Schiano is truly playing out the scenario of either dying a hero, or living long enough to see himself become the villain. If he willing to 100% withdraw his buyout protection for NIL to go all in, with a caveat that he retires quietly with no grudges if he fails, then I can get behind that. I dont think that it is legitimate though.It sounds like something possible. Schiano just flipping everyone the bird (for ego and a check) and staying on while people resent him is a bad scenario. The suggested solution makes a lot of people look good at a time when options are skinny.
Anything that gets him shown the door as quickly as possibleIt's an interesting idea and something that I think the fanbase would get behind
So.... Can we still fire him after loss 7 in 2027 and not pay him the buyout?
What is playing out 2027 and "saving a buyout fee"...
2-1, 3-0 vs Akron, BC, LIU
1-3, 2-2 vs MD, Wash, @ MSU, @ Nebraska
0-5, 1-4 vs OSU, Mich, @Ind, @NW, @UCLA
Going to change in 2027? 3-9 to 6-6?
Since 2020 in conference bottom 5 in conference,
Rutgers 16-44, 9-9 vs those teams, 7-35 0.167 vs everyone else.
Maryland 16-40
Nebraska 19-40
Purdue 19-39
Michigan St 19-39
7 other wins,
2021 @ Illinois (5-7), @ Indiana(2-10), 2022 Vs Indiana(4-8), 2023 vs NW(8-5), @ Indiana(3-9), 2024 vs Wash(6-7), Vs Minnesota(8-5).
Overall 33-48
Non conference 17-4(1-2 bowls)
Home 6-24(18-25 overall) 12-1 Non conf
Road 10-20(14-21 overall) 4-1 Non conf
6 home B1G wins in almost 7 years.
Flood(4-12) Home 2-6 Road 2-6
Ash(3-27/3-33) Home 2-12/2-16, Road 1-14/1-17, /wCampanile
Add 1-2 for 2026 and 3-0, 3-6 in 2027
Schiano will still be 34-50(17-46) 2026 and between 37-59(18-54) sand 40-56(20-52) at best after 2027.
There has to be an option out there in 2026 that's willing to fix this, unless they sent out feelers and got no nibbles is the only explanation.
But what does “improve” mean? So we go 2-10 this year. Then he goes 3-9 next year and we’ve improved. What is the benchmark? A bowl?
This is fantastic. I never saw it before.
Ask Indiana and UCLA which is better! It’s always the coach!I’ll believe he walks away when I see it, but dumping more money on the roster is a much better investment then paying out a coach and staff and overpaying on an unproven new coach and staff.
Should we ask Nebraska, Purdue and Michigan State, too? How about Penn State?Ask Indiana and UCLA which is better! It’s always the coach!
We can go back and forthShould we ask Nebraska, Purdue and Michigan State, too? How about Penn State?
Especially since Indiana and UCLA hired proven winners.Ask Indiana and UCLA which is better! It’s always the coach!
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football star wideout KJ Duff ruled out for rest of season
On3 Football
College Football Announcer Schedule: Broadcasters for top Week 11 games
On3 Football
ESPN updates FPI rankings for each Big Ten football team after Week 10
The Knight Report Basketball
Rutgers vs. Monmouth: How to Watch, Starting Lineups, Rankings & More
The Knight Report
The Knight Report - Ask The Experts Chat: November 11th Edition