Have you ever seen Manning looking happy?I think Nebraska is probably happy with their seeds.
Have you ever seen Manning looking happy?I think Nebraska is probably happy with their seeds.
Because that would eat far too many of the max allowable 16 competition dates for every team.Just a thought. Since there doesn't seem to be a brain trust available (other than Roar) who can be trusted and is available to seed the Big10 wrestling tournament with some sort of objective integrity why not make the Big10 schedule a complete round robin and seed them based on records with a criteria to break ties.
I like that wrestlers who ducked are penalized harshly, but not the guys (like Levi) who were the recipients of the duckers.In reality, much of this mess was caused by the coaches that allow the ducking in the first place.
Seeding is easier to fix than the ducking.In reality, much of this mess was caused by the coaches that allow the ducking in the first place.
Overtime and loooong timeouts when a wrestling match is following it on BTN.What’s basketball?
It has been suggested that it is the math. The math was fine. The formula which is used to let the math be the math is; absolutely, completely and moronically designed.Not sure if this was already talked about out in this thread already but on what planet does Illinois 125 Spencer Moore get the #2 seed over Bouzakis!??
Moore is 14-6, Bouzakis 1 loss in SV to the #1. Moore has a loss to Dean Peterson, who Bouzakis has beaten twice including via pin once, and has losses to Tyler Klinksy of Rider and Mack Mauger of Missouri. His best win is over Jacob Moran 5-2 in SV who Bouzakis majored 11-2.
So better record, 5 less losses and best overall loss, way better wins including majoring the guys best win… how on earth would any metric place him above Bouzakis!??
This and the Levi situation should IMMEDIATELY scrap this whack *** system. It literally is adding up the amount of matches someone wrestles (quantity) over quality. It’s basically saying if you wrestle 30 matches and lose 10 of them, that will put you ahead of someone who is 13-1.
Don't want a true round Robin, fine. Rank the wrestlers based on conference records. If you miss a match, for seeding purposes it is a loss. Everybody then gets ranked on a 8 match record. Ties are broken based on HTH, add criteria steps below HTH for breaking ties.Because that would eat far too many of the max allowable 16 competition dates for every team.
That in turn would suppress NCAA seeds for B10 qualifiers, since Quality Wins (and possibly RPI) would be low relative to the field.
Are you saying that you are Corby or Mineo..?At the expense of patting myself on the back ... I pointed this out 45 min before Kozak did. (Compare the timestamp on post #75 above.)
Coincidence?
I was thinking similarly this morning. Break the Big 10 portion of the criteria into three parts; H2H, conference dual win percentage, number of wins in conference duals (to penalize ducking). This component should be 70-80% of the total. Rest comprises overall competition; coaches rank, RPI, number of quality wins, and maybe conference allocation. I’ll let someone more knowledgeable assign the weightingIt has been suggested that it is the math. The math was fine. The formula which is used to let the math be the math is; absolutely, completely and moronically designed.
The formula is no doubtedly designed in a manner someone believed was darn near genius, but is really just silly stuff with overthought. The two most important measurables should have been conference W-L record and conference competitions. If a kid competed in every competition and has the best record, there doesn't need to be any additional measurements. He is first seed.
If there is a tie in records, HTH should be the tie breaker.
It's not the caffeine.I like his enthusiasm and knowledge, but for his own sake needs to reduce the caffeine intake.
I think at the coaches meeting Cael should volunteer all PSU guys be seeded 14th, in order to score the most points at the B10 tournament ever. The finals would take place around noon on Saturday and fans could head home early if they wanted too as well as ruining the whole 2 days for the B10. Karma for this seeding mess baby!Just a thought. Since there doesn't seem to be a brain trust available (other than Roar) who can be trusted and is available to seed the Big10 wrestling tournament with some sort of objective integrity why not make the Big10 schedule a complete round robin and seed them based on records with a criteria to break ties.
That was so bad. I saw the video just now. What was the ref watching?The brother had a bad moment but what may have been even worse was the lack of integrity showed by his Dad and Mcknight.
My wife actually went to a different floor in our house when I was watching the preseeds because she couldn't stand to listen to him, LOL. His schtick reminds me of that MMA commentator/interviewer that calls himself "The Schmo."I like his enthusiasm and knowledge, but for his own sake needs to reduce the caffeine intake.
Agree, but the seeding "punishment" should not unduly penalize the top seeded guys in the bracket. That's the dumbest aspect of seeding Cannon at #7 and Ferrari at #8. Same logic applies for seeding Starocci at #9 in the 2024 NCAA tourney. As stated by another poster, put the "punished" guys at the #6 seed to at least reduce impact to the top seeds, algorithm be damned.I like that wrestlers who ducked are penalized harshly, but not the guys (like Levi) who were the recipients of the duckers.
