Iran Revolutionary Guards Endorse Dems in Midterms

Moogy

All-American
Jul 28, 2017
7,706
5,462
113
Policies that lead to the endorsement by murderous Iranian Islamofacists who want to nuke the US.
No, be specific. Because I want to know just what switched me to being a lib, so I can change my voting pattern. Plus, I need to dress different, I need to act different. I have to grow a mustache and get all kinds of robes and lotions .. and a new bedspread, new curtains and thick carpeting and weird lighting.
 

Moogy

All-American
Jul 28, 2017
7,706
5,462
113
When you cannot argue intelligently, play the Fuhrer card.

There's nothing to argue against. Your creation of this thread was borne of utter stupidity, and you are being mocked for it. This has been explained to you multiple times, in a clear and concise manner which no one could not misunderstand. "People being bombed don't want the people bombing them to be in power. News at 11."
 

other1

Heisman
Dec 9, 2004
15,110
14,303
113
Obama's weak, appeasement-motivated JPCOA and planeload of cash, then autopen's weakening of Trump's sanctions.

Biden withdraws Trump's restoration of UN sanctions on Iran | AP News

And are you implying that the endorsement means anything, or what exactly is your point?

>Yes, I was implying the endorsement means something.
Obama's weak, appeasement-motivated JPCOA and planeload of cash, then autopen's weakening of Trump's sanctions.

Biden withdraws Trump's restoration of UN sanctions on Iran | AP News

And are you implying that the endorsement means anything, or what exactly is your point?

>Yes, I was implying the endorsement means something.
A plane load of cash??? Where did you come up with this BS??? Obama had a deal with Iran and trump tore it up. He's such a self centered ahole it's really pathetic
 

Moogy

All-American
Jul 28, 2017
7,706
5,462
113
I can't be specific on what switched you, but no doubt your low IQ played a major role.

Silly billy ... I want to know what policies I now hold that switched me from being a non-lib to a lib. Don't keep being a coward, running away from your stupid suggestions. Man up and stand 10 toes in (could be more or less in your case, due to genetic mutations) in defense of your idiocy. Use your words.
 

Moogy

All-American
Jul 28, 2017
7,706
5,462
113
What point does your jumbled mind think I was trying to prove?
You tried to claim that Dems were the appeasers to your Putie Pie ... and you tried to support this by showing that Trump was the one being "tough" on your Putie Pie. Except, what you showed, was your Fuhrer finally doing something that Dems, Independents, and MAGAts with at least a little bit of humanity left had been pushing for him to do for quite some time. You argued against yourself, and still can't figure out what happened.
 

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,953
4,373
93
What I said before you soiled yourself in hysteria is that Iran prefers appeasement dems.

Now go clean yourself up.
I dunno. Most economically beneficial thing TACO has done is show the “Islamofascists” how to leverage the Strait of Hormuz against the US hurting all US citizens. Seems pretty unAmerican, helping Iran. They may like him more than you think.
 

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,953
4,373
93
you didn't think this was imaginative? where's your sense of humor?
Here’s the thing: there is supposedly some truth in every joke. Problem with you is I can’t tell if some of what you write is more your view of the truth, or a joke.
 

Scrubby

Heisman
Jul 2, 2025
11,875
15,544
113
Who said it was an indictment on the dems?

Did dems infer the KKK endorsement of Trump in 2016 was an indictment on Trump? No, of course not - except in virtually all mainstream media outlets like the one:

Ku Klux Klan newspaper declares support for Trump | Reuters
How much do you think the far left southern poverty law center paid the kkk to claim they supported Trump?
When you cannot argue intelligently, play the Fuhrer card.
It’s all they have to cling to.
I dunno. Most economically beneficial thing TACO has done is show the “Islamofascists” how to leverage the Strait of Hormuz against the US hurting all US citizens. Seems pretty unAmerican, helping Iran. They may like him more than you think.
Someone is unaware of who controls the strait of Hormuz these days and how much oil is flowing through it lol
 

Riveting

All-Conference
Aug 24, 2020
7,354
4,321
113
I dunno. Most economically beneficial thing TACO has done is show the “Islamofascists” how to leverage the Strait of Hormuz against the US hurting all US citizens. Seems pretty unAmerican, helping Iran. They may like him more than you think.
Then they could have endorsed repubs instead of dems for the midterms.

The I-fascists threatened many times in the past to close Hormuz, btw. Not a new idea to them even if you was to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scrubby

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,953
4,373
93
Then they could have endorsed repubs instead of dems for the midterms.

The I-fascists threatened many times in the past to close Hormuz, btw. Not a new idea to them even if you was to you.
Well what a weird coinky dink that it just so happened to occur on dip sh it’s watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,953
4,373
93
How much do you think the far left southern poverty law center paid the kkk to claim they supported Trump?

It’s all they have to cling to.

Someone is unaware of who controls the strait of Hormuz these days and how much oil is flowing through it lol
Someone is just generally, “unaware”.
 

Moogy

All-American
Jul 28, 2017
7,706
5,462
113
Then they could have endorsed repubs instead of dems for the midterms.

The I-fascists threatened many times in the past to close Hormuz, btw. Not a new idea to them even if you was to you.

