Most likely not may have to sit out the rest of the season what do you think
Absolutely do not dig into anyWell if this is true, lets not follow the example set by some "other fans" of their schools.
Lets dig into it, get to the bottom of it, deal with it, accept whatever punishment goes along with it, and move on!
If this stuff runs as deep as they're saying, it'll probably lead to rule changes instead of penalties, because there's no way that the NCAA will allow college basketball to be destroyed.
Absolutely do not dig into anything. Deny, deny, and deny again! You must not remember 1989. I remember listening on the radio when the NCAA announced the sanctions against us. The first few minutes all they did was praise UK for all of their work. Said it was the most thorough job that they had seen, and that the NCAA had to do very little. I remember after hearing those comments thinking the penalties would not be too bad, and then they absolutely hammered us. So always deny, deny, and deny again!!Well if this is true, lets not follow the example set by some "other fans" of their schools.
Lets dig into it, get to the bottom of it, deal with it, accept whatever punishment goes along with it, and move on!
If this stuff runs as deep as they're saying, it'll probably lead to rule changes instead of penalties, because there's no way that the NCAA will allow college basketball to be destroyed.
Do you mean one where this kind of cheating is OK?I wish that, somehow, this could lead to the big power conferences to tell the NCAA to take a hike and form their own governing body.
I wouldn't say UNC and Duke are in the clear. Tony Bradley's name has been mentioned.
The issue is whether the NCAA can act on information in sealed indictments.
Or is it a possibility Bam nor his family received any money and this is just a BS tax write off this company uses for players that don't sign with them?? I tend to think not, but who knows in this shady business.Pat Forde is unlikely to defame Bam and Kevin to get to Cal. The fact that Bam did not sign with Miller probably is support for the assumption that Cal did not know.
It may also suggest Bam did not receive the money, but maybe his family did.
Meh.
As long as no on at UK was arranging the payments like Louisville staffers then we will be fine. Forfeit some wins and may get some type of probation. UNC** and Duke being in the boat with us makes it a little easier to take.
I just don't see how anyone could monitor outside 3rd parties on issues like this. The NCAA needs an enema.
Also, this thing may drag out for a looooong time. Louisville hasn't even been hit with their notice of infractions yet.
If this is all there is then I would be happy at this juncture.
No, of course not; how did extrapolate that from what I said?Do you mean one where this kind of cheating is OK?
wow 29 whole posts
If you believe the document. If you think the document is just scratching the surface, you sit him.
It’s ok to meet with agents, yes. It’s not ok to have them pay for mealsKnox is fine. It is ok to meet with agents prior to eligibility being gone. It is not ok to sign with an agent.
If you believe UK did nothing wrong, you play him.
Well, Bam (if true), is by far the worst case scenario.It may have ultimately been a blessing that Higgins F'ed us over, we get to wipe most of an NIT season off the books and Knox owes money for some chicken fingers.
That looks like the worst case scenario here so far.
No. That was the Memphis approach.
If you believe UK did nothing wrong, you play him.
But, depending on the restaurant and cost of meal, a fairly minor infraction I imagine.It’s ok to meet with agents, yes. It’s not ok to have them pay for meals
Us winning the national title last year would have made this far worse than our current worst case scenario. The rooferee may have saved us from being in the same boat with Team Stripper.Well, Bam (if true), is by far the worst case scenario.
You have to believe UK AND Knox did nothing wrong. If Knox took something that UK doesn’t know anything about he is still an ineligible player. Will not surprise me if we sit him until NCAA or UK compliance office reviews and “clears” himIf you believe UK did nothing wrong, you play him.
But this gets back to the question of regular season vs. postseason eligibility.
Would we keep postseason wins this year if they said "you only got those because you played an ineligible player during the regular season?"
I feel like there's no additional risk to playing him the rest of the way. Only potential reward if we win and end up going unpunished.