ExactlyI was thinking similarly this morning. Break the Big 10 portion of the criteria into three parts; H2H, conference dual win percentage, number of wins in conference duals (to penalize ducking). This component should be 70-80% of the total. Rest comprises overall competition; coaches rank, RPI, number of quality wins, and maybe conference allocation. I’ll let someone more knowledgeable assign the weighting![]()
Those are the ones I’m thinking of. The others aren’t material to the consy. 6 and 11 would be the best placements and I agree. Ferrari isn’t dropping that far but cannon should go to the 6.We're still talking about seeding the B10 Tournament, right?
These guys could miss the entire months of November and December, and since B10 duals start in January, the only difference would be for guys who don't get an RPI, which is unlikely to drop a top guy into a low enough seed to cause a consi bomb.
In any case, the controversial seeds at 133, 165, and 174 won't change consis at all.
Cannon and Ferrari will have the biggest consi impact, but they got plenty of early-season matches. They missed conference action -- punishing that was an intended feature of the seeding. IMO they should move to 6 and 11 respectively in order to minimize that impact. Cannon maybe could happen. Seriously doubt Ferrari would get dropped that far.
Yep I read elsewhere that Haines was within 11 of Minto. 829 to 818. Nobody else said thatAre you saying that you are Corby or Mineo..?
So, this is all left to the coaches to sort out the night before the 2nd biggest tournament of the year when they’ve got nothing better to do. That suggests to me that not much if anything is likely to get fixed.Just wondering how Friday coaches meeting works.?
I assume that each team probably gets a few challenges regarding wrestler placement of their own wrestlers. Do they start at a specific weight and if coaches have issues ,they present points of issue. After listening a neutral coach(es)adjust.??
Above is just a guess by me. I would think the decision should be done by a 3rd party (Willie) but I don't think that is the situation.
Problem with lifetime achievements is figs at Oklahoma state this year and last year as well.The goal of the big ten is to get their best wrestlers to nationals with the best seeds. Also this should be graded on life time accomplishment and present year both in the mix.
Could you share where you read this? We're all interested in seeing the numbers.Yep I read elsewhere that Haines was within 11 of Minto. 829 to 818. Nobody else said that. Cael said he hadn't seen them yet and I knew
![]()
He was saying I read things elsewhere and claim them as my own . And I was stating what I knew that wasn't written anywhere prior to me saying it. No big deal just anotherCould you share where you read this? We're all interested in seeing the numbers.
His name wasn't entered.Problem with lifetime achievements is figs at Oklahoma state this year and last year as well.
Have you seen the actual numbers or not? If so please share. Public or not, if you've got them, let's see them.He was saying I read things elsewhere and claim them as my own . And I was stating what I knew that wasn't written anywhere prior to me saying it. No big deal just anotherwhos trying to make friends on the board by poking fun at me. And the #s are not public
That is just a theoretical example. Past ncaa champ, can't even make the lineup.His name wasn't entered.
How would I know minto is 829 and Levi 818. I'm not gonna share them sorry. Its how you guarantee yourself never seeing anything againHave you seen the actual numbers or not? If so please share. Public or not, if you've got them, let's see them.
You don’t think it is possible she used that as an excuse to get a break from being around you.My wife actually went to a different floor in our house when I was watching the preseeds because she couldn't stand to listen to him, LOL. His schtick reminds me of that MMA commentator/interviewer that calls himself "The Schmo."
If you know so much can you help out with some financial advice /stock tips or is this top level insight and knowledge you have only on useless stuff.Yep I read elsewhere that Haines was within 11 of Minto. 829 to 818. Nobody else said that. Cael said he hadn't seen them yet and I knew
![]()
Just an FYI... I don't poke fun at anyone to make friends, I just have issues that will not be solved on bulletin boards.He was saying I read things elsewhere and claim them as my own . And I was stating what I knew that wasn't written anywhere prior to me saying it. No big deal just anotherwhos trying to make friends on the board by poking fun at me. And the #s are not public
My opinion is wrestling information on a wrestling forum isn't uselessIf you know so much can you help out with some financial advice /stock tips or is this top level insight and knowledge you have only on useless stuff.
"Ferrari wrestling a dead Hulk Hogan" would make a terrific AI image generation prompt.Ferrari wrestling a dead Hogan would still probably be 1-1 after regulation.