Seriously, how can anyone support this?

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
6,062
9,331
113
Bottom line on this: these illegals are receiving administrative due process that our laws require full stop. Libs are attempting to make judicial due process a moral obligation and moral issue when it’s irrelevant. Our laws are being followed. Period.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
6,062
9,331
113
K, “bff”

Why I stopped out back and forth.
There should be acknowledgment and acceptance of responsibility as to why this is such a huge problem. I don’t think that’s too much to ask. I’m sick of you guys acting like these are saints that fell out of the sky one day. The Democrats were actively incentivizing law breaking full stop man. I’m not trying to be an ******* but it’s frustrating to try and reason with you. Not only did that party stop punishing the law breaking, they made it easier and encouraged it, how can you align with that. It’s disgusting.
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,186
21,593
113
There should be acknowledgment and acceptance of responsibility as to why this is such a huge problem. I don’t think that’s too much to ask. I’m sick of you guys acting like these are saints that fell out of the sky one day. The Democrats were actively incentivizing law breaking full stop man. I’m not trying to be an ******* but it’s frustrating to try and reason with you. Not only did that party stop punishing the law breaking, they made it easier and encouraged it, how can you align with that. It’s disgusting.
The reason I had stopped responding is that you aren’t arguing with the words people are actually saying. You’re arguing against caricatures of the opposition as you see it in your mind. At no point have you read me say Biden did a good job on the border (or really in general tbh). Can you point me to where anyone has said these guys are saints? That’s the **** I’m talking about. No one is saying that. You’re making things up and then arguing against them as if that position is ridiculous (it’s bc it is. It was just made up, by you).

Have a good weekend MT
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
6,062
9,331
113
The reason I had stopped responding is that you aren’t arguing with the words people are actually saying. You’re arguing against caricatures of the opposition as you see it in your mind. At no point have you read me say Biden did a good job on the border (or really in general tbh). Can you point me to where anyone has said these guys are saints? That’s the **** I’m talking about. No one is saying that. You’re making things up and then arguing against them as if that position is ridiculous (it’s bc it is. It was just made up, by you).

Have a good weekend MT
I also don’t see any remorse or sympathy from the folks on the left that caused this. Disappointed in the party of tolerance. The fact you’re arguing for a specific due process is another problem. They got the due process entitled to them. You know that. So you are misleading too!
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
25,554
24,391
113
K, “bff”

Why I stopped out back and forth.
You play the Muhammad Ali rope a dope.

You are just trying to slow the Trump admin.

You are for deportation but not for deportation.

You don’t like the things democrats do, allow unfettered illegal immigration, but you keep supporting them.

The rest of the country has caught on to their antics. Delay, distract, resist.

Typical of democrats. They have no new ideas. They have no leadership. All they can do is resist Trump. And that is exactly what huckleberry is doing.

We see right through the democratic hypocrisy and it’s why the are polling sub 20%
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,255
26,991
113
There should be acknowledgment and acceptance of responsibility as to why this is such a huge problem. I don’t think that’s too much to ask. I’m sick of you guys acting like these are saints that fell out of the sky one day. The Democrats were actively incentivizing law breaking full stop man. I’m not trying to be an ******* but it’s frustrating to try and reason with you. Not only did that party stop punishing the law breaking, they made it easier and encouraged it, how can you align with that. It’s disgusting.
He's right in that you're arguing over a scenario you invented but it's actually a fallacious argument that doesn't hold water.

The majority of Democrats voted for Biden because they thought he would beat Trump, not because he was amaze balls or to condone everything he did. So let's just get this out of the way, Biden did a horrible job managing the border and I don't know anyone who approved of it. He royally screwed up so we get your point.

But now that they're here, all we're asking is that you make sure they are who you say they are before you whisk them away to a foreign gulag. We already know of a case where they deported a gay make-up artist to El Salvador because they mistook his tattoos that honored his parents for gang tattoos. He was seeking asylum and followed legal procedures to request refuge but now he's in a foreign death-camp and Trump refuses to return him. There are a couple other cases just like his and if you think that's ok, well that's what I call disgusting.

