an "Executive in Residence?" Am I wrong in thinking that the University of Kentucky Athletics Department has somehow managed to operate for its entire existence up to this point without an "Executive in Residence" position? Did the Board of Trustees vote to approve this?

I am a fervent reader of multiple UK message boards. I can tell you with 100% certainty that I have yet to see anyone who is not completely outraged over this ridiculous (and totally UNDESERVED) golden parachute. I will be exercising extreme caution going forward before another dime of my money is donated to my alma mater.
Very well written.

I'll be sending my own correspondence and again, I'd recommend everyone to do the same to state reps, BOT, and Eli. This is unacceptable and they need to know there will be consequences from the fanbase if they don't unf**k themselves post-haste.
 

Wunky

Heisman
Jan 16, 2021
4,340
17,997
78
BUMP.

Mitch Barnhart has absolutely sold UK Athletics down the road, and this $2 million exit he’s making is so clearly JMI scratching his back that there should be criminal charges filed YESTERDAY. UK can’t even get their story straight about where the money is coming from! This is good ol boy **** to the Nth degree, and Eli has enabled all of it. Our ancestors would have tarred and feathered these parasites.
 

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
44,707
80,489
113
BUMP.

Mitch Barnhart has absolutely sold UK Athletics down the road, and this $2 million exit he’s making is so clearly JMI scratching his back that there should be criminal charges filed YESTERDAY. UK can’t even get their story straight about where the money is coming from! This is good ol boy **** to the Nth degree, and Eli has enabled all of it. Our ancestors would have tarred and feathered these parasites.
Yup and all of our so called representatives too. We are so done as a nation is sickens me. Nobody will do what is actually needed to fix these issues. Not until the collapse is complete.
 

ZaytovenCat

All-American
Apr 25, 2013
23,880
8,404
97
I’ve thought from the beginning Mitch was dirty as hell with the insane contracts he’s given out. He’s absolutely getting something out of these sweetheart deals that he handed out that repeatedly screwed UK. At the same time you also have to think Eli is also corrupt and getting kickbacks or is just completely incompetent for never once reprimanding or firing Barnhart for all the bs that’s gone on under him the last 5-7 years. There’s not another AD in the SEC that would have survived if they’d done what Mitch has the last 7 years.

As for JMI, their contract should be voided or Rachel Baker be fired. I’d prefer JMI go f themselves and screw some other school but Baker getting fired would be a nice consolation prize.
 

Henogee1975

All-American
Jan 31, 2017
4,314
8,327
87
Our Governor just spent 167,000 dollars on a vacation for his family and we were denied even being able to access those records. UK has been corrupt for a while. They would build a building on top of another building. Construction has always been the easiest way to lander money. Jurich expanded a stadium 3 times that he couldn’t fill in the first place.
Mitch is as bad as Jurich was except he didn’t even care about winning. Just filling everyone’s pockets and staying profitable. This isn’t new.
Do you have a link for the $167,000 trip?
 
Jul 6, 2025
2,140
6,462
113
You'd be amazed what a thousand pissed off phone calls and emails can do, but also, I addressed that in the original post and a subsequent response.

Unfortunately won't do a thing. Those companies will never stop advertising with UK. Even if one or two did, those slots would quickly get filled.

Jmi was basically untouchable the moment UK signed that insane deal
 

UKGrad24

All-American
Apr 2, 2024
2,808
6,779
100
The corruption isn’t simply a Barnhart problem. It is a University of Kentucky culture issue. The BOT, President, Athletic Department are all in this together. None of this nonsense gets accomplished without the cooperation of all 3. It is a club and they take care of their own.

Soon there will be more calls for donations/NIL so they can keep the gravy train running.
Kentucky has a major corruption problem this is exactly it.

Barnhart was the face that took the beating so they could focus everything in that direction. How else do people think a guy hated as AD as much as that guy was able to stay 24 years? No AD stays that long, not many in this conference in the modern era. Barnhart even says his plan was to stay 6-8 years. What changed? Kentucky cleared out a lot of Kentucky people and began to focus on outsiders and profits, building, and lucrative aspects to the university system. Competitive sports are just a tool they use to do it. And what they want is no mess, little news, keep things quiet and move forward.

