I had a cold this weekend so I took some time to watch the SEC championship game last year. While doing so, I compared the players on the court with recent Tennessee box scores, and with what I remember of seeing them play in the past few weeks.
As near as I could tell, their minute distribution is very similar to last year. And the couple times I watched them, they looked to run the same defense and try to score the same ways.
So, what has anyone else seen that makes this a better team than last year - aside from more experience (by the end of last year most of these guys had already played together two full seasons, so they were pretty cohesive last March.)
What are they doing better than the team that lost to Kentucky in the SEC tournament, then lost to 11-seed Loyola in the Round of 32?
(By the way, it was revealing how much of Cal's game plan in that SEC tournament final Bryce Drew used in that game where Vandy had UT beat. Obviously, he didn't have a Shai Gilgeous-Alexander but they got lots of the same shots.)
As near as I could tell, their minute distribution is very similar to last year. And the couple times I watched them, they looked to run the same defense and try to score the same ways.
So, what has anyone else seen that makes this a better team than last year - aside from more experience (by the end of last year most of these guys had already played together two full seasons, so they were pretty cohesive last March.)
What are they doing better than the team that lost to Kentucky in the SEC tournament, then lost to 11-seed Loyola in the Round of 32?
(By the way, it was revealing how much of Cal's game plan in that SEC tournament final Bryce Drew used in that game where Vandy had UT beat. Obviously, he didn't have a Shai Gilgeous-Alexander but they got lots of the same shots.)