We’re almost a complete football team

TheStateUofMS

All-Conference
Dec 26, 2009
10,397
2,422
113
Need to figure out a pass rush.

Bend but don’t break will suit us fine though. Saw some flashes from guys but nothing consistent. I see some potential. Maybe we can develop some guys. That stunt by Gillette was nice.

Best secondary we’ve ever had. Jett Johnson could have sealed this one earlier.

Defense still hasn’t forced a TO. We had a good season pre Covid where we did not have very many forced turnovers and maybe did not even recover a fumble all season long.

The kicking game is really good.

That punt by Pulliam was insane. The PR overran it like a little league playing CF for the first time- he was not ready for it.

Offense is legit and OL is a pleasant surprise so far
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
60,139
31,104
113
Very few nits to pick here. But pass rush was not good. Also DB allowed a lot of completions. But damn did our secondary do a great job of open field tackling. Overall I’m not sure when I’ve seen a better overall performance from a Mississippi State team.
 

MSUDC11-2.0

Heisman
Sep 29, 2022
10,608
16,779
113
We’ve got some deficiencies still but I thought that was a masterful gameplan by Arnett. He knew that team had zero explosiveness and dared them to try and dink and dunk us to death and knew they couldn’t do that either. When you’re playing a mediocre offense, make them have long drives. Every plan is another opportunity for an offensive penalty, a sack, a TFL, or a turnover. We wore more than content to let them run however many plays they desired.

And then what can you say about Kamario? We have another Dak-type generational talent with this guy. And the rest of the offense brought their A game too. Probably the best that Fluff has ever looked as a Bulldog.
 

Bulldog Bruce

All-American
Nov 1, 2007
5,195
6,372
113
The pressure problem is bigger than y'all think. We knew they were passing every down and still couldn't get to the QB. There were also some pretty wide open receivers when again we knew they were passing. Good thing the Gophers are a running team. When we play a pass heavy team we will need to score a bunch.
 

DAWGSANDSAINTS

All-Conference
Oct 10, 2022
3,305
3,020
113
Very few nits to pick here. But pass rush was not good. Also DB allowed a lot of completions. But damn did our secondary do a great job of open field tackling. Overall I’m not sure when I’ve seen a better overall performance from a Mississippi State team.
Way too many completions in 2nd half but lack of pass rush had a good deal to do with that. That needs to be addressed this week.
Offense in 3rd Qrt was abysmal, we finally got to pushing them around in the 4th Qrt.
Bad snap on the 4th Qrt FG attempt kept us from going over the 40 point mark.
Have no idea what SC has but I would say it’s a very winnable game.
 

vandaldawg

Junior
Feb 23, 2008
2,165
357
83
Need to figure out a pass rush.

Bend but don’t break will suit us fine though. Saw some flashes from guys but nothing consistent. I see some potential. Maybe we can develop some guys. That stunt by Gillette was nice.

Best secondary we’ve ever had. Jett Johnson could have sealed this one earlier.

Defense still hasn’t forced a TO. We had a good season pre Covid where we did not have very many forced turnovers and maybe did not even recover a fumble all season long.

The kicking game is really good.

That punt by Pulliam was insane. The PR overran it like a little league playing CF for the first time- he was not ready for it.

Offense is legit and OL is a pleasant surprise so far
Pulliam is a weapon. He will punt in the NFL.
 

Anon1727472510

Redshirt
Sep 27, 2024
22
14
2
The pressure problem is bigger than y'all think. We knew they were passing every down and still couldn't get to the QB. There were also some pretty wide open receivers when again we knew they were passing. Good thing the Gophers are a running team. When we play a pass heavy team we will need to score a bunch.
Defense for the most part only rushed 4. It appeared the objective was to keep wr/te in front and not allow big plays. This version of Arnett’s defense thus far is less blitz heavy than in previous years. Perhaps we see different packages based on opponents offensive schemes.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
60,139
31,104
113
Good thing SEC is stacked full of run-first QB's.

Arch just got sacked again. He sucks.
If he was as good as the hype, he would have been in the nfl 2 years ago after starting 2 years at Texas. He doesn’t suck. But he’s nothing special either.
 

skydawg1

All-Conference
Jul 31, 2007
5,532
1,944
113
Defense for the most part only rushed 4. It appeared the objective was to keep wr/te in front and not allow big plays. This version of Arnett’s defense thus far is less blitz heavy than in previous years. Perhaps we see different packages based on opponents offensive schemes.
We are saving our defense for the big boys.
 

johnson86-1

All-American
Aug 22, 2012
15,116
5,660
113
The pressure problem is bigger than y'all think. We knew they were passing every down and still couldn't get to the QB. There were also some pretty wide open receivers when again we knew they were passing. Good thing the Gophers are a running team. When we play a pass heavy team we will need to score a bunch.
I mean, I think we know it’s not good enough for us to be a good team, but the opportunity to win 7 or 8 without any crazy upset is there depending on how everybody in our schedule shapes up. I think most people would have taken that in a heartbeat if offered before the season.
 

Bulldog Bruce

All-American
Nov 1, 2007
5,195
6,372
113
Defense for the most part only rushed 4. It appeared the objective was to keep wr/te in front and not allow big plays. This version of Arnett’s defense thus far is less blitz heavy than in previous years. Perhaps we see different packages based on opponents offensive schemes.
Even if that's true if you have 4 guys with their ears pinned back because they are not worried about a run, you should still get home more than we did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HRMSU and patdog

Maroon13

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2022
4,092
4,254
113
That's the only negative of the game is the pass rush.