Well guys like Calipari Pearl Pitino etc don’t keep things quiet and it’s risky. They don’t want the attention. They want money. Look at the swim team, where did that go? Away quickly. Anyone fired? Nope.

The point of Mitch was to have a man in place that wouldn’t rock the boat and would be a point man in the athletic department to do what the powers that be want him to do with athletics. Winning was never Mitch’s job. And that’s why they focused on those little sports, it’s easy nobody else cares. That’s how he managed to keep that job and why he didn’t leave. He’s a sell out.

We traded a good boy network who loves Kentucky and wanted to win, for a good boy network of outsider hacks, financial administrators, men who sacrifice our sports (JMI) for profits. They could do both but they focus on the money and nothing, including our basketball program, will get in the way of that. Don’t think they want the boosters giving all that money to recruits, nope. They hate the NIL. That’s why Mitch did everything he could to redirect that in any way he could and that’s why he signed that JMI deal. To lock the players into JMI where the university wouldn’t lose out. They don’t care about winning at all. Mitch wants to project ethics as a reason we don’t compete at those levels, it’s greed. It’s always the guy who pretends he’s above it you have to watch.

all imo.
 

FilsonCat

All-Conference
Apr 5, 2007
3,305
3,863
113
Just another feather in his failure hat.

It’s mind boggling how some jut think he should take another $4M from UK. Just mind boggling.
Is it really a failure for him? He seems to be adept at taking care of his own interests. In that way, is he really that much different than Tom Jurich was(aside from the fact that Jurich was hell bent on winning at UL)? MB is just much better at the plausible deniability game, and in hiding his business behind fig leaves.

The entire Commonwealth is being let down by Capilouto and the BOT for sanctioning the new position.
 

CRZ4UK

All-American
Jun 6, 2008
4,932
9,892
103
Kentucky has a major corruption problem this is exactly it.

Barnhart was the face that took the beating so they could focus everything in that direction. How else do people think a guy hated as AD as much as that guy was able to stay 24 years? No AD stays that long, not many in this conference in the modern era. Barnhart even says his plan was to stay 6-8 years. What changed? Kentucky cleared out a lot of Kentucky people and began to focus on outsiders and profits, building, and lucrative aspects to the university system. Competitive sports are just a tool they use to do it. And what they want is no mess, little news, keep things quiet and move forward.

Well guys like Calipari Pearl Pitino etc don’t keep things quiet and it’s risky. They don’t want the attention. They want money. Look at the swim team, where did that go? Away quickly. Anyone fired? Nope.

The point of Mitch was to have a man in place that wouldn’t rock the boat and would be a point man in the athletic department to do what the powers that be want him to do with athletics. Winning was never Mitch’s job. And that’s why they focused on those little sports, it’s easy nobody else cares. That’s how he managed to keep that job and why he didn’t leave. He’s a sell out.

We traded a good boy network who loves Kentucky and wanted to win, for a good boy network of outsider hacks, financial administrators, men who sacrifice our sports (JMI) for profits. They could do both but they focus on the money and nothing, including our basketball program, will get in the way of that. Don’t think they want the boosters giving all that money to recruits, nope. They hate the NIL. That’s why Mitch did everything he could to redirect that in any way he could and that’s why he signed that JMI deal. To lock the players into JMI where the university wouldn’t lose out. They don’t care about winning at all. Mitch wants to project ethics as a reason we don’t compete at those levels, it’s greed. It’s always the guy who pretends he’s above it you have to watch.

all imo.
I’ve been saying every word of that for around 6-7 years now. Almost no one believed me.
Im pretty sure it goes even deeper than that. Look at the SEC the last 3 years. If a team sitting on the bubble needs a win they can upset the best team instantly. Everyone has a semi even record. Everything is for money. I have tuned out 50% this year. Soon I won’t even know UK is playing and that’s fine by me. I miss it, but what’s the point if it isn’t real. The officials can’t be that bad. Games are held close for excitement and teams are gifted calls on who can get in and what the fan engagement is. We are watching the WWE.
 

