News today

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
6,304
7,801
113
Texas is a much better state than California.

James Talarico will have nothing to do with governing Texas. He’s going to Washington and not Austin.

Dumbcoach strikes again!!!
Dumbcoaxh? Talarico will remain in Texas. He ain’t going to Washington. Amuses me that you still believe much like you believe in Ann Selzer being honest.

Senators don’t impact their state? Interesting. I recall begrudgingly supporting McCain before he died as he promised to repeal Obamacare. Well, he won, and while not as offensive as the theft of a pen, he was the decisive vote to KEEP that nightmare and the impact is still felt. The McCain machine continues to support Democrat loons in Arizona. No impact on Texas? A very dumb take.

I guess you loved the unproven and highly defective covid vax. So, you may as well vote to introduce a liberal cancer (Talarico) into Texas believing it will be easy to get rid of it. Just take a look at Maine, Georgia, Montana, and Arizona current and recent senators - it is not always routine getting rid of the opposition.
 
Last edited:

AzIllini

All-Conference
Apr 26, 2003
2,498
1,130
78
Not about polynames or the expert cattle rancher, but I recall mentioning getting carryout early and often in Illnois during Covid. People thought I was awful for supporting local businesses and local workers during the time the real king, Lord Pritzker, had the state locked down tight, because I could catch and spread Covid.
I was similar and got carryout but am too cheap to pay for delivery.

Now in my area, DoorDash has remote delivery "buggies" that look like baby carriages that travel the bike lanes on the major roads. It is an interesting use of technology.

1787496087415.png
 

Semi-elite R2R athlete

All-American
Sep 13, 2008
4,116
9,235
113
Not about polynames or the expert cattle rancher, but I recall mentioning getting carryout early and often in Illnois during Covid. People thought I was awful for supporting local businesses and local workers during the time the real king, Lord Pritzker, had the state locked down tight, because I could catch and spread Covid.
And then “bent over for Joe” and got the dreaded death jab..
 

Semi-elite R2R athlete

All-American
Sep 13, 2008
4,116
9,235
113
Dumbcoaxh? Talarico will remain in Texas. He ain’t going to Washington. Amuses me that you still believe much like you believe in Ann Selzer being left.

Senators don’t impact their state? Interesting. I recall begrudgingly supporting McCain before he died as he promised to repeal Obamacare. Well, he won, and while not as offensive as the theft of a pen, he was the decisive vote to KEEP that nightmare and the impact is still felt. The McCain machine continues to support Democrat loons in Arizona. No impact on Texas? A very dumb take.

I guess you loved the unproven and highly defective covid vax. So, you may as well vote to introduce a liberal cancer (Talarico) into Texas believing it will be easy to get rid of it. Just take a look at Maine, Georgia, Montana, and Arizona current and recent senators - it is not always routine getting rid of the opposition.
I will give this douche some credit. He’s an expert at creating ways to insert the death jab into every single subject.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dtrain79

Semi-elite R2R athlete

All-American
Sep 13, 2008
4,116
9,235
113


As Trump continues to deteriorate and become more and more embarrassing, the MAGA retards just dig their heels in further. Imagine what this is going to look like in another 2 years.

Maybe we should stop electing corrupt cognitively impaired boomers.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dtrain79

ILisBest

All-American
Jun 16, 2007
7,782
5,975
113
Texas is a much better state than California.

James Talarico will have nothing to do with governing Texas. He’s going to Washington and not Austin.

Dumbcoach strikes again!!!
Federal policy that will be voted on by JT can affect Texas as it is a state governed by both state and federal law. Not a great look to call someone dumb that knew this to be true.
 

rillaman

Heisman
May 10, 2009
18,631
11,823
113
Until people that agree with Kanter stop attending and watching games, the nonsense will continue.

Sharing endless WNBA social media content is good for the league. Might want to stop doing that too.

People should spend more time highlighting that there are male criminals being put in female prisons. That’s something that is actually happening.
 
  • Love
Reactions: dtrain79

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
6,304
7,801
113
Until people that agree with Kanter stop attending and watching games, the nonsense will continue.
Met a super nice WNBA player at a Benihana table a year ago. Notably, she could really eat (PF), was very respectful and straight as bell. Kind of a tough life as both her and her boyfriend played pro ball in Asia in winter (apart).

it is too bad the idiots outnumber or drown out the ones trying to make a living.

With this league being a total joke, C Clark should barnstorm the country with her version of the Savannah Bananas of Globetrotters. The market is there and she would kill it
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: BigWill and Uncoach

AzIllini

All-Conference
Apr 26, 2003
2,498
1,130
78
Until people that agree with Kanter stop attending and watching games, the nonsense will continue.
It is kinda sad. Apparently Kanter was sitting courtside and cheering for Sophie and says this happened:

"I was cheering for my friend Sophie because when she shot that three, I put my hands in the air," Freedom said. "A couple possessions later, she (Chicago Sky player Natasha Cloud) came back and said, ‘She’s not gonna sleep with you.’ And I was shocked. I was like, ‘Listen, I’m not trying to sleep with her. I think she’s awesome. She’s a good friend.’ But I think it has a lot to do with my shirt.

