**********OFFICIAL GAME THREAD*********

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,171
0
Great, but this ain't march. It's f'ing December dude. How can you expect this team to play march style ball in December? Even veteran teams aren't doing that. Get real.

People say we have issues right now in certain settings. We are limited in what we can do on the offensive end.

People respond by saying we just went 7-7 against Hofstra in the start of the second half. There's no problems with skilled players.

People respond by saying against solid competition factors etc.

Tons of miscommunication and hyperbole going around.
 

Bkocats

Heisman
Jan 2, 2011
80,845
69,725
67
that was a pretty crappy call
and oh look - near the spread. Coincidence?
 

katwest

Heisman
Feb 16, 2003
39,852
13,717
113
Their guards have been carrying the ball a lot and no call, are the refs just letting it go because of the score or what.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
50,522
70,720
113
Wrong guys shooting threes. Where has Willis been in the second half?
Cal has been reading our happy little thread here. So many have said to bench Willis because he missed a rebound. So, there you go, he's on the bench, because apparently he "sucks". That is the word of the day here today.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: John Henry

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
really...all i heard all week was how terrible we are at several parts of the game.

Yeah not sure what the other poster is insinuating. UK is gonna hit the 3's or not hit the 3's. The opponent can't stop us from making them or missing them, no matter the opponent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ukfan041

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,171
0
I never said that. It still doesn't change the narrative that we aren't a good shooting team. If we shoot like this against UnC and UL that may change.

There are 3 or 4 "nothing is ever wrong" know-it-all posters that use ad hominem attacks and hyperbole / misrepresent all arguments to make themselves feel better and seem smarter. Just ignore'em. Same posters That cite "its all luck in the end" when you turn out right and they face plant.

They aren't worth communicating with.
 

NCukcat62

All-Conference
Jul 22, 2007
8,893
3,671
0
NBA draft predictions have nothing to do with how good they'll be in college. The NBA does not care one bit if you can play basketball very well. They care that you fit the part (tall, athletic, long arms), and anything else is just bonus. NBA draft rankings SHOULD NOT be indicative of how a player will be in college. Why can people not figure this out after a decade and a half of the NBA drafting this way?!??!
I agree with you. I just wanted to be non politically correct.
 

anon1763419335

All-American
Feb 10, 2006
23,231
5,077
113
humphries with a sweat 6 foot jump hook that goes wide right by a mile. but yeah...he needs to play more
 

NCukcat62

All-Conference
Jul 22, 2007
8,893
3,671
0
So they should be judged by what they do and don't know at 18 years old instead of their NBA potential? Got it.
Tell you what, please don't apply for any jobs in the NCAA or NBA scouting offices. Because if there's anyone that sucks, it's you. Using the phrase "they suck at… " is just wrong. How about being a little more respectful of our team?
How is it wrong? Alright I'll be a little more politically correct for you, they aren't good at rebounding and they have room for improvement. Better?
 
Feb 14, 2007
14,660
22,283
113
There are 3 or 4 "nothing is ever wrong" know-it-all posters that use ad hominem attacks and hyperbole / misrepresent all arguments to make themselves feel better and seem smarter. Just ignore'em. Same posters That cite "its all luck in the end" when you turn out right and they face plant.

They aren't worth communicating with.
Damn right