A&M is not a good football team

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
21,555
18,311
113
No, they are not. With how bad we were playing, a good team would’ve beaten us easily today.

Nevertheless, we won a game we really had no business winning based on our play. Nothing was working for us today, but we found a way to win.

Hopefully this was our letdown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I4CtheFuture

kidrobinski

All-Conference
Jul 27, 2004
1,725
1,503
113
No, they are not. With how bad we were playing, a good team would’ve beaten us easily today.

Nevertheless, we won a game we really had no business winning based on our play. Nothing was working for us today, but we found a way to win.

Hopefully this was our letdown.
And you know we wouldn’t have found a way to win against ‘a good team’ how?

With respect, this is why it is difficult to have interactions on here sometimes; we perceive two different universes.

Such is life, n’est-ce pas?
 

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
21,555
18,311
113
And you know we wouldn’t have found a way to win against ‘a good team’ how?

With respect, this is why it is difficult to have interactions on here sometimes; we perceive two different universes.

Such is life, n’est-ce pas?

17 points isn't going to win you many conference games.

It's not shocking to acknowledge that we did not play well. We only had 10 points with a little over a minute to go in the game. You can't argue that 10 points is a good game.

BUT we found a way to win even though we weren't playing our best. It's a testament to the mental makeup of the team.

I didn't say we wouldn't have found a way to beat a good team, but with how our D was playing a good team probably turns at least couple of those FG drives into TDs. D gave up plenty of yards.

Sometimes you simply have to gut out a bad performance.
 

Legal_fowl

Junior
Apr 3, 2019
637
391
63
I thought A&M's defense was really good yesterday. Offensively, they moved the ball at will but couldn't get in the endzone.

Honestly, I thought they played much better than I expected based on their schedule results.
 

kidrobinski

All-Conference
Jul 27, 2004
1,725
1,503
113
17 points isn't going to win you many conference games.

It's not shocking to acknowledge that we did not play well. We only had 10 points with a little over a minute to go in the game. You can't argue that 10 points is a good game.

BUT we found a way to win even though we weren't playing our best. It's a testament to the mental makeup of the team.

I didn't say we wouldn't have found a way to beat a good team, but with how our D was playing a good team probably turns at least couple of those FG drives into TDs. D gave up plenty of yards.

Sometimes you simply have to gut out a bad performance.
Matchups, my friend. Uber quick scat qb, super stout and quick lines both sides, quick linebackers. See the common word? Matchups.
 

Go Gamecocks

All-Conference
Jan 19, 2021
1,832
1,511
113
I thought A&M's defense was really good yesterday. Offensively, they moved the ball at will but couldn't get in the endzone.

Honestly, I thought they played much better than I expected based on their schedule results.
They've stepped up their run defense their last 2 games. Take away the big Sellers run, and we fared no better than 'Bama on the ground.

Should be interesting to see how they play their next 3 games....they could be a spoiler.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Legal_fowl

Skuddy

All-Conference
Feb 23, 2022
2,003
4,036
113
If you look at the level at which aTm recruits and the amount of resources they have, they are almost always a disappointment.
 

sclawman77

All-Conference
Jun 27, 2011
1,836
1,692
113
I think its because the entire place and its people are extremely weird
Right. Were their fans practicing 12th man cheers at the Statehouse grounds again? They must practice that in their sleep.
 
Last edited:

TheRoo

Joined Nov 3, 2021
Feb 6, 2022
641
276
63
And you know we wouldn’t have found a way to win against ‘a good team’ how?

With respect, this is why it is difficult to have interactions on here sometimes; we perceive two different universes.

Such is life, n’est-ce pas?
Yep. Any team in the league would be happy beating UF, UT, OU and A&M in four straight.

This is why I give Botman and the BOTs such crap for their constant propaganda and trolling.

Each week, they go out of their way to explain why a win was actually less meaningful believed and that our team (and/or player) really isn't that good.

Either a massively jaded fan or not a fan at all.

Hard to tell.
 

Bubba Fett

Joined Oct 6, 2000
Feb 1, 2022
2,337
2,239
113
I'm wondering how they knew 4 out of 5 times what gap we were going to try to run? They had a key on our running plays.
 

TheRoo

Joined Nov 3, 2021
Feb 6, 2022
641
276
63
I'm wondering how they knew 4 out of 5 times what gap we were going to try to run? They had a key on our running plays.

