Continued election Interference and politically motivated lawsuits by dirty dems.
Openly endorsing election Interference. Par for the course.Trump is the grand poobah of dirty and he should be in jail. If his election chances are interfered with because of this, he bigly deserves it because that's what he's earned. Just because you don't like it when the criminal you love is held accountable, doesn't mean it's wrong. These patriots are doing a service to America. Cry more magat boy
They are trying to uphold the Constitution - you know the founding document that your corpulent carrotman thinks should be overturned because America couldn't see Hunter's dick pics for a few days.Openly endorsing election Interference. Par for the course.
You do not know what you are talking about. The requirements to invoke the 14th amendment have not been met Einstein.They are trying to uphold the Constitution - you know the founding document that your corpulent carrotman thinks should be overturned because America couldn't see Hunter's dick pics for a few days.
It has been used for much less than what Trump did! In fact, no President has ever come close to doing what that seditious POS did.You do not know what you are talking about. The requirements to invoke the 14th amendment have not been met Einstein.
Please do tell then. Elucidate us please.It has been used for much less than what Trump did! In fact, no President has ever come close to doing what that seditious POS did.
"States have also enforced Section 3 against their officials, both before and after the passage and repeal of the Ku Klux Klan Act. In one early example, county commissioners in North Carolina refused to induct a man who had been elected Sheriff due to his service to the Confederate government in the same position.18 This action was eventually approved by the North Carolina Supreme Court; the United States Supreme Court dismissed the sheriff’s appeal.19 The most recent Section 3 disqualification occurred in September 2022, when a New Mexico court disqualified county commissioner Couy Griffin in a state-law quo warranto lawsuit brought by New Mexico residents.20"Please do tell then. Elucidate us please.
This is far left wing propaganda and wish porn."States have also enforced Section 3 against their officials, both before and after the passage and repeal of the Ku Klux Klan Act. In one early example, county commissioners in North Carolina refused to induct a man who had been elected Sheriff due to his service to the Confederate government in the same position.18 This action was eventually approved by the North Carolina Supreme Court; the United States Supreme Court dismissed the sheriff’s appeal.19 The most recent Section 3 disqualification occurred in September 2022, when a New Mexico court disqualified county commissioner Couy Griffin in a state-law quo warranto lawsuit brought by New Mexico residents.20"
Are you telling me these cases aren't real? Because you can read the case details for yourself, derp.This is far left wing propaganda and wish porn.
I am not disputing those cases but its not a valid comparison. Watch it play out as even if one of these cases that are rigged in blue states gets decided along that path then it will go to scotus and be squashed promptly. The total fear of General Trump has you crazy libs going out of your minds and I am getting a great chuckle over it.Are you telling me these cases aren't real? Because you can read the case details for yourself, derp.
Why can't you keep the conversation straight without re-directing it? I said,I am not disputing those cases but its not a valid comparison. Watch it play out as even if one of these cases that are rigged in blue states gets decided along that path then it will go to scotus and be squashed promptly. The total fear of General Trump has you crazy libs going out of your minds and I am getting a great chuckle over it.
You saidIt has been used for much less than what Trump did
Which I did, I told you how it had been used for far less...holy herp derpersonPlease do tell then. Elucidate us please.
All the sordid characters and connections that show up time after time in these shady scams against President Trump. @iceheart08 needs to fess up and do a tell all right here.
Ignored by the Fake News: Kash Patel Just Destroyed the Left’s Lawfare Suit Against Trump in Colorado – Drops Truth Bombs on Liberal Prosecutors, Dashes Hopes of Radical Left to Ban Trump from 2024 Race (VIDEO)
You liberal guys have drank way too much of the commie kool-aid. It's funny to read this wacky stuff yall write though. Thanks for life's little pleasures. LOL!!
This **** AGAIN?
"There is no evidence that Trump actually signed any order requesting 10,000 Guard troops, let alone 20,000, for Jan. 6. Reached for comment, a spokesperson for the Department of Defense provided a timeline of the agency’s involvement in preparing for and responding to the attack on the Capitol. The timeline shows no such order, and notes only that on Jan. 3, the president concurred with activating the D.C. National Guard to support law enforcement at the behest of Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser.
National Guard troops were already activated and deployed to checkpoints around Washington before the violence began. When the rioting started, Bowser requested more Guard help, on behalf of the Capitol Police. That request was made to Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, who then went to Miller, who approved it.
The Pentagon said Miller approved the request without speaking with the White House because he had gotten direction from the president days earlier to do whatever he deemed necessary with the Guard.
Neither Pelosi nor the House sergeant at arms could have stopped an ordered deployment of National Guard troops because Congress doesn’t control the National Guard, legal experts say. Guard troops are generally controlled by governors, though they can be federalized, said William C. Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University.
The online claims “make no sense at all,” Banks said, adding, “The House sergeant at arms, he or she is not in the chain of command. Nor is Nancy Pelosi.”
“The speaker was no more in charge of the security of the U.S. Capitol that day than Mitch McConnell,” Drew Hammill, Pelosi’s deputy chief of staff, told the AP in an email.
The AP has previously reported on false claims that Pelosi blocked the National Guard from coming to the capitol on Jan. 6. As the newly released footage showed, she and McConnell, then Senate majority leader, called for military assistance, including the National Guard, during the attack.
The House sergeant at arms does sit on the Capitol Police Board, which also includes the Senate sergeant at arms and the architect of the Capitol. That board opted not to request the Guard ahead of the insurrection, but did eventually request assistance after the rioting had already begun. There is no evidence that either Pelosi or McConnell directed the security officials not to call the guard beforehand, and Hammill said after the insurrection that Pelosi was never informed of such a request."
Tiger Illustrated
What people are telling us about Clemson's running game
Tiger Illustrated
PART 2: Where every Clemson Football newcomer stands heading into game week
Rivals
47 offers. 40-plus visits. Two finalists for 2028 4-star LB Jay Schell with a decision nearing
Tiger Illustrated
The story on Clemson's situation at quarterback heading into game week
The Bengal Tiger
Projecting LSU week one depth chart vs Clemson