Is FOX NEW Getting Even Worse?

[What Would Jesus Do?]

I could be wrong but I think the current rating is even worse than the last time I looked them up.

Fox News (foxnews.com) – Bias and Credibility​

Fox News (foxnews.com) is rated Right with Low factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

For comparison purposes...

MS Now (MSNBC) – Bias and Credibility​

MS Now (MSNBC) is rated Left with Mixed factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

PBS NewsHour – Bias and Credibility​

PBS NewsHour is rated Left-Center with High factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[tigres88]

Did you see the kid who was interviewed on foxnews who died and was in a coma and claimed to see Jesus?

His description of the ole messiah boi was the same Maga homoerotic talking points about masculinity. It was super weird

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

CNN – Bias and Credibility​

CNN is rated Left-Center with Mostly Factual factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

Washington Post – Bias and Credibility​

Washington Post is rated Left-Center with Mostly Factual factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

These guys have improved their factuality rating since the last time I checked.

Washington Examiner – Bias and Credibility​

Washington Examiner is rated Right-Center with Mostly Factual factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

New York Times – Bias and Credibility​

New York Times is rated Left-Center with High factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

These are the guys who gave Trump Project 2025

Heritage Foundation – Bias and Credibility​

Heritage Foundation is rated Right with Mixed factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

I have these guys on my Roku and routinely tune into them over our typical US offerings like FOX, MS Now or CNN.

France24 – Bias and Credibility​

France24 is rated Least biased with High factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

Even Al Jazeera is better than US mainstream cable networks

Al Jazeera – Bias and Credibility​

Al Jazeera is rated Left-Center with Mixed factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

I could be wrong but I think the current rating is even worse than the last time I looked them up.

Fox News (foxnews.com) – Bias and Credibility​

Fox News (foxnews.com) is rated Right with Low factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

Pretty low rating standards

Fox is dominating audience standards

Guess that does not count as that is objective

Whereas your standards are subjective from biased sources

Who would think how the ratings go

 

[Jfcarter3]

Pretty low rating standards

Fox is dominating audience standards

Guess that does not count as that is objective

Whereas your standards are subjective from biased sources

Who would think how the ratings go

Don't think Fox's audience has standards. Just MAGA echo chambers.

 

[dpic73]

Pretty low rating standards

Fox is dominating audience standards

Guess that does not count as that is objective

Whereas your standards are subjective from biased sources

Who would think how the ratings go

Their low ratings are reflective of their audience's low standards Peepaw.

 

[97ClemsonMac]

Yikes

1. The Five – Fox News (3,146,000)
2. Jesse Watters Primetime – Fox News – (2,758,000)
3. Gutfeld! – Fox News – (2,451,000)
4. Special Report with Bret Baier – Fox News – (2,330,000)
5. Hannity – Fox News – (2,307,000)
6. The Ingraham Angle – Fox News – (2,202,000)
7. The Rachel Maddow Show – MS NOW – (1,915,000)
8. The Will Cain Show – Fox News – (1,824,000)
9. America’s Newsroom – Fox News – (1,651,000)
10. Outnumbered – Fox News – (1,623,000)
11. The Story with Martha MacCallum – Fox News – (1,612,000)
12. The Faulkner Focus – Fox News – ( 1,591,000)
13. America Reports – Fox News – (1,524,000)
14. Fox News at Night – Fox News – (1,330,000)
15. Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell – MS NOW – (1,229,000)

Here Are the 3rd Quarter of 2026 Cable News Ratings

Fox News remained No. 1 during this slow news period

www.adweek.com

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

Pretty low rating standards

Fox is dominating audience standards

Guess that does not count as that is objective

Whereas your standards are subjective from biased sources

Who would think how the ratings go

This is the "logic" of someone arguing that candy must be better for you than broccoli because children prefer candy.

