Carey announcing Thursday

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,869
34,325
113
Carey's coming to UK. this is more dark horse than Knox considering we're not even in the top 3. write it down its happening.....


really though......... why care at this point?
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,285
98,886
113
It's going to be awesome the next few years watching everyone write how UK's not getting guys because we don't cheat.

That's great. It doesn't solve the problem, but it's a wonderful foundation to creating a complete culture of losers.
 

keefsopeng

All-Conference
Mar 23, 2005
5,015
2,068
0
Other teams are negatively recruiting against our style/coaching and rightly so. If I was recruiting against Cal I'd certainly be spinning the he can't coach, doesn't know how to use players skill's correctly, and runs no offense argument. All of those things have merit and can be proven on tape. If Cal doesn't start changing he's done winning titles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyFaninNC

SDcatfan13

All-Conference
Sep 26, 2003
50,328
4,190
113
Other teams are negatively recruiting against our style/coaching and rightly so. If I was recruiting against Cal I'd certainly be spinning the he can't coach, doesn't know how to use players skill's correctly, and runs no offense argument. All of those things have merit and can be proven on tape. If Cal doesn't start changing he's done winning titles.
Not like Izzo's style is an exciting offense. Also, last time I checked, Duke hasn't made a Final 4 the past 3 years either with all the freshmen talent they've had. Can easily point out coaching flaws in those teams too.
 

keefsopeng

All-Conference
Mar 23, 2005
5,015
2,068
0
Not like Izzo's style is an exciting offense. Also, last time I checked, Duke hasn't made a Final 4 the past 3 years either with all the freshmen talent they've had. Can easily point out coaching flaws in those teams too.
Izzo has never gotten elite talent and doesn't try to present himself as NBA University like Kentucky/Cal does. K doesn't have anything to prove to anyone he's universally lauded as the greatest college basketball coach of all time whether you agree with that or not. My point more is less is that if we plan on continuing the selling focus being NBA U we better start to play a style that looks anything like NBA basketball
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
Other teams are negatively recruiting against our style/coaching and rightly so. If I was recruiting against Cal I'd certainly be spinning the he can't coach, doesn't know how to use players skill's correctly, and runs no offense argument. All of those things have merit and can be proven on tape. If Cal doesn't start changing he's done winning titles.
BINGO. It is not about other schools cheating.
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
I must quasi apologize. I kept thinking of you when they outed that uncfaninky dude yesterday or the day before. It still makes me think of you but I know better now. [laughing]
Thanks, I have thought about changing my name because that idiot's name was so close to mine, and others have got us mixed up before, but I did not want to lose my post count. So here i be.
 

BBUK_anon

Hall of Famer
May 26, 2005
52,358
124,843
0
It's going to be awesome the next few years watching everyone write how UK's not getting guys because we don't cheat.

That's great. It doesn't solve the problem, but it's a wonderful foundation to creating a complete culture of losers.

Yeah, some will use it as a crutch...
 

Macys Socks

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2009
4,448
2,528
113
I'm gonna throw out my theory, maybe it'll stick. Cal has a vengeance plan for Duke after the way Zion played UK. He will commit to the Cats today out of the blue when many had him penciled in as a Dukie. It's been Cal's plan this whole time. Carey will reach down under the table and pull out a UK hat.

I have no sources but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.
 

Elliott Tim

All-American
Dec 10, 2005
10,122
6,290
0
Probably going to UNC or Duke.

Oh well. We didn’t really want him.

He’s overrated.

His Mom sews socks that smell.
Your tongue-in-cheek humour sure beats " we lost another recruit" that was never ours in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevcat

RoyKent

Heisman
Feb 3, 2015
22,957
33,035
66
K likely gets another top 5 guy:

Top 5 players destinations since 2015 (from 247 composite rankings):

Duke - 8
Kansas - 2
UK - 1 (Skal)
UCLA - 1
Washington - 1
Mizzou - 1
Texas - 1
Arizona - 1
Alabama - 1
Oregon - 1
UNC - 1
LSU - 1
Cal - 1
Memphis - 1
 

BBUK_anon

Hall of Famer
May 26, 2005
52,358
124,843
0
K likely gets another top 5 guy:

Top 5 players destinations since 2015 (from 247 composite rankings):

Duke - 8
Kansas - 2
UK - 1 (Skal)
UCLA - 1
Washington - 1
Mizzou - 1
Texas - 1
Arizona - 1
Alabama - 1
Oregon - 1
UNC - 1
LSU - 1
Cal - 1
Memphis - 1

K can always use more fans though...
 

