The KJ sideline turnover

[HalHR2500]

i believe it happened under 2 minutes but no review? TN player dove into his legs, no foul? Never saw a good replay

 

[Eddie Gran can coach]

Never saw a good replay either, but the official was just dying to call a turnover, I did surmise that.

 

[HalHR2500]

Shocked the monitor whores didn’t review that one, guess they didn’t want to, Cal should have demanded it, to slow momentum of game at that point in time

 

[willyclyde]

Did he flex after the turnover?

 

[tmuck]

Cal said on the postgame show, "They said they couldn't review it."

 

[Catzman]

I thought it was going to be a foul call the way they were foul happy on both teama at that time. Was shocked they just chalked it up to Johnson just choosing to step out of bounds.

 

[NoDef]

I thought it was going to be a foul call the way they were foul happy on both teama at that time. Was shocked they just chalked it up to Johnson just choosing to step out of bounds.

Yep. I thought the UT player rolled into the back of KJs legs . Didn't get a very good whistle late. Oh well.

 

[Chris Mallory]

Cal said on the postgame show, "They said they couldn't review it."

Cal just had to say he hooked him, then they would’ve had to go to the monitor.

 

[TomTraubertsBlues]

Cal said on the postgame show, "They said they couldn't review it."

Is that true? If it was under 2 they can, right?

 

[HalHR2500]

Oh they could have and should have reviewed the call

At that point in game, would have been a good time for Cal to call full timeout and reset

But he is wound so tight he tends to panic late and the game gets away from him and team

 

[efudexto]

i believe it happened under 2 minutes but no review? TN player dove into his legs, no foul? Never saw a good replay

Yeah, when that happened zi was celebrating the foul....didn't see a turnover coming out of that at all

 

[Blueaz]

I thought it was going to be a foul call the way they were foul happy on both teama at that time. Was shocked they just chalked it up to Johnson just choosing to step out of bounds.

My 11 year old said immediately "great, they called the foul on that guy diving at his legs"

and then Hagans was splatted by Bone at the end. His feet were still and bone had his head down and ran plowed into him...

 

[catswin]

The call apparently can’t be reviewed because the ball did not go out of bounds. In football on a fumble it can be reviewed to see if a player touched the ball while laying out of bounds. In college bball only review is to see which team last touches the ball before the ball goes out of bounds.

 

[TomTraubertsBlues]

The call apparently can’t be reviewed because the ball did not go out of bounds. In football on a fumble it can be reviewed to see if a player touched the ball while laying out of bounds. In college bball only review is to see which team last touches the ball before the ball goes out of bounds.

That's why I think they need to stop cherry picking what can and can't be reviewed. If you trust the refs, which of course we don't, but the NCAA is supposed to, then let them decide to go review something. They tell us the most important thing is to get the call right after all.

 

[turkeywildturkey]

Shocked the monitor whores didn’t review that one, guess they didn’t want to, Cal should have demanded it, to slow momentum of game at that point in time

That’s a non-reviewable call with over 2 minutes left. Cal knows that.

 

[HalHR2500]

Play happened at 145-150

It is reviewable because TN player could have easily been OOB and touching the ball

 

[Eddie Gran can coach]

Call happened under 2:00, damn right was it was reviewable, they chose not to