Is that really so hard to understand? You can't just assume someone is here illegally because of tattoos or suspicion and ship them to a foreign prison just because you're mad that Biden let them through. We get that you're mad, we understand that Biden screwed up but you should also try to understand that's not a good enough reason to disappear anyone you suspect without proving they qualify.

That's all we're arguing so to say that we approve of harboring murderers or we think they're saints is just false made up nonsense, but you keep belaboring a point we aren't making. This isn't hard.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,841
35,869
113
He's right in that you're arguing over a scenario you invented but it's actually a fallacious argument that doesn't hold water.

The majority of Democrats voted for Biden because they thought he would beat Trump, not because he was amaze balls or to condone everything he did. So let's just get this out of the way, Biden did a horrible job managing the border and I don't know anyone who approved of it. He royally screwed up so we get your point.

But now that they're here, all we're asking is that you make sure they are who you say they are before you whisk them away to a foreign gulag. We already know of a case where they deported a gay make-up artist to El Salvador because they mistook his tattoos that honored his parents for gang tattoos. He was seeking asylum and followed legal procedures to request refuge but now he's in a foreign death-camp and Trump refuses to return him. There are a couple other cases just like his and if you think that's ok, well that's what I call disgusting.

Is that really so hard to understand? You can't just assume someone is here illegally because of tattoos or suspicion and ship them to a foreign prison just because you're mad that Biden let them through. We get that you're mad, we understand that Biden screwed up but you should also try to understand that's not a good enough reason to disappear anyone you suspect without proving they qualify.

That's all we're arguing so to say that we approve of harboring murderers or we think they're saints is just false made up nonsense, but you keep belaboring a point we aren't making. This isn't hard.
The dem party and all supporters collectively own the disaster otherwise known as the Biden occupation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
11,743
12,997
113
Due process is literally the process where you determine they are an illegal alien that was mass imported.

This feels like us right now:

Me: Say it with me
Me: Deport people
You: Deport people
Me: After going through
You: after going through
Me: the legal process to do so
You: the legal process to do so
Me: deport people after going through the legal process to do so
You: you want to keep mass murders and gang bangers and believe there’s nothing that could be done, open borders and never deporting anyone
This is stupid though. You want to do this for 40 million people?

Yeah, if you think there are only 10-15 million of illegals (that's just the number JOE let in) here then you are the stupid one.

Illegals have been coming across since our country was founded.
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,186
21,593
113
This is stupid though. You want to do this for 40 million people?

Yeah, if you think there are only 10-15 million of illegals (that's just the number JOE let in) here then you are the stupid one.

Illegals have been coming across since our country was founded.
can you find me a single reputable source for that number or you just going by vibes?

Going to take more than feeling to convince me 1 of 8 people here are illegal.

And I would support legislation to get more money and manpower if that is what is needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

Allornothing

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
11,743
12,997
113
can you find me a single reputable source for that number or you just going by vibes?

Going to take more than feeling to convince me 1 of 8 people here are illegal.

And I would support legislation to get more money and manpower if that is what is needed.
I'm just telling you illegal immigration has been going on for over 50 years. The 10-15 million is just what we saw over the 4 years during Biden.

I believe it is much more than that.
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,186
21,593
113
I'm just telling you illegal immigration has been going on for over 50 years. The 10-15 million is just what we saw over the 4 years during Biden.

I believe it is much more than that.
Agreed on your first sentence. They should definitely try to compromise and pass legislation to try to fix it.

I disagree with what you believe from there. But neither of us can technically prove the other right or wrong so we’ll just agree to disagree and say Go Tigers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
25,554
24,391
113
The immigration bill that failed would have allowed illegal immigration to continue up to a certain threshold. Trump reduced it to numbers far below that bill. Looks like republicans were right to squash it. Trump did a much better job.

The proper number of illegal entries is 0
 

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
2,247
3,164
113
The immigration bill that failed would have allowed illegal immigration to continue up to a certain threshold. Trump reduced it to numbers far below that bill. Looks like republicans were right to squash it. Trump did a much better job.

