Toggle sidebar

Sandusky Appeal Hearing Article

R

RolexKong

Senior
Aug 15, 2025
635
543
93
Holy, schit, Frankie is testifying!!! That by itself is worth the price of admission!

 
Nittering Nabob

Nittering Nabob

All-Conference
Sep 17, 2024
3,419
3,233
113
Efejle said:
For Christ sake let it go
Click to expand...
Eff U. 🖕🤌 Lawyer Boy.

The truth, which we all desire for any fellow person, probably resides somewhere between the initial trial testimony provided by the questionable "victims" (many of whom might, or might not, have been previous clients of yours :cool:) and actual facts from this and other recanting "victims" is far more important.

Probably not for you....you've already been "paid".
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Michlion, Nits74, SkiSkiSki and 7 others
K

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
6,583
3,826
113
NoBareFeet said:
Do you not find it significant that a trial "victim" is recanting his testimony? Seems pretty significant to me.
Click to expand...
It shouldn't. There's false testimony in every trial on both sides. This also has zero impact on the other counts which is why anyone who read the article comprehends this isn't getting Sandusky a new trial.
We know the truth...he's a pedophile. Nothing else matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ilovewrestling
K

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
6,583
3,826
113
Alphalion75 said:
Explain
Click to expand...
Not sure why this needs explained but members of our fan base incorrectly believe that Sandusky getting a new trial would change how Joe is viewed. Joe handled things properly. Unless MM states he never advised Joe of a potential issue then the guilt or innocence of Sandusky remains irrelevant in the court of public opinion. People either accept Joe met his legal obligation (as he did) or they believe he should have done more due to his power and influence.
This isn't about Sandusky...never has been
 
  • Like
Reactions: Truthtelling
N

NoBareFeet

Senior
Oct 25, 2021
376
625
93
Efejle said:
Yes. Very significant. What about the other 53 victims?
Click to expand...
I sure don't remember there being that many at trial.

I remember Victim 1, who changed his story a million times, and whose therapist alleged in Victim 1's book that the Philadelphia Eagles were in on Sandusky's crimes. Hahaha, call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 2, who didn't even testify at trial and is on the record vehemently denying anything ever happened with Jerry. And the witness to the Victim 2 incident has since told several people he never witnessed sexual abuse. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 3, who initially claimed Jerry never did anything to him and told police "I hope he is found not guilty."

I remember Victim 4, who denied any inappropriate behavior by Sandusky, until investigators falsely told him that 9 other kids are alleging abuse.

I remember Victim 5. and if you believe his story, you would have to believe his abuse occurred in a locker room which no longer existed at the time of abuse. But I guess that's just details. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 6. He never even alleged sexual abuse. Yet Jerry was found to have sexually abused him. Odd.

I remember Victim 7. who when initially contacted by investigators praised Sandusky and the Second Mile and said nothing inappropriate ever happened to him. Then he underwent repressed memory therapy...call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 8. Actually, no I don't. He was never identified. A date was never given for the incident. And the "witness" never even testified. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 9, whose accounts are so laughably absurd you would have to be the most gullible person on the planet to believe them.

I remember Victim 10, who is now saying he made all of his allegations of abuse up, and Jerry did nothing to him.

Free Jerry.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: Psusports7, jp99FFPA, saturdaysarebetter and 16 others
Alphalion75

Alphalion75

All-Conference
Oct 24, 2001
15,164
4,299
113
KingLando said:
Not sure why this needs explained but members of our fan base incorrectly believe that Sandusky getting a new trial would change how Joe is viewed. Joe handled things properly. Unless MM states he never advised Joe of a potential issue then the guilt or innocence of Sandusky remains irrelevant in the court of public opinion. People either accept Joe met his legal obligation (as he did) or they believe he should have done more due to his power and influence.
This isn't about Sandusky...never has been
Click to expand...
I 100% agree with you that Joe handled this situation properly and what happens to Sandusky has nothing to do with Joe's legacy. However, you or I will never convince the others that Joe did the right thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roswelllion, creamery freak, Zenophile and 2 others
Alphalion75

Alphalion75

All-Conference
Oct 24, 2001
15,164
4,299
113
NoBareFeet said:
I sure don't remember there being that many at trial.