I think we will be ok at USCe. But if we don't find a way to pressure Simmons (Mo), it could be a long night. I just hope Arnett has some solutions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PapaDawg and patdog

MSUDC11-2.0

Heisman
Sep 29, 2022
10,608
16,779
113
I’m not going to pretend we’ve got a bunch NFL edge rushers or anything but it’s hard for me to panic over the pass rush when we’ve been playing prevent defense with a 3 touchdown lead for like 90% of the season so far. I don’t feel like we’ve seen very much of Arnett’s exotic blitzing yet.
 

skydawg1

All-Conference
Jul 31, 2007
5,532
1,944
113
That's the only negative of the game is the pass rush.

I think we will be ok at USCe. But if we don't find a way to pressure Simmons (Mo), it could be a long night. I just hope Arnett has some solutions.
Dude we have not been trying to pressure anyone in 2 games. Nor will we in game 3. Probably not even vs Miz. We are going to run our offense and outscore these soft defenses. I'm just glad #1 KJones was able to return to the field.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
60,139
31,104
113
I’m not going to pretend we’ve got a bunch NFL edge rushers or anything but it’s hard for me to panic over the pass rush when we’ve been playing prevent defense with a 3 touchdown lead for like 90% of the season so far. I don’t feel like we’ve seen very much of Arnett’s exotic blitzing yet.
We weren’t playing prevent. We were rushing at least 4 and often 5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawgzilla2

MSUDC11-2.0

Heisman
Sep 29, 2022
10,608
16,779
113
We weren’t playing prevent. We were rushing at least 4 and often 5.
We blitzed some but it still felt fairly conservative overall. Less conservative than the ULM game, but still. I felt like our gameplan was very much let’s make them dink and dunk and they’ll eventually fizzle out.
 

TheDawg-Pound

Senior
Dec 21, 2024
912
655
93
Need to figure out a pass rush.

Bend but don’t break will suit us fine though. Saw some flashes from guys but nothing consistent. I see some potential. Maybe we can develop some guys. That stunt by Gillette was nice.

Best secondary we’ve ever had. Jett Johnson could have sealed this one earlier.

Defense still hasn’t forced a TO. We had a good season pre Covid where we did not have very many forced turnovers and maybe did not even recover a fumble all season long.

The kicking game is really good.

That punt by Pulliam was insane. The PR overran it like a little league playing CF for the first time- he was not ready for it.

Offense is legit and OL is a pleasant surprise so far
Absolutely not.
1 we're about to get a bunch of PI calls/ get burned if they don't start turning their heads around looking for the ball
2 Banks/Slay have something to say.
 

lazlow

Senior
Jul 9, 2009
1,263
576
113
Until the other team can score an offensive TD, I'm not that worried about qb sack stats. Those 17'ers werent going anywhere today.
 

Called3rdstrikedawg

All-Conference
May 7, 2016
2,278
1,925
113
I disagree on pressuring Sellers or Simmons. I believe you have to “contain” them. If we get a strong rush and their line starts pushing our guys past Sellers, he will eat us alive with his legs. And then all of a sudden he will have receivers running wide open. If Arnett is going to play the same zone next week he played today, USC is going to get a lot of open receivers for lots of yards. We have to force them to kick field goals from outside the 30 yard line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

TheStateUofMS

All-Conference
Dec 26, 2009
10,397
2,422
113
The pressure problem is bigger than y'all think. We knew they were passing every down and still couldn't get to the QB. There were also some pretty wide open receivers when again we knew they were passing. Good thing the Gophers are a running team. When we play a pass heavy team we will need to score a bunch.
We did only bring 3 a lot of the time. Showed blitz and backed out. Didn’t bring more than 5 often at all.
 

TheStateUofMS

All-Conference
Dec 26, 2009
10,397
2,422
113
Defense for the most part only rushed 4. It appeared the objective was to keep wr/te in front and not allow big plays. This version of Arnett’s defense thus far is less blitz heavy than in previous years. Perhaps we see different packages based on opponents offensive schemes.
Our first two opponents have gotten rid of the ball very quickly, so blitzing likely is not a good strategy. Minnesota took one shot down field all day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patdog

TheStateUofMS

All-Conference
Dec 26, 2009
10,397
2,422
113
I disagree on pressuring Sellers or Simmons. I believe you have to “contain” them. If we get a strong rush and their line starts pushing our guys past Sellers, he will eat us alive with his legs. And then all of a sudden he will have receivers running wide open. If Arnett is going to play the same zone next week he played today, USC is going to get a lot of open receivers for lots of yards. We have to force them to kick field goals from outside the 30 yard line.
Simmons was getting rid of the ball quick last night.

Didn’t watch USCe today.

We can beat anyone with K1.

I think more zone blitz over man vs the SEC is what I’d like to see.
 
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 3 Preview: South Carolina Q&A
  2. 02 Maroon and White South Carolina OC Kendal Briles: Mississippi State Defense brings "lots of problems" to offense
  3. 03 Maroon and White Mississippi State vs. South Carolina History
  4. 04 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 3 Preview: South Carolina Offensive threat
  5. 05 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State estimated 13th in CFP spending among SEC teams