Is Virginia........

YouKay

Heisman
May 15, 2002
35,671
31,767
113
How about that Pack Line Defense?

Gardner-Webb shooting 59%.

[laughing][laughing]
 

KyCatFan1

Heisman
May 6, 2002
30,867
31,594
113
I just started watching and GW's offense is atrocious. How did they score 30? They are fouling like crazy now and will probably have issues because of that.
 

bbn93

Junior
Jun 6, 2017
315
383
0
Why is Virginia's style so effective during the regular season, then basically useless come tournament time?
 

akaukswoosh

Hall of Famer
Jan 14, 2006
81,790
125,745
93
Why is Virginia's style so effective during the regular season, then basically useless come tournament time?
They remind me of Tubby’s teams that could win the SEC with solid defense then get eliminated by some team they could not contain when they hit the Dance.
Of course a 1 losing to a 16 takes it to a new level of bad.
 

TheDude73

Heisman
Jan 7, 2006
24,290
24,053
113
Just tuned in (finally back in USA!!) and GW is up a bit on UVA late in 1st half. Not a believer in jinxes, so not worried about what I say here, but man wouldn't it be COMICAL if the first team to have lost as a 1 seed to a 16 did it back to back years?
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry

TomTraubertsBlues

All-American
Oct 13, 2014
4,919
8,259
113
Give up back to back 3s, then go down, pass up open 3s, drain the shot clock and get a 2. That's Bennett in a nutshell.
 

John Henry

Hall of Famer
Aug 18, 2007
35,574
172,795
113
If they lose, my bracket is toast (what was I thinking), but I don't even care - go GW
Me too. But Virginia losing to a 16 seed is much more important to me than my bracket. Virginia is a beast in the ACC but not so much outside of the conference.

But my fear is the refs will get the message at half time and put the brakes on GW
 
Jan 30, 2018
16,155
24,636
0
I can't imagine this will happen again. However, if this stays close for too long the panic might start to build for VA. Coming off losing to a 16 just last year doubt has to be creapin in.
 

UK90

Heisman
Dec 30, 2007
31,460
27,816
0
What's so bizarre about Bennett is that his success at Virginia is based almost entirely on his teams basically never losing to someone they shouldn't lose to. He wins all those games, mixes in a few wins against big dogs, and voila', Virginia is a 1 or 2 seed.

Then he gets in the tournament and can barely beat anyone. It's weird.

There's something psychological going on there.

His teams look SO well-coached and smart in the regular season, but then they always seem to tense up and play scared in the tourney.
 

rick64

Heisman
Jan 25, 2007
25,004
34,784
113
Refs will take over in the 2nd half. Can't let a 1 seed ACC team lose 1st round again.
 

know1

Heisman
Dec 8, 2002
12,855
14,925
0
Anybody believing in UVA ever must have a hole in their head. Bennett's system is not conducive to March Madness in any way, shape or form. I pray to God we never go after him when Cal leaves.

Care to elaborate how his "system" is not conducive?

His "system" is the pack line defense. I guess playing really good defense isn't good conducive to winning basketball games? They don't try to slow down the game on offense like everyone says. They slow it down on defense. And that's the point of defense.

I fully recognize they haven't been very successful, but I don't think it has to do with his system.
 

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
39,454
62,073
113
You really have to question Bennett and his system.. Even if they win this game. It works against **** teams and the bottom feeders and the ACC.. But UofL and UNC should have beat them.

And again I say.. Virginia is doing everything it can to help the ACC and Duke and UNC. It's like it's staged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry

StubbornPenny

All-American
Nov 2, 2009
10,562
9,892
0
Care to elaborate how his "system" is not conducive?

His "system" is the pack line defense. I guess playing really good defense isn't good conducive to winning basketball games? They don't try to slow down the game on offense like everyone says. They slow it down on defense. And that's the point of defense.

I fully recognize they haven't been very successful, but I don't think it has to do with his system.

Pack line gives up threes at an unreasonable rate. It was the rage before people truly knew the value of the 3. Couple that with the slow pace - 15 shots in 16 minutes is a slow pace - makes the 3 even more dangerous. Throw in the beer muscles and adrenaline of playing on the NCAAs, and now any given team can beat them because the system lets inferior teams gain confidence.

Pack Line sags on the three - the single most deadly weapon an inferior team has - and prevents penetration, which inferior teams can’t and weren’t gonna do anyway.

It IS the system!!
 

All Facts

Sophomore
Mar 22, 2019
37
125
0
Slow pace let’s lesser teams hang around. It’s why Cals approach drives us all crazy in the tournament.

If they lose again to a 16.... man that would almost irreparably damage Bennett’s reputation.
 

Ukbrassowtipin

Heisman
Aug 12, 2011
82,275
90,236
113
There's something psychological going on there.

His teams look SO well-coached and smart in the regular season, but then they always seem to tense up and play scared in the tourney.
Its him..have you ever seen him do anything than just stand on the sideline like a mouse? I think he coaches ppl to do a well refined system but he sucks at making an adjustment from that system if its needed.

And if a kid is just sucking *** at something he cant fix it.
 

know1

Heisman
Dec 8, 2002
12,855
14,925
0
Pack line gives up threes at an unreasonable rate. It was the rage before people truly knew the value of the 3. Couple that with the slow pace - 15 shots in 16 minutes is a slow pace - makes the 3 even more dangerous. Throw in the beer muscles and adrenaline of playing on the NCAAs, and now any given team can beat them because the system lets inferior teams gain confidence.

Pack Line sags on the three - the single most deadly weapon an inferior team has - and prevents penetration, which inferior teams can’t and weren’t gonna do anyway.

It IS the system!!

So when was it exactly when people didn't truly know the value of the 3? From what I recall, people have known the value of the 3 since the late 80s.
 

Ben101er

Heisman
Apr 21, 2004
25,720
60,519
103
Refs won’t let them lose again

You've got that right. That last call was absolutely horrible. The UVA player got a and one, when it was clearly an offensive foul. He not only hooked him with his elbow, he put his arm all the way down the GW players leg, holding him. Just shameful.
 

StubbornPenny

All-American
Nov 2, 2009
10,562
9,892
0
So when was it exactly when people didn't truly know the value of the 3? From what I recall, people have known the value of the 3 since the late 80s.

Are you intentionally being dense? Look at the rise of three point shots in college and in the pros. It is the single most valuable shot, and I don’t mean in terms of ITS WORTH THREE NOT TWO DURRRRRRR. I mean in terms of expected points per shot, you can play much more poorly in other aspects of the game, and a good night from three erased those deficiencies. With the way even poor teams can shoot it now, defending the three is more important than cutting off the driver. The pack line does the exactly opposite. Is it staring to sink in?