I remember Victim 1, who changed his story a million times, and whose therapist alleged in Victim 1's book that the Philadelphia Eagles were in on Sandusky's crimes. Hahaha, call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 2, who didn't even testify at trial and is on the record vehemently denying anything ever happened with Jerry. And the witness to the Victim 2 incident has since told several people he never witnessed sexual abuse. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 3, who initially claimed Jerry never did anything to him and told police "I hope he is found not guilty."

I remember Victim 4, who denied any inappropriate behavior by Sandusky, until investigators falsely told him that 9 other kids are alleging abuse.

I remember Victim 5. and if you believe his story, you would have to believe his abuse occurred in a locker room which no longer existed at the time of abuse. But I guess that's just details. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 6. He never even alleged sexual abuse. Yet Jerry was found to have sexually abused him. Odd.

I remember Victim 7. who when initially contacted by investigators praised Sandusky and the Second Mile and said nothing inappropriate ever happened to him. Then he underwent repressed memory therapy...call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 8. Actually, no I don't. He was never identified. A date was never given for the incident. And the "witness" never even testified. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 9, whose accounts are so laughably absurd you would have to be the most gullible person on the planet to believe them.

I remember Victim 10, who is now saying he made all of his allegations of abuse up, and Jerry did nothing to him.

Free Jerry.
Click to expand...
Very compelling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roswelllion
P

PSUFTG

All-Conference
Nov 1, 2021
2,538
3,780
113
Ever since 2011, there is one certainty in this entire affair:

Those who are the most ignorant, the least informed, and have the dumbest, most conflicted, most non-sensical, most "offensive to intelligence and reason" hot takes will always be:
The ones espousing those hot takes in the most obdurate, repetitive, obstinate, certain, absolute, and contradictory manner.

Some things never change.
Every bit as true today as it was 15 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marshall2323 and Zenophile
P

PSU-Dude

Freshman
Jul 25, 2015
47
70
13
KingLando said:
Not sure why this needs explained but members of our fan base incorrectly believe that Sandusky getting a new trial would change how Joe is viewed. Joe handled things properly. Unless MM states he never advised Joe of a potential issue then the guilt or innocence of Sandusky remains irrelevant in the court of public opinion. People either accept Joe met his legal obligation (as he did) or they believe he should have done more due to his power and influence.
This isn't about Sandusky...never has been
Click to expand...

You are FOS. I'll bet Sandusky is far more interested in getting out of jail than how Joe is viewed.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: KingLando
K

KingLando

All-Conference
Nov 29, 2021
6,583
3,826
113
Alphalion75 said:
I 100% agree with you that Joe handled this situation properly and what happens to Sandusky has nothing to do with Joe's legacy. However, you or I will never convince the others that Joe did the right thing.
Click to expand...
Nothing will
 
Alphalion75

Alphalion75

All-Conference
Oct 24, 2001
15,164
4,299
113
PSUFTG said:
Ever since 2011, there is one certainty in this entire affair:

Those who are the most ignorant, the least informed, and have the dumbest, most conflicted, most non-sensical, most "offensive to intelligence and reason" hot takes will always be:
The ones espousing those hot takes in the most obdurate, repetitive, obstinate, certain, absolute, and contradictory manner.

Some things never change.
Every bit as true today as it was 15 years ago.
Click to expand...
Which individuals are you referring to?
 
O

Open Mind 1

Sophomore
Dec 17, 2023
68
165
43
NoBareFeet said:
I sure don't remember there being that many at trial.

I remember Victim 1, who changed his story a million times, and whose therapist alleged in Victim 1's book that the Philadelphia Eagles were in on Sandusky's crimes. Hahaha, call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 2, who didn't even testify at trial and is on the record vehemently denying anything ever happened with Jerry. And the witness to the Victim 2 incident has since told several people he never witnessed sexual abuse. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 3, who initially claimed Jerry never did anything to him and told police "I hope he is found not guilty."