It appears Cloud started yelling at him, he stood up and potentially stepped on the court and security decided to remove him.

Just another afternoon in the WNBA.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: BigWill and Uncoach

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,757
27,687
113
Federal policy that will be voted on by JT can affect Texas as it is a state governed by both state and federal law. Not a great look to call someone dumb that knew this to be true.

OMG ... federal law affects Texas exactly the same AS IT IMPACTS THE OTHER 50 STATES. It cannot make Texas more or less attractive than California, because it impacts them equally. (There's some ways this isn't 100% correct, but it usually involves federal spending being directed to the state, so there's no reason to assume Paxton or Talarico would be "better" here)

I thought you geniuses understood politics. You tell us you do all the time. But when we actually get to the details, you guys are completely lost.

Bottom line, James Talarico in the Senate will not impact Texas vis-a-vis competitiveness/attractiveness with California, because they are in a national legislature. Bemusingly, this is why the "Ted Cruz went to Mexico during the power outage" thing was so laughable. What was Teddy F***ing Cruz going to do about a matter that was a function of state governance?
 

Uncoach

Heisman
Dec 8, 2011
7,268
10,697
113
Until people that agree with Kanter stop attending and watching games, the nonsense will continue.
Or 50-100 fans per game show up in apparel supporting Cunningham/XX/XY. They can’t kick everyone out. I’m not sure either method would stop the nonsense. The ideology was in them before they got exposed. I’m also not sure the organization/people subsidizing the wnba actually want it to be self-supporting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjfleck6

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,757
27,687
113
I'm old enough to remember that Big Swill dedicated three years of his life to telling me the crime rate wasn't going down.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! Great job Big Swill ... you got another one wrong ... must be something to do with your only actual argument being "TDS."

Posting in two parts.

Summarizing a Historic 2025 Crime Report with Charts & Tables​

Jeff Asher
Aug 24, 2026



The FBI released its 2025 Crime in the United States report on a Friday afternoon which wasn’t there fault but also was super great for getting a ton of attention on the fact that murder fell at the fastest pace ever recorded to the lowest rate recorded since the FBI started its modern estimates.
Thanks for reading Jeff-alytics! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

It wasn’t just the US murder rate that has reached a historic low though as clearly seen in the below table of every crime type.


There’s another way to visualize how far things have come though — bar charts. I think it is helpful to look at the crimes that have fallen the most over the last few years and truly see the change through the magic of bar charts. To do that, I highlighted 2025 as well as the last time each crime’s rate was as low as it was in 2025.
Here’s violent crime, lowest since 1968:


The murder rate, lowest since at least 1960:


Robbery, also the lowest since at least 1960:


The property crime, lowest since at least 1960:


The burglary rate, lowest since at least 1960:


The lowest theft rate since 1962:


And the lowest motor vehicle theft rate since 1961:
 

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,757
27,687
113
All available evidence points to another large drop in nearly every crime type occurring in 2026. The recently released Crime Index sample of 590 agencies has murder down 17 percent, violent crime down 6 percent and property crime down 10 percent through June 2026.



This year is on track to be the fourth straight year with a double-digit percentage point drop in murder. It may not set a new record, but the drop in murder this year will likely exceed any year prior to 2023 in terms of the largest drop in murders from one year to the next.



Finally, I have to point out that clearance rates for murder, robbery and burglary were the highest in decades. The robbery clearance rate interests me a ton given that the 1960s clearance rates aren’t particularly reliable.



Summing things up, I would say that 2023, 2024 and 2025 were all historic in terms of declining crime and 2026 is looking like it will be another historic year. Sometimes all it takes to see history is a couple of bar charts (with some tables sprinkled in).
 
  • Like
Reactions: rillaman

Uncoach

Heisman
Dec 8, 2011
7,268
10,697
113
Federal policy that will be voted on by JT can affect Texas as it is a state governed by both state and federal law. Not a great look to call someone dumb that knew this to be true.
Yes. It’s crazy to think someone who believes he has such supreme knowledge and brainpower compared to all others does not understand how the constitution of Congress impacts states.
 

Uncoach

Heisman
Dec 8, 2011
7,268
10,697
113
Met a super nice WNBA player at a Benihana table a year ago. Notably, she could really eat (PF), was very respectful and straight as bell. Kind of a tough life as both her and her boyfriend played pro ball in Asia in winter (apart).

it is too bad the idiots outnumber or drown out the ones trying to make a living.