FatCatMan

All-Conference
Feb 19, 2026
1,355
3,222
113
Kentucky fans enable this crap. We do nothing but blindly support the program, buying merchandise and going to games and watching the games on TV while consuming the advertisements like a bunch of lemmings.

Other hardcore fans don’t allow their programs to be washed by mediocrity while many of the jackasses in our fanbase police the tone of fans who won’t stand for this BS, demanding blind utmost loyalty to the program and therefore the administration that is driving our basketball team into the dumps.

Why? Because they’re good little boys and girls who think we should always be kind? Afraid of other fanbases judging us as being too unrealistic? What is so unrealistic as expecting to be in the hunt like the Dukes and UConns of the world? Why is that so unrealistic when we’re spending millions to be worse than 6th in the league every freaking year?

We won’t do anything. The fanbase is poisoned. We’re as consumed mediocrity as much as the UK’s admin is.
 

Seth_C

All-American
Mar 12, 2017
4,595
8,158
96
The corruption isn’t simply a Barnhart problem. It is a University of Kentucky culture issue. The BOT, President, Athletic Department are all in this together. None of this nonsense gets accomplished without the cooperation of all 3. It is a club and they take care of their own.

Soon there will be more calls for donations/NIL so they can keep the gravy train running.
As a third generation Kentucky basketball fan, and a descendant of some of its earliest settlers, they can get ******.

I am nearly to the point of not watching at all. The entire sport is fixed. It’s no longer entertaining, and I’ve already stopped watching anythibg except Kentucky games. Next up is I stop watching Kentucky sports also, and I’m very very close to that point right now. I’m sure I am not the only one.

I sure hope the ******* gambling addicts can keep the sport alive.
 

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,606
12,517
113
Unfortunately won't do a thing. Those companies will never stop advertising with UK. Even if one or two did, those slots would quickly get filled.
Who's going to be clamoring to fill a volatile vacancy that'll get them in hot water with a hornets nest of BBN? We cannot let fatalism win the day. We have to know that we can effect change and act.
 

UKGrad24

All-American
Apr 2, 2024
2,808
6,779
100
Who's going to be clamoring to fill a volatile vacancy that'll get them in hot water with a hornets nest of BBN? We cannot let fatalism win the day. We have to know that we can effect change and act.
Nothing is more powerful than collective action. It’s why you either get things done or you don’t. From local to federal, from sports to government. If you have collective action you have everything, if you don’t have it, you have nothing. 1 man isn’t changing the system yet people continue this belief, collectively we do change it. BBN as a whole has enormous power. It literally just removed Mitch Barnhart from a seat he wanted for 2 more years and even though he’s hand picked by hacks like this president, it wasn’t enough. Because collectively, too many wanted him out. The theory literally just proved itself.

Think since stein presser. They kept promoting Mitch, and he gave a hire he knows would be popular. He was trying to stay in power. But too many wanted him gone, it didn’t work, and he had to finally remove himself. And that BOT and President do not want people to know they caused it to happen. If Mitch had wide support from BBN he’d be here two more.
 

Runt#1969

All-American
Dec 13, 2010
21,134
8,594
113
Below is a copy and paste that I sent to the Board of Trustees.

Ms. Hardwick, I am writing to you to express my extreme displeasure about the recent news involving Mitch Barnhart and his new "Executive in Residence" position. As a proud alumnus of UK and donor, this contractual agreement is personally repulsive. I believe serious questions need to be asked. Is this new position of "Executive in Residence" actually needed? Or is it just some manufactured "job" that Mr. Barnhart envisioned and created for himself? Why is he getting paid $950,000.00 per year for this position when his current salary is only $660,000.00? What exactly is he going to do as an "Executive in Residence?" Am I wrong in thinking that the University of Kentucky Athletics Department has somehow managed to operate for its entire existence up to this point without an "Executive in Residence" position? Did the Board of Trustees vote to approve this?