I remember Victim 4, who denied any inappropriate behavior by Sandusky, until investigators falsely told him that 9 other kids are alleging abuse.

I remember Victim 5. and if you believe his story, you would have to believe his abuse occurred in a locker room which no longer existed at the time of abuse. But I guess that's just details. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 6. He never even alleged sexual abuse. Yet Jerry was found to have sexually abused him. Odd.

I remember Victim 7. who when initially contacted by investigators praised Sandusky and the Second Mile and said nothing inappropriate ever happened to him. Then he underwent repressed memory therapy...call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 8. Actually, no I don't. He was never identified. A date was never given for the incident. And the "witness" never even testified. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 9, whose accounts are so laughably absurd you would have to be the most gullible person on the planet to believe them.

I remember Victim 10, who is now saying he made all of his allegations of abuse up, and Jerry did nothing to him.

Free Jerry.
Click to expand...
This ☝🏼
 
  • Haha
Reactions: KingLando
Marshall2323

Marshall2323

All-American
Aug 7, 2024
4,612
5,102
113
There are at least 5 subplots one should consider when addressing the Sandusky "Scandal."
1, The Corbett/Spanier issues
2. The significant incest between members of the BOT their families and corporations
3. McQueary was completely compromised
4. The Surma Family's desire to "destroy the rat."
5. Perhaps the biggest circumstance to overcome, fortunes were made (not just by the claimants) but lawyers and business people who sold investments and big ticket items to the neo rich (and stupid).

To add to the accuser who now recants:
Prosecutors were censured
Judges were removed, reassigned and retired
PSU's general counsel was sanctioned
Corbett was retired by citizens of The Commonwealth
Jonelle Eshbach couldn't get elected dog catcher
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psusports7, doctornick, FHSPSU67 and 8 others
O

Open Mind 1

Sophomore
Dec 17, 2023
68
165
43
NoBareFeet said:
I sure don't remember there being that many at trial.

I remember Victim 1, who changed his story a million times, and whose therapist alleged in Victim 1's book that the Philadelphia Eagles were in on Sandusky's crimes. Hahaha, call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 2, who didn't even testify at trial and is on the record vehemently denying anything ever happened with Jerry. And the witness to the Victim 2 incident has since told several people he never witnessed sexual abuse. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 3, who initially claimed Jerry never did anything to him and told police "I hope he is found not guilty."

I remember Victim 4, who denied any inappropriate behavior by Sandusky, until investigators falsely told him that 9 other kids are alleging abuse.

I remember Victim 5. and if you believe his story, you would have to believe his abuse occurred in a locker room which no longer existed at the time of abuse. But I guess that's just details. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 6. He never even alleged sexual abuse. Yet Jerry was found to have sexually abused him. Odd.

I remember Victim 7. who when initially contacted by investigators praised Sandusky and the Second Mile and said nothing inappropriate ever happened to him. Then he underwent repressed memory therapy...call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 8. Actually, no I don't. He was never identified. A date was never given for the incident. And the "witness" never even testified. Call me skeptical.

I remember Victim 9, whose accounts are so laughably absurd you would have to be the most gullible person on the planet to believe them.

I remember Victim 10, who is now saying he made all of his allegations of abuse up, and Jerry did nothing to him.

Free Jerry.
Click to expand...
Bump x 1000
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Michlion, KingLando and Knickslions69
You must log in or register to reply here.
BWI

Latest

  1. 01 BWI Projecting Penn State's injury report heading into the Nittany Lions' season opener
  2. 02 BWI Penn State - Marshall visitor list features several recruits who could earn an offer
  3. 03 BWI Penn State position battles updates: Taylor Mouser on the RB2 job, receiver rotation, and more before Marshall
  4. 04 BWI Live updates: Matt Campbell weekly press conference
  5. 05 BWI Penn State's Week One Scouting Report: The Marshall Offense Begins And Ends With Carlos Del Rio-Wilson
Top Bottom