Heritage Foundation Project 2025

okclem

Heisman
Apr 2, 2007
27,529
57,513
113
Bump, this stays on the first page.

How is Department of Life and different than Ministry of Love?
 

hopefultiger13

Heisman
Aug 20, 2008
10,803
16,966
113
Yeah... Back in the early 1800s this was actually the way it used to be. When Presidents changed, civil servants changed with them. So you had basically the whole government changing when a new party took power. It worked out SO WELL, that even the folks that got to give everyone they knew and owed jobs, decided that this was probably a bad idea and changed it. This guy will be ALL ABOUT firing folks that don't agree with him... and then bitching and whining when these same folks get fired when the next Democratic president come into office.

And think about this... This guy is saying that some government employees are not acting in a neutral manner. That's probably true (for both sides). But ... JUST IMAGINE what would happen in an election year where government employees' JOBS depended on the current party staying in power. Even stupid people should realize that would be WORSE than what we have now.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
44,361
33,452
113
Straight from the horse's mouth, they're going for a Christian Nationalist government.


I actually watched this video and it said nothing about a christian nationalist govt. Thanks for making the refute easy. I did agree with everything the guy from the heritage foundation said though on policy from the part he got to say in between being interrupted continuously by the host.
 

okclem

Heisman
Apr 2, 2007
27,529
57,513
113
I actually watched this video and it said nothing about a christian nationalist govt. Thanks for making the refute easy. I did agree with everything the guy from the heritage foundation said though on policy from the part he got to say in between being interrupted continuously by the host.
Just the response I'd expect from a nazi
 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan

dbjork6317

Heisman
Dec 3, 2009
18,213
70,898
113
Yeah... Back in the early 1800s this was actually the way it used to be. When Presidents changed, civil servants changed with them. So you had basically the whole government changing when a new party took power. It worked out SO WELL, that even the folks that got to give everyone they knew and owed jobs, decided that this was probably a bad idea and changed it. This guy will be ALL ABOUT firing folks that don't agree with him... and then bitching and whining when these same folks get fired when the next Democratic president come into office.

And think about this... This guy is saying that some government employees are not acting in a neutral manner. That's probably true (for both sides). But ... JUST IMAGINE what would happen in an election year where government employees' JOBS depended on the current party staying in power. Even stupid people should realize that would be WORSE than what we have now.
Not to mention that executive power and reach has expanded significantly over the last century. There are pros and cons to this, but the obvious con is that something like project 2025 would immediately allow for the executive to have a far ranging impact on…everything.

Imagine someone from NOAA saying “hey there’s a big hurricane that’s going to hit the east coast” and the President deciding “nah, I don’t think it will.” And just firing people until he got someone willing to put out a statement that no hurricane is coming.

That’s the door that’s being opened by project 2025 for every single federal agency.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: Dadar and dpic73

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
44,361
33,452
113
Not to mention that executive power and reach has expanded significantly over the last century. There are pros and cons to this, but the obvious con is that something like project 2025 would immediately allow for the executive to have a far ranging impact on…everything.

Imagine someone from NOAA saying “hey there’s a big hurricane that’s going to hit the east coast” and the President deciding “nah, I don’t think it will.” And just firing people until he got someone willing to put out a statement that no hurricane is coming.

That’s the door that’s being opened by project 2025 for every single federal agency.
Imagine the current govt being run by the equivalent of an organized crime syndicate. How do we fix that?
 

Dadar

All-Conference
Dec 21, 2003
4,502
3,396
113
Not to mention that executive power and reach has expanded significantly over the last century. There are pros and cons to this, but the obvious con is that something like project 2025 would immediately allow for the executive to have a far ranging impact on…everything.

Imagine someone from NOAA saying “hey there’s a big hurricane that’s going to hit the east coast” and the President deciding “nah, I don’t think it will.” And just firing people until he got someone willing to put out a statement that no hurricane is coming.

That’s the door that’s being opened by project 2025 for every single federal agency.
Trump is using the Putin play book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: okclem

nytigerfan

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
10,317
13,294
102
Not to mention that executive power and reach has expanded significantly over the last century. There are pros and cons to this, but the obvious con is that something like project 2025 would immediately allow for the executive to have a far ranging impact on…everything.

Imagine someone from NOAA saying “hey there’s a big hurricane that’s going to hit the east coast” and the President deciding “nah, I don’t think it will.” And just firing people until he got someone willing to put out a statement that no hurricane is coming.

That’s the door that’s being opened by project 2025 for every single federal agency.

Hilariously, this has already happened. Trump said a hurricane was going to hit Alabama l, and when NOAA clarified that is was not Trump had the director fired for publicly disagreeing with him. Then the dipshit got a sharpie and drew on weather map.

Can’t make that **** up.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
44,361
33,452
113
Trump has already publicly stated that project 2025 is not a guiding document for him.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
44,361
33,452
113


They lied about the fine people hoax.

They lied about the losers and suckers hoax.

They lied about the Russia collusion hoax.

They lied about the bleach hoax.

They lied about the phone call with Ukraine.

They lied about the vaax.

They lied about social distancing.

They lied about masks.

They lied about the origins of COVID.

They lied to you about J6.

They lied to you about the bloodbath hoax.

They lied to about Joe Biden’s dementia.

But sure they are telling you the truth about Project 2025.

🤡
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
29,831
22,012
113
  • Like
Reactions: okclem

Willence

Heisman
Dec 26, 2003
14,790
35,946
113
What a poor messenger for conservative principles and views. Really embarrassing display. He should resign immediately though I actually have no idea what's going on at Heritage anymore. They seem to have gone insane as well. Wish I could go on that show and talk to those folks. That would have gone a lot differently.

As someone is against abortion in every case except the life of the mother, having something named the Department of Life is absurd. These folks do not understand what needs to happen with these types of issues. You should not and can not force things down people's throat. You should and can make an argument, back it with evidence and try to win the argument in such a way that people choose to see things a different way. So many stupid people on the right that just don't know how to discuss any of these issues.
 

okclem

Heisman
Apr 2, 2007
27,529
57,513
113
The movement that aims to outlaw pornography and jail anyone involved in pornography is threatening bloodshed in the streets if they don't get the messiah who has affairs with porn stars.

Mark Twain would've loved this.