First, Surace seems like a good kid and feel bad for him.
That being said, the usual anti GS posters who declare that GS did not develop Surace appear off point. In all times we have seen him (limited), he has appeared well schooled and prepared. BUT as I have pointed out from the first spring game till now, he appears smaller and less athletic than expected. Even a podcast today indicated Lonergan looked better throwing. He just appears bigger and more athletic. While it may have bene close, Lonergan may be the more physically gifted and getting a shot because of that and his ball secuirty at BC. So the lack of development appears waaaay off base.
My guess is Surace gets some shots-either in big wins or losses-and we will see if he has that moxie. I mentioned Dodd some time back and he wasnt one to wow in green shirt practice days, but was a game day player. Surace hasnt had the chance to show that and perhaps he can be. I think this is athleticism, upside, expereince and ball secuity history-and NOT develeopmnet.
That being said, the usual anti GS posters who declare that GS did not develop Surace appear off point. In all times we have seen him (limited), he has appeared well schooled and prepared. BUT as I have pointed out from the first spring game till now, he appears smaller and less athletic than expected. Even a podcast today indicated Lonergan looked better throwing. He just appears bigger and more athletic. While it may have bene close, Lonergan may be the more physically gifted and getting a shot because of that and his ball secuirty at BC. So the lack of development appears waaaay off base.
My guess is Surace gets some shots-either in big wins or losses-and we will see if he has that moxie. I mentioned Dodd some time back and he wasnt one to wow in green shirt practice days, but was a game day player. Surace hasnt had the chance to show that and perhaps he can be. I think this is athleticism, upside, expereince and ball secuity history-and NOT develeopmnet.