The proper number of illegal entries is 0
We now have a real life demonstration of what is possible to do at the souther border. We just need more of it. More border patrol. More wall. Proof of concept has been 100% successful.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
6,062
9,331
113
We now have a real life demonstration of what is possible to do at the souther border. We just need more of it. More border patrol. More wall. Proof of concept has been 100% successful.
Seems like the right decision was made not to compromise. They were wanting amnesty for those that had been here for more than a few months. I’m all for bipartisanship but it needs to make sense.
 

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
2,247
3,164
113
Seems like the right decision was made not to compromise. They were wanting amnesty for those that had been here for more than a few months. I’m all for bipartisanship but it needs to make sense.
Of course amnesty was in tha bill. Give amnesty to millions and then plan do everything possible above and below board to ensure that the border was never secured. Then use that inital grant of amnesty as precedent for future expansion of it.

There is no question after the Biden presidency, that any talk of really securing the border was lip service.

Republicans agreeing to that bill would have made as much sense as belonging to a cult that promotes dudes showering and competing in sports vs girls and women.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
6,062
9,331
113
Of course amnesty was in tha bill. Give amnesty to millions and then plan do everything possible above and below board to ensure that the border was never secured. Then use that inital grant of amnesty as precedent for future expansion of it.

There is no question after the Biden presidency, that any talk of really securing the border was lip service.

Republicans agreeing to that bill would have made as much sense as belonging to a cult that promotes dudes showering and competing in sports vs girls and women.
I also think they were looking to gain votes in the short term. That’s why they were allowing them to travel to different states on taxpayer dimes. The hope was to resettle them in places like Ohio to create D voters in those swing states. It’s pretty diabolical considering these are people being used as political pawns.
 

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,186
21,593
113
Of course amnesty was in tha bill. Give amnesty to millions and then plan do everything possible above and below board to ensure that the border was never secured. Then use that inital grant of amnesty as precedent for future expansion of it.

There is no question after the Biden presidency, that any talk of really securing the border was lip service.

Republicans agreeing to that bill would have made as much sense as belonging to a cult that promotes dudes showering and competing in sports vs girls and women.
What were the amnesty parts of the bill, truly having trouble finding it. Seems like so much of what Trump is doing or wants to do is covered by the bill. The bill honestly left no one happy (conservatives thought it was too lax, liberals too harsh, which is honestly likely a decent sign of compromise). Bill made it harder to claim asylum, put more money towards agents, clerks, etc to expedite everything (aka if not legit they don’t get to stay here) and when not fast increase detention centers. Also gave the president more power to expel people not entering a port of entry. Even gave DHS more power as well. Bill was co-authored by an immigration hard liner from Oklahoma, and originally endorse by the BP.


The Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024, which included significant changes to immigration policy, primarily focused on border security and asylum reform. Key provisions included streamlining the asylum process at the border, increasing the threshold for passing initial screening, and limiting parole for migrants arriving by land. The bill also allocated funds for border security, including supplemental funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and assistance for newly arrived refugees. [1, 2]
Here's a more detailed breakdown: [1, 1, 2, 2]
  • Asylum Reform: The bill aimed to expedite asylum processing at the border, with a stricter standard for initial screening and limiting the use of parole for those arriving by land. [1, 1, 2, 2]
  • Border Security: The bill provided substantial funding for border security measures, including increased resources for DHS and FEMA to help states and cities manage the influx of migrants. [1, 1, 3, 3]
  • Expulsion Authority: The bill granted the President the authority to summarily expel immigrants who enter the country between ports of entry, unless they meet narrow exceptions, says Immigration Impact. [4, 4]
  • Increased Detention Capacity: The bill included provisions for increasing immigration detention capacity and provided funding to ensure a certain number of detention beds are available, according to the American Immigration Council. [2, 2, 3, 3]
  • Supplemental Funding: The bill allocated significant funds for various agencies, including DHS, ICE, and USCIS, to support expanded operations and expedite processing of asylum claims, reports the Atlantic Council. [1, 3, 3]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] https://immigrationforum.org/articl...ental-appropriations-act-2024-bill-explainer/
[2] https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/analysis-senate-border-bill
[3] https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/con...tion-bill-offers-a-border-blueprint-for-2025/
[4] https://immigrationimpact.com/2024/11/01/what-is-the-bipartisan-border-bill/
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
6,062
9,331
113
What were the amnesty parts of the bill, truly having trouble finding it. Seems like so much of what Trump is doing or wants to do is covered by the bill. The bill honestly left no one happy (conservatives thought it was too lax, liberals too harsh, which is honestly likely a decent sign of compromise). Bill made it harder to claim asylum, put more money towards agents, clerks, etc to expedite everything (aka if not legit they don’t get to stay here) and when not fast increase detention centers. Also gave the president more power to expel people not entering a port of entry. Even gave DHS more power as well. Bill was co-authored by an immigration hard liner from Oklahoma, and originally endorse by the BP.


The Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024, which included significant changes to immigration policy, primarily focused on border security and asylum reform. Key provisions included streamlining the asylum process at the border, increasing the threshold for passing initial screening, and limiting parole for migrants arriving by land. The bill also allocated funds for border security, including supplemental funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and assistance for newly arrived refugees. [1, 2]
Here's a more detailed breakdown: [1, 1, 2, 2]
  • Asylum Reform: The bill aimed to expedite asylum processing at the border, with a stricter standard for initial screening and limiting the use of parole for those arriving by land. [1, 1, 2, 2]
  • Border Security: The bill provided substantial funding for border security measures, including increased resources for DHS and FEMA to help states and cities manage the influx of migrants. [1, 1, 3, 3]
  • Expulsion Authority: The bill granted the President the authority to summarily expel immigrants who enter the country between ports of entry, unless they meet narrow exceptions, says Immigration Impact. [4, 4]
  • Increased Detention Capacity: The bill included provisions for increasing immigration detention capacity and provided funding to ensure a certain number of detention beds are available, according to the American Immigration Council. [2, 2, 3, 3]
  • Supplemental Funding: The bill allocated significant funds for various agencies, including DHS, ICE, and USCIS, to support expanded operations and expedite processing of asylum claims, reports the Atlantic Council. [1, 3, 3]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] https://immigrationforum.org/articl...ental-appropriations-act-2024-bill-explainer/
[2] https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/analysis-senate-border-bill
[3] https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/con...tion-bill-offers-a-border-blueprint-for-2025/
[4] https://immigrationimpact.com/2024/11/01/what-is-the-bipartisan-border-bill/
They expanded refugee status and criteria as opposed to calling it amnesty. They made it easier to claim asylum intentionally. I think that was the argument based on my understanding. IMO the bill isn’t great but it’s not terrible. The actions of D’s before the bill were atrocious and I don’t think people saw that as a good faith solution after what had been going on at the border.

Edit: I think there was also a vague reference to allowing afghans and their allies expedited green cards but I don’t think it was very specific on who qualified.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

UrHuckleberry

Heisman
Jun 2, 2024
10,186
21,593
113
It's all a moot point now. We have now seen what.common sense border reform looks like. and, it works! No need to tie that to anything.
I just keep being told we don’t have the resources to afford every person their constitutional right to due person, which is frustrating considering there was a bipartisan bill to give more resources to just such a thing.
 

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
2,247
3,164
113
I just keep being told we don’t have the resources to afford every person their constitutional right to due person, which is frustrating considering there was a bipartisan bill to give more resources to just such a thing.
You know what is really frustrating to me? It's people that worry more about foreigners than united states citizens.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
25,554
24,391
113
I just keep being told we don’t have the resources to afford every person their constitutional right to due person, which is frustrating considering there was a bipartisan bill to give more resources to just such a thing.
It’s OK. You can tell from Trump’s tweet this morning that we are about to suspend Habeus corpus.

We also just hired another 20,000 agents to help with deportation
 

ANEW

All-Conference
Jul 7, 2023
2,247
3,164
113
It’s OK. You can tell from Trump’s tweet this morning that we are about to suspend Habeus corpus.