KyFaninNC

Heisman
Mar 14, 2005
195,719
24,518
0
K likely gets another top 5 guy:

Top 5 players destinations since 2015 (from 247 composite rankings):

Duke - 8
Kansas - 2
UK - 1 (Skal)
UCLA - 1
Washington - 1
Mizzou - 1
Texas - 1
Arizona - 1
Alabama - 1
Oregon - 1
UNC - 1
LSU - 1
Cal - 1
Memphis - 1
That choke job Cal put on against Wisky hurt him badly, I have felt that ever since.
 

W_Heisenberg

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2013
2,435
1,075
0
K likely gets another top 5 guy:

Top 5 players destinations since 2015 (from 247 composite rankings):

Duke - 8
Kansas - 2
UK - 1 (Skal)
UCLA - 1
Washington - 1
Mizzou - 1
Texas - 1
Arizona - 1
Alabama - 1
Oregon - 1
UNC - 1
LSU - 1
Cal - 1
Memphis - 1

Interesting that UK and Duke have been to the same number of Final Fours since then....wonder who does less with more...
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf and GonzoCat90

Jakarii

All-Conference
Jan 29, 2016
4,640
3,048
0
Kids are now looking at NBA bigs and seeing all the different places they have gone yet still succeeding. I don’t think Nick Richards has helped things either


It blows my mind with ALL the success Cal has had with his position. Just dumb if he doesn't pick UK. No sane reason but it's his life...
 

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
45,571
82,592
113
Thanks, I have thought about changing my name because that idiot's name was so close to mine, and others have got us mixed up before, but I did not want to lose my post count. So here i be.

I think that when I glance across it as well. Sucks but don’t change just for that loser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBUK_anon

Mime-Is-Money

All-Conference
May 29, 2002
8,607
2,252
113
K likely gets another top 5 guy:

Top 5 players destinations since 2015 (from 247 composite rankings):

Duke - 8
Kansas - 2
UK - 1 (Skal)
UCLA - 1
Washington - 1
Mizzou - 1
Texas - 1
Arizona - 1
Alabama - 1
Oregon - 1
UNC - 1
LSU - 1
Cal - 1
Memphis - 1

That's just absurd. Good news is it can only go one direction from here for Dukes recruiting
 
Last edited:

Wall2Boogie

Heisman
Jan 28, 2010
26,239
21,732
0
I remember the days when we would get excited about players decisions that were in the top 5.

Fffaaaarrr ccccaaaalllll!!!!!!

Get rid of barnfart
 

BBUK_anon

Hall of Famer
May 26, 2005
52,358
124,843
0
Kids are now looking at NBA bigs and seeing all the different places they have gone yet still succeeding. I don’t think Nick Richards has helped things either

I don't think Nick matters one way or the other. Cal has too many to point to that will also give Cal the credit....
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevcat and awf

Wall2Boogie

Heisman
Jan 28, 2010
26,239
21,732
0
Obviously cal has changed something with his recruiting pitch. It also doesn’t help having less than mediocre recruiters. We need a guy like coach o back. Barbee needs to go and Justus isn’t of much use either. The payne train is good along with robic because his hair comes close to matching cals. I think cal is taking the first commits rather than playing it out. No offense to guys like Richards but they are ready and willing to commit on the spot it kind of sends away the top 5 guys that could take his spot. I do enjoy that he’s getting guys that can shoot the ball atleast they have shown they can. Cal will get it back on track we just need to get someone in there that can sell these kids cause the staff now is not getting it done. This year on paper we all thought a2015 type season. We could still make a deep run, but some things gotta change.
 
Jan 29, 2003
18,120
12,185
0
Other teams are negatively recruiting against our style/coaching and rightly so. If I was recruiting against Cal I'd certainly be spinning the he can't coach, doesn't know how to use players skill's correctly, and runs no offense argument. All of those things have merit and can be proven on tape. If Cal doesn't start changing he's done winning titles.
Since he's been at Kentucky:

first in wins
first in winning percentage
first in NCAA tournament wins
most final fours
first ballot hall of famer

but "he can't coach, doesn't know how to use players skill's correctly (sic), and runs no offense."

Moronic take.
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,285
98,886
113
Why 2015?

