For me, until the NCAA is able to get a true playoff system that gives ALL 128 Div-I football teams a shot, then I really think the idea of parity is a lost cause. Right now there is more parity in college football then say 30 years ago, but it's really done nothing but add more confusion and debate to the game. Why try to create parity between 128 programs, when you have a "selection" committee picking 4 teams for a playoff. It just allows more and more teams outside of the chosen 4 to complain and gripe about being left out.
In the NFL, MLB, and the NBA I can understand parity. The structure is designed for it. And with fewer teams it's much more feasible.
And really, the powerhouse programs still have a clear advantage these days regardless due to their larger athletic budgets that fuel money into superior facilities and such. The smaller programs will never be able to compete with that. So parity in college football is overall an illusion.
But I see exactly what you are saying Medic. And I do agree with you in a way. I'm not a big fan of creating an environment of programs loading up rosters with elite talent because they have the inside track to endorsement deals. But at the same time I don't like the idea of the college football industry generating billions a year and the players just need to be happy with an education and a roof over their heads.
I understand the obscene money generated by college football. On the college side, most of that money goes into covering the costs associated with the football program and the other sports. That's where many athletic departments go into the red though.
Guys like Joe Castiglione and Danny Davis aren't rolling in dollars. OU spends a lot of money on fan experience and safety in addition to the crazy costs of the athletic side. If you really dig into the numbers, the OUAD relies on big donor dollars to fund the arms race on facilities because the football program doesn't make anywhere close to the amount of money it takes to keep up.
I get what you're saying about compensation. I'm just looking at it from the ability of a college to pay for it. Most colleges couldn't afford it. And endorsement deals will literally open the flood gates of dollars the NCAA tries to keep out to better level an already unlevel playing field. Some might think I'm a socialist or communist, but as the college football world moves closer to mega conferences and TV deals, a league wide revenue sharing program might be needed for colleges, even those in our own conference, to continue to fund football teams.
Don't get me started on the playoff/bowl racket. I know how to find you on Facebook so the conversation will never turn off, much like the TV on Poltergeist.
