That red wave tomorrow

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
12,504
16,262
113
Polymarket was way out in front on the 2024 election so just for the record, here is what their Senate prediction markets show a day out from the mid-terms.

View attachment 1513493
View attachment 1513495
View attachment 1513529
View attachment 1513497
View attachment 1513498
View attachment 1513502
View attachment 1513513
View attachment 1513516
View attachment 1513518


It just keeps getting worse for democrats. Now the New York Times is saying late deciding voters are leaning plus 9 R
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113


It just keeps getting worse for democrats. Now the New York Times is saying late deciding voters are leaning plus 9 R

That same poll shows a blue tsunami so we'll see soon enough, won't we? NYT/Siena is considered one of the top pollsters, with many rating it as the best.

The NYT/Siena polls show a blue tsunami​

They might be wrong again, but it’s getting hard to deny that polls point toward a really big year for Democrats.​


1793641818796.png
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
12,504
16,262
113
That same poll shows a blue tsunami so we'll see soon enough, won't we? NYT/Siena is considered one of the top pollsters, with many rating it as the best.

The NYT/Siena polls show a blue tsunami​

They might be wrong again, but it’s getting hard to deny that polls point toward a really big year for Democrats.​


View attachment 1513611
Wanna make a fun bet on the outcome of the election tomorrow night? I will trust you on this though I’m sure jhp will tell me I’m being foolish..
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
Wanna make a fun bet on the outcome of the election tomorrow night? I will trust you on this though I’m sure jhp will tell me I’m being foolish..
I've learned my lesson about betting trolls, so no thanks but tell us what you're thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Warlock

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
12,504
16,262
113
I've learned my lesson about betting trolls, so no thanks but tell us what you're thinking.
I was merely going to suggest the loser must make a glazing post about the other confirming how they were right all along and how foolish the loser looks in hindsight. I won’t mock you or call you mean names prior to the conclusion of the wager either. That’s a scruddy guarantee
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
I was merely going to suggest the loser must make a glazing post about the other confirming how they were right all along and how foolish the loser looks in hindsight. I won’t mock you or call you mean names prior to the conclusion of the wager either. That’s a scruddy guarantee
I'm not betting anything but just tell me what you think the polls are wrong about. Which races or do you think they're completely wrong about or do you think they're so off that Repubs will retain control of the House and Senate?
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
12,504
16,262
113
I'm not betting anything but just tell me what you think the polls are wrong about. Which races or do you think they're completely wrong about or do you think they're so off that Repubs will retain control of the House and Senate?
They’re wrong everywhere because they’re mostly fake polls. Republicans win in Michigan, Texas, Ohio, etc

Democrats are floundering late
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
You learned your lesson?! You’re the one that welched because the other guy called you mean names!! 😂 😂 😂

That will go down in board history as one of the most pathetic fails ever…..congrats.
A troll wouldn't understand self-respect or a principled stance that had nothing to do with being afraid of losing a bet because they're simple, immature and aren't interested in adult conversation. Trolls just look for reasons to attack other posters who don't lick the same taint they do because they know they can't win arguments on the merits. If you weren't a troll, you and your "click" would have agreed to the bet when I opted to re-join but that wasn't what interested you. It was the opportunity to call me names and start a thread about it that motivated you, like manna from heaven for trolls, because you're far more juvenile than adult. Grow the F up.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Scrubby

PedMaller3

Sophomore
Oct 10, 2026
242
199
43
A troll wouldn't understand self-respect or a principled stance that had nothing to do with being afraid of losing a bet because they're simple, immature and aren't interested in adult conversation. Trolls just look for reasons to attack other posters who don't lick the same taint they do because they know they can't win arguments on the merits. If you weren't a troll, you and your "click" would have agreed to the bet when I opted to re-join but that wasn't what interested you. It was the opportunity to call me names and start a thread about it that motivated you, like manna from heaven for trolls, because you're far more juvenile than adult. Grow the F up.
Why would we bet someone that bailed on an earlier bet?! Makes no sense…..cause welchers gonna welch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PapaGanoush

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
3,092
4,556
93
They’re wrong everywhere because they’re mostly fake polls. Republicans win in Michigan, Texas, Ohio, etc

Democrats are floundering late
If they indicated the opposite, that the Republicans were going to have a potentially historic day then would they still be fake?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
They’re wrong everywhere because they’re mostly fake polls. Republicans win in Michigan, Texas, Ohio, etc

Democrats are floundering late
This analyst with impressive credentials disagrees. At best, Pubs will still lose by smaller margins than predicted, but they will still lose.

"You don’t have to be a prophet to see what’s coming. No serious analyst thinks Republicans will have a good night as midterm returns roll in. The open question is whether it will be merely bad, terrible or something akin to being eaten by a Cyclops."

1793648283781.png
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
12,504
16,262
113
This analyst with impressive credentials disagrees. At best, Pubs will still lose by smaller margins than predicted, but they will still lose.

"You don’t have to be a prophet to see what’s coming. No serious analyst thinks Republicans will have a good night as midterm returns roll in. The open question is whether it will be merely bad, terrible or something akin to being eaten by a Cyclops."

View attachment 1513804
An analyst with pretty impressive credentials claimed Kamala was going to win Iowa in 2024. That poll was off by nearly 20 points, of course lol still, there were bet welching democrats like yourself and gohox who were willing to make bets on that outcome being real. Cult life must be such a difficult thing for you people. You really do have no clue what is coming for your party tomorrow night. Bless your heart..
 