I am a fervent reader of multiple UK message boards. I can tell you with 100% certainty that I have yet to see anyone who is not completely outraged over this ridiculous (and totally UNDESERVED) golden parachute. I will be exercising extreme caution going forward before another dime of my money is donated to my alma mater.
Amen

/signed
 
Jul 6, 2025
2,140
6,462
113
Who's going to be clamoring to fill a volatile vacancy that'll get them in hot water with a hornets nest of BBN? We cannot let fatalism win the day. We have to know that we can effect change and act.

Anyone who wants state wide reach. I know a boycott sounds good on paper, but it just wont work in this situation.

However if you want to go the civil protest route, focus on his sex scandal. Mitch was warned in writing of sexual abuse by a UK coach and did nothing while it continued. Its unbelievable he survived, but instead he turned it all into a massive windfall. That trumps every other massive failure under his tenure and should get some groups rightfully up in arms.

@legalbeagle123 has the right approach. The board is the best hope because no one should've approved what is essentially a 5 million dollar gift and it damn sure shouldn't be coming from the athletic department at a time when they are under a massive pinch.

The only other avenue is via state legislature since this is our tax dollars, but that isnt happening. None of those people are committing career suicide by attacking the school over this.
 

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,606
12,517
113
Anyone who wants state wide reach. I know a boycott sounds good on paper, but it just wont work in this situation.
I agree with everything but this point. Any amount of pressure that's significant enough to cause a major corporate sponsor to back out will likely give any additional companies pause or preclude us from future opportunities until the situation cools. JMO.


However if you want to go the civil protest route, focus on his sex scandal. Mitch was warned in writing of sexual abuse by a UK coach and did nothing while it continued. Its unbelievable he survived, but instead he turned it all into a massive windfall. That trumps every other massive failure under his tenure and should get some groups rightfully up in arms.

@legalbeagle123 has the right approach. The board is the best hope because no one should've approved what is essentially a 5 million dollar gift and it damn sure shouldn't be coming from the athletic department at a time when they are under a massive pinch.

The only other avenue is via state legislature since this is our tax dollars, but that isnt happening. None of those people are committing career suicide by attacking the school over this.
Spot on, IMO, but again, pressure from constituents would suggest that action would be rewarded come election time. JMO, of course. At the very least, we need to be doing *something*.
 
Last edited:

Ky_Bred_Cat

All-Conference
Dec 28, 2014
2,147
3,995
113
Thank you JPF for putting this back out there. There's just too much smoke here to ignore - JMI, golden parachutes, unexplainable decision making, etc.

How long until that JMI troll shows up here again? That was fun. Actually, that would be a positive sign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runt#1969

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,606
12,517
113
  • Like
Reactions: Ky_Bred_Cat

Bluesbrother

All-American
May 23, 2002
4,603
6,534
113
There's been a lot of talk about Barnhart's ludicrously lucrative retirement BS that happened to go into effect right after he inked us a nasty deal with JMI for the next 14 years.

JMI, now having fired Dave Baker and making itself even more hated by Kentucky fans, seems to think it can act with impunity... A trend we've seen a lot, as of late.

JMI itself is just a licensing entity, so we can't really boycott it. However, we can pressure its corporate sponsors for change. Kroger, Central Bank, KY Farm Bureau, Paul Miller Ford, and many more all have corporate agreements with JMI. We can speak to those sponsors with emails and calls, but also with $$$.

Reducing cash flow from licensed apparel and ticket sales would also send a strong message, although that could harm the student athletes and coaches trying their best despite a drowning situation.

To remedy this JMI situation, I suspect we could get out of the contract due to the serious conflict of interest between Rachel Baker, Executive Associate AD, and her husband, Brandon Baker, a high-ranking executive at JMI. HOWEVER, that would require consistent contact from fans to both Capilouto as well as the Board of Trustees. Outside of that, the University being a public entity, we must also contact representatives in the state and demand investigations into this corruption. The conflict of interest is too great to ignore, and is one of avenues that again, I suspect could be used to get UK out of this deal that CLEARLY gives JMI too much authority while providing absolutely no transparency.