 

[dpic73]

Yikes

1. The Five – Fox News (3,146,000)
2. Jesse Watters Primetime – Fox News – (2,758,000)
3. Gutfeld! – Fox News – (2,451,000)
4. Special Report with Bret Baier – Fox News – (2,330,000)
5. Hannity – Fox News – (2,307,000)
6. The Ingraham Angle – Fox News – (2,202,000)
7. The Rachel Maddow Show – MS NOW – (1,915,000)
8. The Will Cain Show – Fox News – (1,824,000)
9. America’s Newsroom – Fox News – (1,651,000)
10. Outnumbered – Fox News – (1,623,000)
11. The Story with Martha MacCallum – Fox News – (1,612,000)
12. The Faulkner Focus – Fox News – ( 1,591,000)
13. America Reports – Fox News – (1,524,000)
14. Fox News at Night – Fox News – (1,330,000)
15. Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell – MS NOW – (1,229,000)

Here Are the 3rd Quarter of 2026 Cable News Ratings

Fox News remained No. 1 during this slow news period

www.adweek.com

These are not the types of ratings being discussed in this thread but nice try.

 

[kidmike41]

Even Al Jazeera is better than US mainstream cable networks

Al Jazeera – Bias and Credibility​

Al Jazeera is rated Left-Center with Mixed factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

What is the WSJ rated?

 

[Riveting]

I could be wrong but I think the current rating is even worse than the last time I looked them up.

Fox News (foxnews.com) – Bias and Credibility​

Fox News (foxnews.com) is rated Right with Low factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

What is "Media Bias Fact Check" rated?

 

[Riveting]

New York Times – Bias and Credibility​

New York Times is rated Left-Center with High factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

That was proven by the Pulitzer that NYT won for its reporting on the Russian Collusion Scandal.

P.S. They never gave it back after the 'scandal' was proven to be a hoax. Great factual reporting.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

What is the WSJ rated?

WSJ is a tough call. Most give them good marks on their news side but consider their op-ed side a joke.

Wall Street Journal – Bias and Credibility​

Wall Street Journal is rated Right-Center with Mostly Factual factual reporting by Media Bias Fact Check.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

That was proven by the Pulitzer that NYT won for its reporting on the Russian Collusion Scandal.

P.S. They never gave it back after the 'scandal' was proven to be a hoax. Great factual reporting.

You seem to be confused by the word "scandal." Russian involvement was proven, not a hoax. Whether it was a scandal is another matter.

 

[Riveting]

You seem to be confused by the word "scandal." Russian involvement was proven, not a hoax. Whether it was a scandal is another matter.

That Trump was shown not to be involved is yet another matter.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

That Trump was shown not to be involved is yet another matter.

Trump was not "shown not to be involved." IIRC, only Don jr was proven to be involved among the Trump family, but nobody who paid attention thinks Trump was totally out of the loop.

 

[Riveting]

Trump was not "shown not to be involved." IIRC, only Don jr was proven to be involved among the Trump family, but nobody who paid attention thinks Trump was totally out of the loop.

Why would Russia want Hil to win since they knew she was incompetent from her time as Sec. of State - and they had all of her email from her idiotic private server?

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

Why would Russia want Hil to win since they knew she was incompetent from her time as Sec. of State - and they had all of her email from her idiotic private server?

It makes sense that Russia would oppose Hillary. Not because she was incompetent, but because she was a strong opponent who knew how to get things done.

Not sure why you are raising this since it supports the idea that Trump would welcome Russian aid.

 

[Yellowsnow51]

This chart is just Bias ratings. I asked about Bret Baier as he's the only show on FOX primetime I would consider "news" and this is what it said:
According to the Ad Fontes Media bias chart, Special Report with Bret Baier is generally rated as having a lean toward the right while maintaining relatively high reliability for straight news compared to other cable opinion programming. [1]

 

[PalmettoTiger1]

This is the "logic" of someone arguing that candy must be better for you than broccoli because children prefer candy.