Nov 19, 2016
8,134
10,375
113
A troll wouldn't understand self-respect or a principled stance that had nothing to do with being afraid of losing a bet because they're simple, immature and aren't interested in adult conversation. Trolls just look for reasons to attack other posters who don't lick the same taint they do because they know they can't win arguments on the merits. If you weren't a troll, you and your "click" would have agreed to the bet when I opted to re-join but that wasn't what interested you. It was the opportunity to call me names and start a thread about it that motivated you, like manna from heaven for trolls, because you're far more juvenile than adult. Grow the F up.
Holy shitte 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
An analyst with pretty impressive credentials claimed Kamala was going to win Iowa in 2024. That poll was off by nearly 20 points, of course lol still, there were bet welching democrats like yourself and gohox who were willing to make bets on that outcome being real. Cult life must be such a difficult thing for you people. You really do have no clue what is coming for your party tomorrow night. Bless your heart..
ONE pollster ≠ ALL pollsters
 

PAWrocka

Heisman
Nov 3, 2008
21,339
28,893
103
Here in Maryland, my ballot is going to be strange. I, a non-MAGA Republican, will be voting for Dan Schwartz over Andy Harris.

Harris is just a stooge for Trump, and has done very little for his District since he has been in Washington. Where my ballot will be strange is that I’ll be against Question 3, which is the Gerrymander question. If your familiar with Maryland, MD District 1 (Andy Harris’ district) is the lone Republican district in the state. A State where 40% of the electorate are registered Rs, only 1 district is red. District 1 includes the top of the Bay and the entirety of the Eastern Shore. If Question 3 passes, District 1 would be gerrymandered in the most egregious and obscene way. The Top of the bay would be redistributed to essentially Baltimore county/city, and the Eastern Shore would now include a corridor that ravages across the bay, include Annapolis, Bowie, some of PG County up to Laurel. For those who don’t know Maryland, that will mean nothing to you, but for those that are ….. its absolutely obscene. It’s so egregious that even Kwasi Infume said it was ridiculous.

I fully expect it to pass because … this state … F! I hate this f’n state… but at least Dan Schwartz is from the Shore, so if he wins our Representative won’t be some liberal retard theybee from Annapolis in 2028.

I also fully expect this F’n state to re-elect Temu Obama/Wes Moore who through his policies wrecked the state economy, credit rating, infrastructure, and to top it off made $8Billion dollars disappear and can’t explain where it went.

as soon as my youngest is out of HS, we are out of here. Just hope I can hang on that long.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
Holy shitte 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
And just like catnip, the trolls and their gurlie emojis come a running.

Face Run GIF
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
We have had four separate polls be revealed to be entirely fabricated in the last two weeks. That doesn’t even include the forever shamed Anne selzer. What else?
The pollsters you're referring to aren't credible and are rarely included in anyone's predictions. Take them out of the equation and the polling is still signaling a blue wave.
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
12,504
16,262
113
The pollsters you're referring to aren't credible and are rarely included in anyone's predictions. Take them out of the equation and the polling is still signaling a blue wave.
They were literally in Nate Silver’s predictions you flailing liar lol



One of these two ended up in photos passed out in a puddle of his own puke, high on drugs (and naked). Which one do you think it was??
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
They were literally in Nate Silver’s predictions you flailing liar lol



One of these two ended up in photos passed out in a puddle of his own puke, high on drugs (and naked). Which one do you think it was??

What part of the word RARELY do you not understand?

The pollsters you're referring to aren't credible and are rarely included in anyone's predictions. Take them out of the equation and the polling is still signaling a blue wave.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
The New York Times also used them. At least 15 times lol

at what point do you admit that “rarely” is an abstract term (as you are using it)?
This will be settled in the next 36 hours so we'll see who's right. It will be fun watching you soil your diaper though.
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
12,504
16,262
113
This will be settled in the next 36 hours so we'll see who's right. It will be fun watching you soil your diaper though.
I’m not Joe Biden meeting the pope. I appreciate you tapping out so quickly after being exposed for your nonsense though. This is an improvement for you. As I always warn you, the longer you debate me the worse it ALWAYS gets for you
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
36,840
34,320
113
I’m not Joe Biden meeting the pope. I appreciate you tapping out so quickly after being exposed for your nonsense though. This is an improvement for you. As I always warn you, the longer you debate me the worse it ALWAYS gets for you
You have a very high opinion of your trolling not shared by the rest of us. Tiring of conversations with non-serious ****-talkers is not tapping out, it's called getting bored. But feel free to call it what you want, I really don't care.

We will find out very soon enough so might as well wait for the results now.
 

baltimorened

All-American
May 29, 2001
9,460
6,850
113
You have a very high opinion of your trolling not shared by the rest of us. Tiring of conversations with non-serious ****-talkers is not tapping out, it's called getting bored. But feel free to call it what you want, I really don't care.

We will find out very soon enough so might as well wait for the results now.
personally I'll be glad when it's over
 
  • Like
Reactions: UrHuckleberry

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
12,504
16,262
113
You have a very high opinion of your trolling not shared by the rest of us. Tiring of conversations with non-serious ****-talkers is not tapping out, it's called getting bored. But feel free to call it what you want, I really don't care.

We will find out very soon enough so might as well wait for the results now.
You claimed something “rarely” happened and I immediately provided multiple examples. You got owned. That’s not the same as being trolled. You’re coping (again)

for real, this will only get worse for you if you want to keep going. Take your L and move along.
 
Tiger Illustrated

Latest

  1. 01 Tiger Illustrated Football The larger story now with Clemson and Florida State we are watching
  2. 02 Tiger Illustrated Football Wednesday Clemson Football Insider: The best case scenario for Tait Reynolds
  3. 03 On3 Football Teams face tough calls on commits with subpar senior film: 'That’s just dead money'
  4. 04 Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting Tuesday Evening Clemson Football Recruiting Nuggets
  5. 05 Tiger Illustrated Football Tuesday Clemson Football Insider