Next year's team is shaping up very nicely. We will have a few key returnees from this team as well. Gabriel (huge potential), Killeya-Jones (huge potential), Humphries, possibly Briscoe, Wynyard.
Some of you are amazing. Cal just landed a fantastic prospect, giving us the current best class, again... and your very first reaction is finding some negatives in it. What a spoiled bunch we are. When Cal is gone, you folks will be the ones calling for a new coach every year.
Looks more like Southern Illini.Could someone please crop or photshop the big ugly red bird out of this picture?
Nah, i just like being able to hit outside shots.I swear you're really starting to sound like UMM. You must be a very unhappy person.
Nah, i just like being able to hit outside shots.
All these posters who are making fun of the "we need shooters" crowd who always bring up Cal's Final 4 appearances as a reason to worship him....do you realize how many final 4's he would have won had he actually had 3 point shooters? The only team that had 3 point shooters was the freshman combo of knight and lamb. Laugh all u want and throw them final 4 appearances out there...but had he had 3 ball shooters (meaning more than one at a time) he would have at the very minimum 3 championships here!
Some of you are amazing. Cal just landed a fantastic prospect, giving us the current best class, again... and your very first reaction is finding some negatives in it. What a spoiled bunch we are. When Cal is gone, you folks will be the ones calling for a new coach every year.
So I assume JV is a bricklayer?I just dont get it. Don't care who gets mad....CAL, SIGN SOME DAMN SHOOTERS!!!!!
Nah, i just like being able to hit outside shots.
LOL , of course I'm not rated to him , but Vanderbilt is a worse version of two players we already have for next year. At this point our best offensive play will be an offensive rebound. Teams will be able to play 5 guys in the paint , pretty hard to drive on that defense. If we sign Young everything changes . If we sign Diallio it gets worse . We got the no.1 class in the country but the pieces don't fit .
I guess next season we are going to play 4 bigs/forwards (with 4 more backing them up) and a PG.
Making baskets is the point of the game....dunks and layups are a small percentage of a game...therefore being able to shoot from outside gives you a more dominant edgeShooters are nice but basketball players are the key to winning.
Looks more like Southern Illini.
UK had shooters last year. We didn't do chit in the tournament.Nah, i just like being able to hit outside shots.
Knox has been a pUKe lean for a while.God I hope this doesn't hurt us with Knox .
Wife mad again cause your a lazy bastard ....shooters!Got a club foot....shooters!
Teeny weeny........shooters!
In debt.................shooters!
Can't rebound......shooters!
Poor rural cell coverage...shooters!
Porn site buffering....shooters!
Booker Harrison and Willis couldnt shoot??
Interesting take since the two Harrison years UK went to the final four twice and the final game once. How many final fours has Gonzaga been to? How about ZERO.s
Booker, I'll give you. But the Harrisons were only 35 percent outside shooters, and Willis is currently only shooting 34 percent and averages only 1 made three per game. I don't think that's quite the caliber of shooter folks are talking about in this thread.
There is some legitimacy to the gripe about Cal not recruiting enough shooters. In his entire time here, he's only had about three or four recruits (Lamb, Booker, Murray and maybe Wiltjer) that I would categorize as elite outside shooters. Part of the problem is the prospects who are the purest shooters so often just don't fit Cal's system defensively and athletically--and as we saw with Wiltjer, trying to jam that square peg into a round hole doesn't work so well.
Interesting take since the two Harrison years UK went to the final four twice and the final game once. How many final fours has Gonzaga been to? How about ZERO.
You mentioned Wiltjer. And Gonzaga is an example of a team of shooters. They don't anything in March. And I don't wear panties.So? I wasn't trying to defend Gonzaga, and did not suggest their way was in any way better than ours (it is not). In fact, I never even mentioned them. Not sure why you're getting your panties all in a bunch.
You mentioned Wiltjer. And Gonzaga is an example of a team of shooters. They don't anything in March. And I don't wear panties.
I am a charter member of the "we need shooters" school BUTLOL , of course I'm not rated to him , but Vanderbilt is a worse version of two players we already have for next year. At this point our best offensive play will be an offensive rebound. Teams will be able to play 5 guys in the paint , pretty hard to drive on that defense. If we sign Young everything changes . If we sign Diallio it gets worse . We got the no.1 class in the country but the pieces don't fit .
Are you referring to Rodney McCray pictured at the far right in the front row?Could someone please crop or photshop the big ugly red bird out of this picture?
Don't disagree but still . . . get some damn shooters CalYou're right, you don't get it. Recruiting ain't over yet for one thing, and for another, is it not possible for players to improve. Sheesh. UK has gotten the #1 class and folks ain't happy. Ever wonder why this job at UK ages coaches so much. This is part of it.
finish the class up with Bamba and a couple guards that can shoot and UK will be right there again next season. One thing is for sure... every single guy UK has committed/signed right now all have defense listed as a strength.
Bamba is the best rim protector in high school. Richards is another one of the best. Vanderbilt was known as a good defender, Alexander the same, Green led the EYBL in steals, Washington was known for his defense. All of Vanderbilt, Richards, Bamba, and Washington averaged double figure rebounds in EYBL this past summer.
May see a lot of 75-55 games next season.
All these posters who are making fun of the "we need shooters" crowd who always bring up Cal's Final 4 appearances as a reason to worship him....do you realize how many final 4's he would have won had he actually had 3 point shooters? The only team that had 3 point shooters was the freshman combo of knight and lamb. Laugh all u want and throw them final 4 appearances out there...but had he had 3 ball shooters (meaning more than one at a time) he would have at the very minimum 3 championships here!
that's been thrown around. Maybe not quite the prolific shot blocker of someone like Noel, but who is? Noel and Davis are the two best shot blockers in UK history and Noel was on pace to break Davis' blocks in a season number when he went down (though that team wouldn't have ever played the 40 games needed).
He's tall, lanky, runs the floor, grabs rebounds outside his space, has a decent touch out to 15 feet or so but he'll be a guy UK uses to drop step and baby hook, offensive put back his way to double digit scoring. Dude's 6'11" with a 7'8" wing span and like a 9'5" reach... that's better than anyone currently in the NBA.
All these posters who are making fun of the "we need shooters" crowd who always bring up Cal's Final 4 appearances as a reason to worship him....do you realize how many final 4's he would have won had he actually had 3 point shooters? The only team that had 3 point shooters was the freshman combo of knight and lamb. Laugh all u want and throw them final 4 appearances out there...but had he had 3 ball shooters (meaning more than one at a time) he would have at the very minimum 3 championships here!