It is time to acknowledge a reality in collegiate tennis: the old model of recruiting the best High school players in the USA, an approach that UNC mastered, may no longer be a viable path to success.
The international player has long been in NCAA tennis, and UNC still competed and excelled. But now that professional tournament winnings are no longer a barrier to playing in college (thanks in part to Reece Brantmeier specifically) there is a massive influx of mid-level pros entering US colleges. A player with a UTR above 11.00 used to be rare. Now there are dozens. In the last couple of years, that shift was almost exclusively in the SEC, with some no name programs suddenly becoming relevant with star players. But it has spread: dook landed two players ranked higher than anyone on UNC's roster a month ago, and now Clemson has followed suit:
They will play this spring in this season's ACC.
Here is the value proposition for the foreign pro players, aside from an education:
- A modest NIL deal that pays all living expenses
- Free housing, travel, coaching, physio, medical, facilities
- Unfettered access to any pro tournaments for 9 months of the year; you only have to do NCAA in the spring.
The pro tour is a grind to make it to the top and the vast majority lose money or break even. It does not provide a good living for anyone except the top 60 or so who reliably gain entry into the 4 main tournaments. That is mainly due to all the expenses that I listed above, which players pay themselves.
To be clear, that same market is open to USA pros as well. Perhaps players like Frey & Nguyen would have skipped college in the past? who knows. But there are many more international semi-pros. it is going to be really hard for UNC to build a perennial top 5 team domestically without heavy reliance on international ringers and transfers, in my estimation.