Social Security information which may help you or your parents in the near future should your parents not have a financial person

PSUForever

All-Conference
Feb 17, 2007
1,410
1,429
113
This is true, but to be clear, you get it back after they recalculate your benefit at FRA. So you get it back spread out over your remaining years; it's not like you get it back as a lump sum.
It is my understanding that if you take SS benefits at 62 it is a lesser amount than at 65 and if you take it at 65 it is less than if you wait until 70. And that lesser amount continues for the duration that you take SS.

For example, to throw out hypothetical numbers. If your full SS benefits are $40,000 a year and you decide to take at 62 then it will be a percentage of that. I don't know what but let's say 75% so you get $30,000 every year unhanged. Then say if you take at 65 it is 80% of your full benefits (again, I don't know, just using that as an example). The point being I don't think you ever would get the $40,000 in full benefits since you took it early. Instead you get some percentage of your full benefits.

Is this correct or do I have this wrong?
 

Nittany.Lion

Senior
Jul 31, 2006
408
650
93
It is my understanding that if you take SS benefits at 62 it is a lesser amount than at 65 and if you take it at 65 it is less than if you wait until 70. And that lesser amount continues for the duration that you take SS.

For example, to throw out hypothetical numbers. If your full SS benefits are $40,000 a year and you decide to take at 62 then it will be a percentage of that. I don't know what but let's say 75% so you get $30,000 every year unhanged. Then say if you take at 65 it is 80% of your full benefits (again, I don't know, just using that as an example). The point being I don't think you ever would get the $40,000 in full benefits since you took it early. Instead you get some percentage of your full benefits.

Is this correct or do I have this wrong?
You have it right; my post was specific to those who lose benefits due to the earnings test because they continue to work.
 

82Lions

Redshirt
Oct 13, 2021
4
5
3
It is my understanding that if you take SS benefits at 62 it is a lesser amount than at 65 and if you take it at 65 it is less than if you wait until 70. And that lesser amount continues for the duration that you take SS.

For example, to throw out hypothetical numbers. If your full SS benefits are $40,000 a year and you decide to take at 62 then it will be a percentage of that. I don't know what but let's say 75% so you get $30,000 every year unhanged. Then say if you take at 65 it is 80% of your full benefits (again, I don't know, just using that as an example). The point being I don't think you ever would get the $40,000 in full benefits since you took it early. Instead you get some percentage of your full benefits.

Is this correct or do I have this wrong?
For each year before and after the full retirement age there is about a 8% difference. If your full retirement age is 67 then if you retire at 65 your monthly benefit is about 16% lower than if you waited until 67 to start collecting. Each year after you start collecting you receive the inflation adjustment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69

PSUForever

All-Conference
Feb 17, 2007
1,410
1,429
113
For each year before and after the full retirement age there is about a 8% difference. If your full retirement age is 67 then if you retire at 65 your monthly benefit is about 16% lower than if you waited until 67 to start collecting. Each year after you start collecting you receive the inflation adjustment.
Thank you that is helpful.