That adds close to $3 billion in spending ($130k per year, 40 years, 548 murderers)
And the victim’s family?Studies have shown Death penalty to be much more costly than life in prison...
Also, after what recently happened in Tennessee, capital punishment has some issues...
And the victim’s family?
Holy shitte are you serious?Is killing them going to bring their loved ones back?
Commuting doesn't excuse,it doesn't release them to the public.
I.bet that frightens the little gash between your legs doesn’t itI can't believe we were that close to live public executions. Whew.
That's the old Mario Cuomo argument. It's only true because the government pays for decades of legal appeals, longer trials, exhaustive procedures, etc.Studies have shown Death penalty to be much more costly than life in prison...
Holy shitte are you serious?
Do you have children?
In my lifetime, I've seen people freak out because someone said a cuss word on primetime television to a Secretary of Defense wanting to televise the execution of a human being.I.bet that frightens the little gash between your legs doesn’t it![]()
That's the old Mario Cuomo argument. It's only true because the government pays for decades of legal appeals, longer trials, exhaustive procedures, etc.
I understand the debate over the morality of the death penalty but arguing against it because it saves money is just dumb. Change the laws that make it that way.
You are sick phuckCompletely serious.
Are you Pro-Life?
this debate has been going on for decades, and likely will go on for decades more. We go from an eye for an eye, to the preservation of life...In my lifetime, I've seen people freak out because someone said a cuss word on primetime television to a Secretary of Defense wanting to televise the execution of a human being.
I have seen people die before, its not a pleasant thing. If you think it is, then you might need to seek some help.
You are sick phuck
Seriously
this debate has been going on for decades, and likely will go on for decades more. We go from an eye for an eye, to the preservation of life...
“ I understand the debate over the morality of the death penalty”That's the old Mario Cuomo argument. It's only true because the government pays for decades of legal appeals, longer trials, exhaustive procedures, etc.
I understand the debate over the morality of the death penalty but arguing against it because it saves money is just dumb. Change the laws that make it that way.
“ And you are an idiot who can't have a discussion without middle school level intellect and insults.”And you are an idiot who can't have a discussion without middle school level intellect and insults.
Feel free to provide facts to support your "position" whatever you are actually trying to say in this thread.
“ I tend to be against the Death Penalty”Agreed. It's honestly not a debate even worth having since everyone is so dug in on their positions.
I tend to be against the Death Penalty because of historic issues on inequity and repeated cases of innocent people executed after new evidence.
Studies have shown Death penalty to be much more costly than life in prison...
Also, after what recently happened in Tennessee, capital punishment has some issues...
If these people aren't guilty they shouldn't server life in prison either. The reality is they have been found guilty at least twice in you include appeal. Most have eye witnesses or even video evidence. I see no sense in it dragging on. If your argument is that they didn't have good lawyers that's a separate issue.And we could argue that, but there are some serious issues with the death penalty such as access to legal council for poor defendants, etc. There is a long well documented history of inequality in death case results due to financial means.
Honestly, you and I could probably go back and forth about this topic and nauseum, but this in California isn't really that big of a deal.
You are sick phuck
Seriously
Well just let them out. That's cheaper yet!!!
Never suggested that and neither has anyone else, but you do you I guess.
You were the one who brought up cost.
I was responding to a post that was claiming that this move would add millions of cost to the budget. I was pointing out that studies have shown that not to be true.
And I'm pointing out that freeing them like dems like to do is lower cost yet.
Your "solution" isn't one anyone has discussed or considered and isn't relevant.
Lining all convicted criminals up against a wall and shooting them would refuse costs as well...
Tiger Illustrated Football
LIVE UPDATES & DISCUSSION: Clemson at Syracuse
Tiger Illustrated Football
Our final word on Clemson Football ahead of kickoff
Tiger Illustrated Basketball
Buckner's career-high 26 points lead Clemson past American 82-73
Tiger Illustrated Football
Tiger Illustrated's Clemson - Syracuse Forecast
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Friday Recruiting Nuggets