[Tangentially related: The video linked below is very much worth a watch, for PSU fans]
I would be very surprised if this decline becomes regular or permanent.
That said: It is a HUGE decline year-over-year.
Some relevant info:
Through 4 weeks last year there were 11 ranked-vs-ranked ("Good vs Good") matchups
Through 4 weeks THIS year, there were 12 ranked-vs-ranked ("Good vs Good") matchups.
Suffice to say, not a huge inventory of "must see" gamkes - in either year.
This year, of the 12:
8 of them involved at least one SEC team (and 5 were SEC vs SEC)
4 involved at least one Big Ten team (2 were Big Ten vs Big Ten)
2 involved an ACC team (1 was ACC vs ACC)
1 involved a Big 12 (it was Big 12 vs Big 12)
That is not a lot of marquee games. Would viewership improve with more "Good vs Good"? Probably.
This year's Ranked-vs-Ranked:
OleMiss/Louisville
OSU/Texas
Michigan/Oklahoma
Houston/TexasTech
OleMiss/LSU
SMU/Louisville
Texas/Tennessee
OleMiss/Florida
TAMU/LSU
USC/Oregon
Iowa/Michigan
Missouri/MississippiSt
Would ratings improve with more "Good vs Good"?
Probably. And I am sure the TV folks are pushing for it (especially out of the Big Ten - were you have 18 teams and many weeks of the season you can't find 2 intriguing games to broadcast - not good for the TV folks writing the big checks)
Problem is, most schools outside of the SEC are VERY timid wrt scheduling games against teams they might not walk-over. Something, eventually, has got to give.
Aside from the viewership numbers, what should REALLY concern "college" football powers-that -be:
Situations like last week's PSU - Wisconsin game
A reported 108,000 fans (that was actually no more than 85.000 asses in the seats - and nowhere NEAR 108.000 tickets sold) - for a conference opener - on Homecoming - for an undefeated team with a new coach - on a beautiful afternoon - in the midst of an uber-publicized stadium blowout.
That is shocking.
The TV viewership numbers reflect whether or not there is a general "I am just not that interested anymore" (due to professionalization of the sport or whatever). If that continues, it is not good.
Situations like PSU reflect that - plus, obviously, whether or not folks feel the $ vs benefit equation to buy tickets is worth it.
PSU, in this case, may be the canary in a coal mine - especially if the issues persist over the next couple years.
I have always fully expected that for AT LEAST THE FIRST FEW YEARS of the "renovated stadium" era to lead to very good attendance numbers (and that still may prove to be the case) - before cracks might appear.
But even that is already looking very shaky. About 1/2 of the "premium seating" still unsubscribed for next year? PSU offering (at great reluctance) ticket discounting (after early shoppers already paid full price)?
Some good discussions here, FWIW:
It is nice to finally see some of this stuff said out loud, even though it has been a few frustrating years of people ignoring the obvious - and pimping propaganda.
:
I would be very surprised if this decline becomes regular or permanent.
That said: It is a HUGE decline year-over-year.
Some relevant info:
Through 4 weeks last year there were 11 ranked-vs-ranked ("Good vs Good") matchups
Through 4 weeks THIS year, there were 12 ranked-vs-ranked ("Good vs Good") matchups.
Suffice to say, not a huge inventory of "must see" gamkes - in either year.
This year, of the 12:
8 of them involved at least one SEC team (and 5 were SEC vs SEC)
4 involved at least one Big Ten team (2 were Big Ten vs Big Ten)
2 involved an ACC team (1 was ACC vs ACC)
1 involved a Big 12 (it was Big 12 vs Big 12)
That is not a lot of marquee games. Would viewership improve with more "Good vs Good"? Probably.
This year's Ranked-vs-Ranked:
OleMiss/Louisville
OSU/Texas
Michigan/Oklahoma
Houston/TexasTech
OleMiss/LSU
SMU/Louisville
Texas/Tennessee
OleMiss/Florida
TAMU/LSU
USC/Oregon
Iowa/Michigan
Missouri/MississippiSt
Would ratings improve with more "Good vs Good"?
Probably. And I am sure the TV folks are pushing for it (especially out of the Big Ten - were you have 18 teams and many weeks of the season you can't find 2 intriguing games to broadcast - not good for the TV folks writing the big checks)
Problem is, most schools outside of the SEC are VERY timid wrt scheduling games against teams they might not walk-over. Something, eventually, has got to give.
Aside from the viewership numbers, what should REALLY concern "college" football powers-that -be:
Situations like last week's PSU - Wisconsin game
A reported 108,000 fans (that was actually no more than 85.000 asses in the seats - and nowhere NEAR 108.000 tickets sold) - for a conference opener - on Homecoming - for an undefeated team with a new coach - on a beautiful afternoon - in the midst of an uber-publicized stadium blowout.
That is shocking.
The TV viewership numbers reflect whether or not there is a general "I am just not that interested anymore" (due to professionalization of the sport or whatever). If that continues, it is not good.
Situations like PSU reflect that - plus, obviously, whether or not folks feel the $ vs benefit equation to buy tickets is worth it.
PSU, in this case, may be the canary in a coal mine - especially if the issues persist over the next couple years.
I have always fully expected that for AT LEAST THE FIRST FEW YEARS of the "renovated stadium" era to lead to very good attendance numbers (and that still may prove to be the case) - before cracks might appear.
But even that is already looking very shaky. About 1/2 of the "premium seating" still unsubscribed for next year? PSU offering (at great reluctance) ticket discounting (after early shoppers already paid full price)?
Some good discussions here, FWIW:
It is nice to finally see some of this stuff said out loud, even though it has been a few frustrating years of people ignoring the obvious - and pimping propaganda.
:
