Can someone explain to me...

Kyfan37

Senior
Oct 5, 2007
2,391
535
0
If Tenn wins tomorrow, they could seriously be considered a possible 1 seed. And if that happens, UNC will NOT be a 1 seed.
 

Runnin'Ramel

Heisman
Jan 19, 2005
35,670
13,530
113
If Tenn wins tomorrow, they could seriously be considered a possible 1 seed. And if that happens, UNC will NOT be a 1 seed.
Um, if the Vols win tomorrow and aren't a 1 seed, the SEC will have gotten completely hosed by the Committee. Both UT and UK have 1 seed resumes in a typical year - I realize UK isn't getting one.
 

KatforLife56

Junior
Feb 4, 2019
350
389
0
Um, if the Vols win tomorrow and aren't a 1 seed, the SEC will have gotten completely hosed by the Committee. Both UT and UK have 1 seed resumes in a typical year - I realize UK isn't getting one.
Exactly...That will be unreal to me if no sec team gets a 1 seed. What a disgrace that will be....The four one seeds should be Ky, UT, Duke, UVa.
 

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
If Tenn wins tomorrow, they could seriously be considered a possible 1 seed. And if that happens, UNC will NOT be a 1 seed.
The committee doesn’t factor in Sunday from what they’ve said, either Tennessee already has a one or they don’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orionorl

Orionorl

Senior
Apr 2, 2006
908
570
0
If Tenn wins tomorrow, they could seriously be considered a possible 1 seed. And if that happens, UNC will NOT be a 1 seed.

No, they cannot. The Committee has already chosen UNC as a 1. They announced there was only has ONE 1 seed to fill on Friday. Gonzo was selected for that seed after we lost today. Only our hearts has us as a one, and the committee did NOT want to give us Louisville under ANY circumstance. Looks like we start in Jacksonville with Tennessee and Cincinnati fans watching our games and cheering whoever we play...of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randy Bob

Ugoff

Heisman
May 7, 2009
16,403
21,489
0
Because they beat Duke twice.

But wait, Duke wasn't punished for those losses because they were without Zion.

Yet UNC gets the benefit of those wins even though Zion didn't play.

Yeah.
Yep, the ESPN honks talk out both side of their mouths and use whatever twisted logic they see fit to justify pimping an ACC team. I'm also starting to suspect that Lunardi's job is less about predicting and more about pushing whatever the NCAA is planning to do regarding matchups and seeding.
 

Wildcats1st

Heisman
Sep 16, 2017
18,949
28,911
0
why Lunardi has UNC comfortably as a 1 seed, and us as a 2 seed? We basically have the same record and we beat them on a neutral floor. I don't understand.

Do you think unc jumps ut in net after beating uk?? There’s your answer and espn knows it so they want maximum pressure
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
We have the same record as UNC.

We beat them head to head.

We have more Quad 1 wins.

They beat Duke without Williamson. We both lost to full strength Duke.

How can they be above us in seeding? Makes no sense.

UT better get the last 1 seed and we should be the top 2 seed.

Won't happen, because the Selection Committee is corrupt.

And don't tell me that Mitch is on the committee, he has no say on UK. He has to leave the room when they are being discussed.

Mark it down, we are in DC with Duke.
 

ULISwuzPointGod

All-Conference
Feb 15, 2018
965
1,334
0
We have the same record as UNC.

We beat them head to head.

We have more Quad 1 wins.

They beat Duke without Williamson. We both lost to full strength Duke.

How can they be above us in seeding? Makes no sense.

UT better get the last 1 seed and we should be the top 2 seed.

Won't happen, because the Selection Committee is corrupt.

And don't tell me that Mitch is on the committee, he has no say on UK. He has to leave the room when they are being discussed.
I said this b4 but I’ll say it again....Duke is GOD, UNC is Jesus and the ACC is heaven...we r all just tryna get in after them lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runt#1969

KatforLife56

Junior
Feb 4, 2019
350
389
0
We have the same record as UNC.

We beat them head to head.

We have more Quad 1 wins.

They beat Duke without Williamson. We both lost to full strength Duke.

How can they be above us in seeding? Makes no sense.

UT better get the last 1 seed and we should be the top 2 seed.

Won't happen, because the Selection Committee is corrupt.

And don't tell me that Mitch is on the committee, he has no say on UK. He has to leave the room when they are being discussed.

Mark it down, we are in DC with Duke.
This is a great post and is 100 percent truth. In every criteria one can come up with we should be placed above UNC. I hope dumb Joe is wrong, but sometimes I wonder if the selection committee even follows college basketball....They probably just have Joe call them on a special line and inform them of the worthy teams and the unworthy ones.
 

TheDude73

Heisman
Jan 7, 2006
24,303
24,061
113
If Tenn wins tomorrow, they could seriously be considered a possible 1 seed. And if that happens, UNC will NOT be a 1 seed.
Seeding for top lines is done. Sunday means nothing. They know who their top 4 seeds and regions they'll be in already.
 

Randy Bob

All-Conference
Jun 14, 2009
7,293
4,050
113
I am not surprised UNC gets a No. 1 seed them and Duke are in the click every yr nothing new.
 
KSR

Latest

  1. 01 KSR Craig Skinner wore a picture of himself at Media Day to help promote Kentucky volleyball
  2. 02 KSR Kentucky's history with the biggest names in the proposed 5-for-5 portal
  3. 03 KSR Mark Pope and his staff went to Wheeler's Pharmacy today
  4. 04 KSR Kentucky VB to play 11 national TV matches, including first-of-its-kind showdown vs. Louisville
  5. 05 KSR Of course Zakai Zeigler filed another lawsuit vs. the NCAA