Maybe because it corresponds with the end of the run that sent UK to 4 Final Fours in 5 years - those 5 years each featuring an elite player and the only year without a Final Four during that run was when one of the elite players tore his ACL?

Do we need a 20 year sample size before we acknowledge how this thing works best under Calipari? Cal's the best OAD coach in the land. He went to 5 Final Fours from '08 to '15. Each of those Final Fours featured an elite freshman. It's not really a stretch to lay a claim to Cal's system working best when he has elite freshmen.

Can he do it with multiple guys in the 6-15 range? Yes. Right now, we have two locked up for next year. Gonna need a third guy like McDaniels or Hurt.
 

Son_Of_Saul

Heisman
Dec 7, 2007
45,285
98,886
113
Interesting that UK and Duke have been to the same number of Final Fours since then....wonder who does less with more...

No doubt Cal is superior OAD coach. Which is the point many of us are making. We want to start landing those guys again. Comparing him to K is fun, but it can also serve as deflection. It really comes down to what works best for Cal.
 

GonzoCat90

Heisman
Mar 30, 2009
32,377
34,559
0
Maybe because it corresponds with the end of the run that sent UK to 4 Final Fours in 5 years - those 5 years each featuring an elite player and the only year without a Final Four during that run was when one of the elite players tore his ACL?

Do we need a 20 year sample size before we acknowledge how this thing works best under Calipari? Cal's the best OAD coach in the land. He went to 5 Final Fours from '08 to '15. Each of those Final Fours featured an elite freshman. It's not really a stretch to lay a claim to Cal's system working best when he has elite freshmen.

Can he do it with multiple guys in the 6-15 range? Yes. Right now, we have two locked up for next year. Gonna need a third guy like McDaniels or Hurt.

But it doesn't correspond to anything. We were a shot away from the Final Four in 17 and I think we're one of a handful of teams with a chance this year. If you mean that the Skal team wasn't very good and last year's team lost a game they shouldn't have in the tournament, sure.

But this game is too macro to use individual seasons as indicators of anything, and it's just as dumb to use a three year sample as it is to arbitrarily cut off the rankings at top 5. It's like when Louisville fans used to argue that they had as many titles as we did since 1980. It's cherrypicked nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: awf

RoyKent

Heisman
Feb 3, 2015
22,957
33,035
66
But it doesn't correspond to anything. We were a shot away from the Final Four in 17 and I think we're one of a handful of teams with a chance this year. If you mean that the Skal team wasn't very good and last year's team lost a game they shouldn't have in the tournament, sure.

But this game is too macro to use individual seasons as indicators of anything, and it's just as dumb to use a three year sample as it is to arbitrarily cut off the rankings at top 5. It's like when Louisville fans used to argue that they had as many titles as we did since 1980. It's cherrypicked nonsense.

You don't think a 5 year sample size is sufficient? Keep your head buried in the sand if you want but starting in 2015 is when (according to everyone- fans, media, etc...) when Cal started losing top guys and struggled to land the top tier talent he was bringing in previously.

Maybe top 5 shouldn't be the cutoff, I'm not sure. But, if you don't agree that Cal has missed on a crazy amount of top guys and hasn't landed the best of the best (which he himself said is what he does at UK) than I am not sure what to tell you.

5 years is more than plenty to form an opinion on.
 

Joneslab

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2005
4,219
1,478
0
I think Whitney is a top five type sort of player, maybe even top three. I sort of think Matthew Hurt is a top five player as well.

Some classes have ten or twelve players who can step in and contribute at an all-conference level immediately. Others, like last year, have maybe just five or six total. This current class is strong and that's good for Kentucky, because it means we still have a chance to get top five talent without getting actual top five rated guys (though Whitney might be in there before it's all said and done, and of course there's McDaniels in there).

So the ranking isn't the most worrying thing. The most worrying thing is that Cal has coveted guys the last two or three years he's missed on. In Cal's defense, two of those guys--Young and Wiseman--ended up at their hometown schools. And when Cal has moved off of those top guys he's wanted more than anybody, it's been too late.

You've got to get your main target at a place like Kentucky. And that will still be true after Cal leaves here.
 

Ben101er

Heisman
Apr 21, 2004
25,607
60,235
103
That choke job Cal put on against Wisky hurt him badly, I have felt that ever since.

Your Cal negativity knows no bounds. No way that game was Cal's fault. Officiating was the cause of the outcome of that game, plain and simple. There is no argument for this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wall2Boogie