Judge strikes down Texas ban on drag shows

[THE_DEVIL]

Judge strikes down Texas ban on drag shows, tells people offended by them ‘just don’t go’

The federal judge, who cited Dolly Parton in his ruling, found that the state law violated the First Amendment.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[bdgan]

Judge strikes down Texas ban on drag shows, tells people offended by them ‘just don’t go’

The federal judge, who cited Dolly Parton in his ruling, found that the state law violated the First Amendment.

www.nbcnews.com

As they say the devil is in the details. It seem to me that drag shows should be legal as long as they're limited to adults in closed private areas. Having them in the streets or schools is a much different thing.

 

[Scrubby]

As they say the devil is in the details. It seem to me that drag shows should be legal as long as they're limited to adults in closed private areas. Having them in the streets or schools is a much different thing.

Literally nobody cares about adults doing drag for one another. It's weird, but nobody really gives a crap. Unfortunately the only place the left is interested in hosting drag events involves children and public spaces. Weird behavior though not surprising from the epstein party.

 

[St. Louis Hawk]

Literally nobody cares about adults doing drag for one another. It's weird, but nobody really gives a crap.

Well, except for the Texas legislature that passed the bill.

 

[SoProudNole]

As they say the devil is in the details. It seem to me that drag shows should be legal as long as they're limited to adults in closed private areas. Having them in the streets or schools is a much different thing.

Do all drag shows involve themes like you're going to a strip club?

 

[alaskanseminole]

Literally nobody cares about adults doing drag for one another. It's weird, but nobody really gives a crap.

I'm in this camp. I tend to draw the line when my ability to protect my children is removed/prevented. As long as I'm able to turn the channel or in this case, not attend, I'm a proponent of free choice. Whenever someone drops one of those perverted drag queen grinding in front of kids videos, I look at the parents, not the performers.

IMO, everything has context. Some dude wearing a Disney princess costume reading books to children in a library is of zero concern to me. Why? I won't be there. Now, if said queen is in a thong thrusting around the stage and there are kids there, that's on the parents. I already think the person is a little off in both scenarios, but I'm not going to get triggered over it. I'm not going to either.

I think I'll just drop this 3 keys to happiness in all the threads today. Maybe it will help at least one person today.

Facebook

www.facebook.com

 

[AndreWoolridgeB10MVP]

I'm in this camp. I tend to draw the line when my ability to protect my children is removed/prevented. As long as I'm able to turn the channel or in this case, not attend, I'm a proponent of free choice. Whenever someone drops one of those perverted drag queen grinding in front of kids videos, I look at the parents, not the performers.

IMO, everything has context. Some dude wearing a Disney princess costume reading books to children in a library is of zero concern to me. Why? I won't be there. Now, if said queen is in a thong thrusting around the stage and there are kids there, that's on the parents. I already think the person is a little off in both scenarios, but I'm not going to get triggered over it. I'm not going to either.

I think I'll just drop this 3 keys to happiness in all the threads today. Maybe it will help at least one person today.

Facebook

www.facebook.com

Is the first key, "Don't click on FB links?"

 

[RollingballofButcherKnives]

Literally nobody cares about adults doing drag for one another. It's weird, but nobody really gives a crap. Unfortunately the only place the left is interested in hosting drag events involves children and public spaces. Weird behavior though not surprising from the epstein party.

 

[Scrubby]

I'm in this camp. I tend to draw the line when my ability to protect my children is removed/prevented. As long as I'm able to turn the channel or in this case, not attend, I'm a proponent of free choice. Whenever someone drops one of those perverted drag queen grinding in front of kids videos, I look at the parents, not the performers.

IMO, everything has context. Some dude wearing a Disney princess costume reading books to children in a library is of zero concern to me. Why? I won't be there. Now, if said queen is in a thong thrusting around the stage and there are kids there, that's on the parents. I already think the person is a little off in both scenarios, but I'm not going to get triggered over it. I'm not going to either.

I think I'll just drop this 3 keys to happiness in all the threads today. Maybe it will help at least one person today.

Facebook

www.facebook.com

I generally agree with this take except I blame the parents AND the performer willing to grind sexually in the presence of children. Both are to blame and the child is being abused in that moment.

Adult drag, weird as it is, is totally above board imo. Couldn't care less what consenting adults do in private. Them needing to scream about the behavior in public does deserve to be mocked though.

 

[Scrubby]

It would make a lot more sense if you actually read the epstein files. Jeffrey outright coached democrats during congressional hearings. They read his questions verbatim and texted him live updates. Dems voted to NOT CENSURE the individual doing this. Meaning they outright CONDONE that behavior.

As I said, democrats are the epstein party. Always have been.

 

[RollingballofButcherKnives]

It would make a lot more sense if you actually read the epstein files. Jeffrey outright coached democrats during congressional hearings. They read his questions verbatim and texted him live updates. Dems voted to NOT CENSURE the individual doing this. Meaning they outright CONDONE that behavior.

As I said, democrats are the epstein party. Always have been.

Oh. Ok.