Barnhart got us into this JMI mess, created two terrible contracts, made multiple horrific hires, saw the downturn of UK basketball twice, and abdicated too much control to his head coaches, yet comes away clean. Something is rotten in Lexington, and it needs to come to light.

That's it. That's the post.

Go Big Blue.
UK's Athletic Dept has been a "Good Ole Boys Club" piggy bank for legions of Admin grifters for many years ... JMO. This sweetheart deal for Barnhart is just the next chapter. Makes me sick. JMI should be kicked to the curb. At a minimum there should be an annual audit conducted by someone interested in truth and not paid off ... JMO. David Roselle was the last University President that cleaned out this den of grifters. Roselle also "forced" AD CM Newton to get back on the plane, return to Pitino and, face-to-face, offer the coaching job to him, which he didn't do on the first trip while trying to intimate (lied) to Roselle that he did. Newton and his den of grifters had a back-door plan to install Newton as the new UK BB coach. Roselle wasn't having it. This all occurred shortly after the Emory package scandal and Roselle was hired, in large part, to clean up the cluster at UK. I wouldn't trust any of those clowns with access to UK money.
 

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,606
12,517
113
Corruption? Mitch cant compare to a couple of past ADs. Old timers know.
Corruption. I applied to several research support roles at UK and when budget cuts came through early in 2025, was told there was no money, so the positions were shelved "indefinitely". So, there's no research support in at least one department because Mitch is taking up at least 21 times that salary and now the grad students and post-docs are screwed.

I don't doubt there's been a long history of BS, though.
 

Woodrow24

Heisman
Dec 21, 2015
6,310
15,309
78
Corruption. I applied to several research support roles at UK and when budget cuts came through early in 2025, was told there was no money, so the positions were shelved "indefinitely". So, there's no research support in at least one department because Mitch is taking up at least 21 times that salary and now the grad students and post-docs are screwed.

I don't doubt there's been a long history of BS, though.
I mentioned this in another thread, but it’s very strange that UK is giving 2 million more dollars than they are contractually obligated to give. With a “budget crunch” that’s very strange
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
41,464
63,301
113
Thank you Mitch for your hard work and service to the Commonwealth. If only we could all be so successful.
 

Vek96

All-Conference
Jul 4, 2025
2,374
4,932
113
There's been a lot of talk about Barnhart's ludicrously lucrative retirement BS that happened to go into effect right after he inked us a nasty deal with JMI for the next 14 years.

JMI, now having fired Dave Baker and making itself even more hated by Kentucky fans, seems to think it can act with impunity... A trend we've seen a lot, as of late.

JMI itself is just a licensing entity, so we can't really boycott it. However, we can pressure its corporate sponsors for change. Kroger, Central Bank, KY Farm Bureau, Paul Miller Ford, and many more all have corporate agreements with JMI. We can speak to those sponsors with emails and calls, but also with $$$.

Reducing cash flow from licensed apparel and ticket sales would also send a strong message, although that could harm the student athletes and coaches trying their best despite a drowning situation.

To remedy this JMI situation, I suspect we could get out of the contract due to the serious conflict of interest between Rachel Baker, Executive Associate AD, and her husband, Brandon Baker, a high-ranking executive at JMI. HOWEVER, that would require consistent contact from fans to both Capilouto as well as the Board of Trustees. Outside of that, the University being a public entity, we must also contact representatives in the state and demand investigations into this corruption. The conflict of interest is too great to ignore, and is one of avenues that again, I suspect could be used to get UK out of this deal that CLEARLY gives JMI too much authority while providing absolutely no transparency.

Barnhart got us into this JMI mess, created two terrible contracts, made multiple horrific hires, saw the downturn of UK basketball twice, and abdicated too much control to his head coaches, yet comes away clean. Something is rotten in Lexington, and it needs to come to light.

That's it. That's the post.

Go Big Blue.
Barnhart should go to prison. He’s perhaps the worst thing to ever happen to Kentucky basketball.