I care about the all time wins record. But I have also been accused of being what is wrong with the program because I am a realist on some things. For those who rail on "UK Standards" they fail to acknowledge that basketball was a different sport when most of those were set. They won't admit that the SEC that Pope contends with (in just his second season, 1st historically good) was not the SEC that their daddy's watched UK dominate. They argue that with NIL and transfer portal UK should just get anyone they want and dominate. But, NIL and the portal makes the other teams stronger than they used to be. Just like has been argued in football, teams cannot stockpile all the talent, it goes other places also, making other teams good and keeping UK from having all the talent that they used to have to set the "UK Standards".
Not that I don't think UK is living up to what they should be, currently or historically, but for it to be instantly, don't think it is realistic. Basketball teams on the whole is light years better across the board than it was just a few years ago, and playing in the SEC is eons different.
I know people point to whoever is the "hot" new team...AZ, Mich, BYU, Iowa St....but none of those teams play in the SEC nightly where there are no BAD teams. And teams like Houston, Kansas and others are built with returning players, who consistently improve. I think this is where Pope is headed, build a core that comes back....can't do that with one and dones. Patience and fewer injuries and I believe UK will be back at the top where they belong.
Duke....just doesn't fit any of this. They have NIKE, USA basketball and a weak ACC, so they will continue with Calipari's one and done model. They will occasionally break through, but man, that is an exhausting way to be a fan.