We also just hired another 20,000 agents to help with deportation

Reduce government headcount that is focused more on foreigners and/or woke idology and put that towards deporting illegals. That's government working for We The People. Good to see.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
6,062
9,331
113
I just keep being told we don’t have the resources to afford every person their constitutional right to due person, which is frustrating considering there was a bipartisan bill to give more resources to just such a thing.
You also keep being told that under Expedited Removal Act that due process is being applied administratively by two separate border agents as per the law signed into effect by Bill Clinton, but that’s not good enough for you. For some reason that was ok for Clinton and Obama but not this administration. The reason we don’t have the resources is we had an administration illegally open the border, this was not an issue (to this magnitude) prior to the Biden administration full stop. We have said this 50 million times, you don’t get to illegally open the border, illegally provide them with money and phones and plane tickets, illegally resettle them all over the country, then ***** and moan when they’re removed. They. Are. Illegal. You’re so damn worried about this interpretation of law but what about the 100’s of thousands trying to enter the country the right way and do this legally, you spit in their face as much as you spit in the faces of Americans that are impacted by this. We are not rewarding illegal behavior by giving them phones, money and court dates and indefinite stays in our country. Get over it. I know you’re sensitive so I want say your bff did this. But that’s what happened. They created a huge problem, then tried to crowbar their solution for the problem they created that wasn’t there. Bunch of morons in that administration.

Edit: for confirmation on my moron claim I’d present that the Biden administration wanted middle class workers fired and their families ruined for refusing to take an experimental vaccine—even though it didn’t even meet the pre-2021 definition of a vaccine; this is who you’re dealing with. Dumbasses. We will ruin Americans lives for not injecting themselves with an experimental vaccine then turn around and let in 15-20 million people that are from third world countries and certainly not all vaccinated (they really don’t care about that, they didn’t even attempt to vet them). See the hypocrisy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
25,554
24,391
113
You also keep being told that under Expedited Removal Act that due process is being applied administratively by two separate border agents as per the law signed into effect by Bill Clinton, but that’s not good enough for you. For some reason that was ok for Clinton and Obama but not this administration. The reason we don’t have the resources is we had an administration illegally open the border, this was not an issue (to this magnitude) prior to the Biden administration full stop. We have said this 50 million times, you don’t get to illegally open the border, illegally provide them with money and phones and plane tickets, illegally resettle them all over the country, then ***** and moan when they’re removed. They. Are. Illegal. You’re so damn worried about this interpretation of law but what about the 100’s of thousands trying to enter the country the right way and do this legally, you spit in their face as much as you spit in the faces of Americans that are impacted by this. We are not rewarding illegal behavior by giving them phones, money and court dates and indefinite stays in our country. Get over it. I know you’re sensitive so I want say your bff did this. But that’s what happened. They created a huge problem, then tried to crowbar their solution for the problem they created that wasn’t there. Bunch of morons in that administration.

Edit: for confirmation on my moron claim I’d present that the Biden administration wanted middle class workers fired and their families ruined for refusing to take an experimental vaccine—even though it didn’t even meet the pre-2021 definition of a vaccine; this is who you’re dealing with. Dumbasses. We will ruin Americans lives for not injecting themselves with an experimental vaccine then turn around and let in 15-20 million people that are from third world countries and certainly not all vaccinated (they really don’t care about that, they didn’t even attempt to vet them). See the hypocrisy.
Democrats want to rule with an iron fist. Can you imagine if girl boss retard Kamala was president? I’m not sure the country would have survived four more years of stupid.

They have no power. They are sub 20% approval. They have no ideas. They have no leadership.

They are doing decades of damage to their party. We try to help them, bur they want to die on the illegal immigration hill. The only logical explanation is that they want the votes.

They will get trounced in midterms. We will see if that is a wake up call for them.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,255
26,991
113
Says the quiet part out loud

 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
6,062
9,331
113
Across the pond they are starting to realize they have a problem. You know it’s getting wild when Starmer is claiming the UK has an immigration problem. Hopefully a death blow to globalism. There’s not a more liberal leader on the planet and even he sees this is an unsustainable assault on nations.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer calls for the UK to take back its borders, says the UK is becoming an “island of strangers” and immigrants should learn how to speak English.

Wow.

“Without [strict rules], we risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.”

“So when you have an immigration system that seems almost designed to permit abuse … then you're not championing growth, you're not championing justice, or however else people defend the status quo.”

“You're actually contributing to the forces that are slowly pulling our country apart. So, yes, I believe in this. I believe we need to reduce immigration significantly.”