Ah, so now your claim is that Trump was so completely overmatched and unprepared that he wasn't ready to neutralize a threat that had been made for decades, so any competent leader trying to wage an illegal war would have been ready for it and able to head it off or counter it immediately and completely? And you did this just after trying to prove that Trump wasn't Putie Pie's biznatch by showing that he finally did something to Russia that non-MAGAts have been calling on him to do for quite some time.

Since you keep making arguments that actually back how incompetent Trump is, I guess that makes you a lib. #ThislogicisRiveting
 

Riveting

All-Conference
Aug 24, 2020
7,354
4,321
113
Ah, so now your claim is that Trump was so completely overmatched and unprepared that he wasn't ready to neutralize a threat that had been made for decades, so any competent leader trying to wage an illegal war would have been ready for it and able to head it off or counter it immediately and completely? And you did this just after trying to prove that Trump wasn't Putie Pie's biznatch by showing that he finally did something to Russia that non-MAGAts have been calling on him to do for quite some time.

Since you keep making arguments that actually back how incompetent Trump is, I guess that makes you a lib. #ThislogicisRiveting
Then why didn't the I-fascists endorse repubs instead of dems?
 

Moogy

All-American
Jul 28, 2017
7,706
5,462
113
Then why didn't the I-fascists endorse repubs instead of dems?
Riveting ... you should have heeded the sage advice of Kirk Lazarus in Tropic Thunder - never go full retard. The answer to your question is literally the mocking answer I gave you in my first post here ... people don't like to be bombed. I know. Shocker. Try and take a moment to process that, since it didn't take the first few times I mentioned it. I'm sure you're a special little boy, with lots of amazing talent hidden deep down inside of you, but one thing is for sure ... utilizing logic, and posting arguments ... they aren't among those talents.
 

Riveting

All-Conference
Aug 24, 2020
7,354
4,321
113
Riveting ... you should have heeded the sage advice of Kirk Lazarus in Tropic Thunder - never go full retard. The answer to your question is literally the mocking answer I gave you in my first post here ... people don't like to be bombed. I know. Shocker. Try and take a moment to process that, since it didn't take the first few times I mentioned it. I'm sure you're a special little boy, with lots of amazing talent hidden deep down inside of you, but one thing is for sure ... utilizing logic, and posting arguments ... they aren't among those talents.
Of course I-fascists prefer appeasement, cash payments and weak sanctions to being bombed and crushed economically.

Did you forget that I explained to you to the Iranian Islamofacists are not people? They are a devolved subset of people who follow ignorant 7th century apocalyptic myths. This qualifies them to support the dems along with their primitive allies, the pro-Hamas dems.
 
Last edited:

Moogy

All-American
Jul 28, 2017
7,706
5,462
113
Of course I-fascists prefer appeasement, cash payments and weak sanctions to being bombed and crushed economically.

Did you forget that I explained to you to the Iranian Islamofacists are not people? They are a devolved subset of people who follow ignorant 7th century apocalyptic myths. This qualifies them to support the dems along with their primitive allies, the pro-Hamas dems.
Why did you waste your time concocting such tripe, when you could have been logical, and normal ... and not a psycho ... and just agreed that people don't like being bombed?

Regardless, "I-fascists" are, to you, what Jews were to the Nazis. That tracks.

And, oddly enough, as has also been pointed out, your Fuhrer ran on what you now call "appeasement." No new wars, let alone the illegal variety. The "other guys" shouldn't be POTUS because they were just going to get us into a war with Iran, either as a distraction, or because they were incompetent negotiators. And, yet, here we are, in an illegal war which your Fuhrer, despite his "best efforts," can't negotiate his way out of, despite numerous attempts at "appeasement."

Even the bombed, dead "I-fascists" can present better arguments than you have, to date.
 
Last edited:

Riveting

All-Conference
Aug 24, 2020
7,354
4,321
113
Why did you waste your time concocting such tripe, when you could have been logical, and normal ... and not a psycho ... and just agreed that people don't like being bombed?

Regardless, "I-fascists" are, to you, what Jews were to the Nazis. That tracks.

And, oddly enough, as has also been pointed out, your Fuhrer ran on what you now call "appeasement." No new wars, let alone the illegal variety. The "other guys" shouldn't be POTUS because they were just going to get us into a war with Iran, either as a distraction, or because they were incompetent negotiators. And, yet, here we are, in an illegal war which your Fuhrer, despite his "best efforts," can't negotiate his way out of, despite numerous attempts at "appeasement."

Even the bombed, dead "I-fascists" can present better arguments than you have, to date.
To repeat post 27 to you, I have not said people like being bombed. Write that down and repeat it to yourself 25 times - or more if needed.

I don't agree with your idiotic statement that I-fascists that sponsor terror and want to nuke us are the equivalent to what Jews were to nazis. Want to retract that absurdity?
 
Tiger Illustrated

Latest

  1. 01 Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting Clemson Football Roster & Recruiting Big Board: Offensive Line
  2. 02 Tiger Illustrated Football Here's what we know about Clemson's football team entering the open date
  3. 03 Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting MONDAY INSIDER
  4. 04 Tiger Illustrated Football Right now Clemson Football is hard to watch
  5. 05 Tiger Illustrated Football CLEMSON FOOTBALL: The Day After