Let’s clarify your logic

I put PRIME RIB AND LOBSTER IN MY MOUTH

BECAUSE ITS GREAT

YOU PUT CHICKENSHIT IN YOUR MOUTH BECAUSE THAT IS THE TASTE YOU LIKE

I HOPE THIS CLARIFIES THAT GASLIGHTING AND PROJECTION OF YOUR DIET DOES NOT APPLY TO MY DIET

I EAT HEALTHY WHILE YOU ARE INTO DEMOCRATIC OFFERINGS

 

[tigres88]

Let’s clarify your logic

I put PRIME RIB AND LOBSTER IN MY MOUTH

BECAUSE ITS GREAT

YOU PUT CHICKENSHIT IN YOUR MOUTH BECAUSE THAT IS THE TASTE YOU LIKE

I HOPE THIS CLARIFIES THAT GASLIGHTING AND PROJECTION OF YOUR DIET DOES NOT APPLY TO MY DIET

I EAT HEALTHY WHILE YOU ARE INTO DEMOCRATIC OFFERINGS

Gramps is probably eating pork tenderloin and imitation crab thinking its PRIME RIB AND LOBSTER

 

[dpic73]

Gramps is probably eating pork tenderloin and imitation crab thinking its PRIME RIB AND LOBSTER

Squirrel and crawfish IYAM.

 

[dpic73]

That Trump was shown not to be involved is yet another matter.

 

[Riveting]

View attachment 1473386

Did not exonerate him of what? Being an outsider that the establishment including a corrupt FBI worked to undermine and bring down?

 

[dpic73]

Did not exonerate him of what? Being an outsider that the establishment including a corrupt FBI worked to undermine and bring down?

Collusion. His FBI.

Don't forget that he was the main witness and he refused to be deposed.

He was not exonerated and they could have charged him with obstruction but chose not to.

 

[Riveting]

Collusion. His FBI.

Don't forget that he was the main witness and he refused to be deposed.

He was not exonerated and they could have charged him with obstruction but chose not to.

Don't forget, the FBI offered Steele $1mil to verify his fake dossier. When he couldn't, they used it anyway against Trump.

 

[dpic73]

Don't forget, the FBI offered Steele $1mil to verify his fake dossier. When he couldn't, they used it anyway against Trump.

They used it for ONE FISA warrant, ONE(!) before they quickly determined it wasn't credible. The lies and distortions from you magas about this report are endless but in the end, it was barely relevant, at all.

 

[Riveting]

They used it for ONE FISA warrant, ONE(!) before they quickly determined it wasn't credible. The lies and distortions from you magas about this report are endless but in the end, it was barely relevant, at all.

Good one. There was nothing to "determine". They already knew it wasn't credible because Steele couldn't verify it for 1 mil.

They used it for four (4!) FISA applications. FOUR!

 

[DailyBuck7]

That was proven by the Pulitzer that NYT won for its reporting on the Russian Collusion Scandal.

P.S. They never gave it back after the 'scandal' was proven to be a hoax. Great factual reporting.

You could also add to their fake Pulitzer's, the 1619 project which was based on obvious and easily disproved lies. Fundamentally, the New York times is simply a disinformation provider.

 

[dpic73]

Good one. There was nothing to "determine". They already knew it wasn't credible because Steele couldn't verify it for 1 mil.

They used it for four (4!) FISA applications. FOUR!

Trey Gowdy: "There is a Russia investigation without a dossier. So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the FISA process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower. The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica. The dossier really has nothing to do with George Papadopoulos' meeting in Great Britain. It also doesn't have anything to do with obstruction of justice. So there's going to be a Russia probe, even without a dossier."

Transcript: Rep. Trey Gowdy on "Face the Nation," Feb. 4, 2018

Gowdy, one of the key authors of the so-called Nunes memo, joined us to discuss the Russia investigation, FISA and the Justice Department

www.cbsnews.com

ONE person, 3 renewals!

While each renewal legally required a separate finding of probable cause by a judge, the FBI and Department of Justice continued to cite the same core allegations from the Steele dossier across the initial application and all three renewals. [1, 2, 3]

 

[DailyBuck7]

You seem to be confused by the word "scandal." Russian involvement was proven, not a hoax. Whether it was a scandal is another matter.

Zero collusion and criminal acts by the department of Justice in filing 4 fake Fisas as fishing expeditions based on totally phony Carter Page allegations. (And unpaid volunteer on a a informal committee) He was so innocent that he was begging the FBI to interview him and when they finally did about 5 months too late, he went there without a lawyer. Also, he testified in front of Congress without a lawyer, because the allegations concerning him were obviously ridiculous and ludicrous.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

Did not exonerate him of what?

Conspiring with a foreign power to meddle in US elections in violation of US law.