Maybe -- They had some talented fronts and It looked to me like they were going to force Sellers to beat them with his arm.

Expect UGA to do the same thing at a higher degree.
 

Go Gamecocks

All-Conference
Jan 19, 2021
1,832
1,511
113
I'm wondering how they knew 4 out of 5 times what gap we were going to try to run? They had a key on our running plays.
The big Sellers run looks like classic zone read w/RPO. Watch the TAMU defenders @ :25. They crowd the LOS, but are burned by the outside QB keeper.

 

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
21,555
18,311
113
Very surprising how far TAMU has fallen from last year.
EOY # 7 in the CFP.
# Freefall.

Several weeks ago, someone had a breakdown and showed how much money A&M has spent since firing Kevin Sumlin. Compared to his winning percentage, they have spent a staggering amount of money for a small handful of extra wins.
 

TheRoo

Joined Nov 3, 2021
Feb 6, 2022
641
276
63
Not looking forward to that matchup, 😬
Yep. I'd like our chances a little better if Fuller was available.

On the positive --- IF we can get by ARK, at least we get to play the best team in the country at the end of the season in our stadium.

The heck with the playoffs for the time being -- That's a National Championship caliber game for us.

If we were to somehow win, that probably would be the biggest win in history (surpassing the BAMA victory).

If we lose, maybe we go into Clemson and blow the doors off of them to close the season. :)
 

RUMMENIGGE

Senior
Dec 14, 2016
1,357
894
113
17 points isn't going to win you many conference games.

It's not shocking to acknowledge that we did not play well. We only had 10 points with a little over a minute to go in the game. You can't argue that 10 points is a good game.

BUT we found a way to win even though we weren't playing our best. It's a testament to the mental makeup of the team.

I didn't say we wouldn't have found a way to beat a good team, but with how our D was playing a good team probably turns at least couple of those FG drives into TDs. D gave up plenty of yards.

Sometimes you simply have to gut out a bad performance.
Do you think the injury with Sunset Superman could be why South Carolina only scored 17 points?
 

kidrobinski

All-Conference
Jul 27, 2004
1,725
1,503
113
So you disagree with the premise that an and A&M is a good team??
Not sure I understand that there question.

I do not think A&M is a bad football team, by a long shot, in spite of their record. They are big, tough, hard hitting and quick, they played with focus and were well coached as usual. They had an excellent game plan and were hurting us in the areas where we do not match up well with them. To label them as ‘not a good football team’ is kind of silly imo, and I view it as a passive aggressive indirect swipe at Beamer to throw shade on our team and results which again, is kind of silly.
 

Statepawdog

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2016
1,269
1,548
113
I thought A&M's defense was really good yesterday. Offensively, they moved the ball at will but couldn't get in the endzone.

Honestly, I thought they played much better than I expected based on their schedule results.
I thought A&M's defense was really good yesterday. Offensively, they moved the ball at will but couldn't get in the endzone.

Honestly, I thought they played much better than I expected based on their schedule results.
What killed A&M were their poor receivers. In the past, they seemed to have excellent receivers, not this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Legal_fowl

18IsTheMan

Heisman
Oct 1, 2014
21,555
18,311
113
Not sure I understand that there question.

I do not think A&M is a bad football team, by a long shot, in spite of their record. They are big, tough, hard hitting and quick, they played with focus and were well coached as usual. They had an excellent game plan and were hurting us in the areas where we do not match up well with them. To label them as ‘not a good football team’ is kind of silly imo, and I view it as a passive aggressive indirect swipe at Beamer to throw shade on our team and results which again, is kind of silly.

As the saying goes, you are what your record says you are, and they are 1-5 in conference play.
 
GamecockCentral

Latest

  1. 01 TheBigSpur South Carolina's pitching staff appears deeper than originally thought | Intel Briefing
  2. 02 GamecockCentral Football Grading the Gamecocks' performance in gutsy win over Texas A&M
  3. 03 GamecockCentral Football Thoughts on South Carolina's win over Texas A&M
  4. 04 GamecockCentral Football South Carolina quarterback LaNorris Sellers earns spot as Maxwell Award Semifinalist
  5. 05 GamecockCentral Baseball Recruiting South Carolina 'felt like a home pretty instantly' for 2027 RHP Nate Kesselmark