With this league being a total joke, C Clark should barnstorm the country with her version of the Savannah Bananas of Globetrotters. The market is there and she would kill it
Not enough people have entrepreneurial vision and even when they do, they have no idea how to execute the plan. Some people simply have a fear of breaking away from what they know. Perhaps Clark doesn’t have that vision, but she would be able to get plenty of financial backing to start her own league. And you may have a better idea yet in a women’s version of the Globetrotters/Savannah Bananas.
 

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
6,304
7,801
113
It is kinda sad. Apparently Kanter was sitting courtside and cheering for Sophie and says this happened:

"I was cheering for my friend Sophie because when she shot that three, I put my hands in the air," Freedom said. "A couple possessions later, she (Chicago Sky player Natasha Cloud) came back and said, ‘She’s not gonna sleep with you.’ And I was shocked. I was like, ‘Listen, I’m not trying to sleep with her. I think she’s awesome. She’s a good friend.’ But I think it has a lot to do with my shirt.

It appears Cloud started yelling at him, he stood up and potentially stepped on the court and security decided to remove him.

Just another afternoon in the WNBA.
Good post, but Cloud was yelling at “her”.
 

tjfleck6

All-American
Apr 19, 2008
6,304
7,801
113
Not enough people have entrepreneurial vision and even when they do, they have no idea how to execute the plan. Some people simply have a fear of breaking away from what they know. Perhaps Clark doesn’t have that vision, but she would be able to get plenty of financial backing to start her own league. And you may have a better idea yet in a women’s version of the Globetrotters/Savannah Bananas.
She just needs an agent who can negotiate a massive lump sum and a percentage. She is Red Grange December 1925. Attendance without her demonstrates that.
 

ILisBest

All-American
Jun 16, 2007
7,782
5,975
113
Sharing endless WNBA social media content is good for the league. Might want to stop doing that too.

People should spend more time highlighting that there are male criminals being put in female prisons. That’s something that is actually happening.
I wonder if Dtrain knows JT would definitely vote for that to happen if he represents Texas in congress. Maybe you could tell him as he loved your post. Must be important to him 🤷‍♂️
 

ILisBest

All-American
Jun 16, 2007
7,782
5,975
113
Met a super nice WNBA player at a Benihana table a year ago. Notably, she could really eat (PF), was very respectful and straight as bell. Kind of a tough life as both her and her boyfriend played pro ball in Asia in winter (apart).

it is too bad the idiots outnumber or drown out the ones trying to make a living.

With this league being a total joke, C Clark should barnstorm the country with her version of the Savannah Bananas of Globetrotters. The market is there and she would kill it
She appears to be a woke knucklehead also. I have zero sympathy for her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjfleck6

ILisBest

All-American
Jun 16, 2007
7,782
5,975
113
OMG ... federal law affects Texas exactly the same AS IT IMPACTS THE OTHER 50 STATES. It cannot make Texas more or less attractive than California, because it impacts them equally. (There's some ways this isn't 100% correct, but it usually involves federal spending being directed to the state, so there's no reason to assume Paxton or Talarico would be "better" here)

I thought you geniuses understood politics. You tell us you do all the time. But when we actually get to the details, you guys are completely lost.

Bottom line, James Talarico in the Senate will not impact Texas vis-a-vis competitiveness/attractiveness with California, because they are in a national legislature. Bemusingly, this is why the "Ted Cruz went to Mexico during the power outage" thing was so laughable. What was Teddy F***ing Cruz going to do about a matter that was a function of state governance?
YOU CAN YELL ALL YOU WANT, but it doesn't change the fact you posted this, "James Talarico will have nothing to do with governing Texas"

It is just not true. I assume you briefly forgot he can shape policy for Texas on a federal level.
 

ILisBest

All-American
Jun 16, 2007
7,782
5,975
113
Or 50-100 fans per game show up in apparel supporting Cunningham/XX/XY. They can’t kick everyone out. I’m not sure either method would stop the nonsense. The ideology was in them before they got exposed. I’m also not sure the organization/people subsidizing the wnba actually want it to be self-supporting.
The WNBA is a sad attempt to prop up a project that there is not a winning market for. Women around the US will support drama like crazy including the Kardashians and Housewife shows. I am guessing the WNBA is probably up in attendance over this idiocy. I will stay in the lane of not caring. Kanter and Royce did earn a follow from me though:)
 

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,757
27,687
113
YOU CAN YELL ALL YOU WANT, but it doesn't change the fact you posted this, "James Talarico will have nothing to do with governing Texas"

It is just not true. I assume you briefly forgot he can shape policy for Texas on a federal level.

Yes, I do not consider federal legislators people who govern states. I think it's profoundly idiotic and disingenuous to try and claim otherwise. So correct, James Talarico will have nothing to do with governing Texas. Almost nothing specific to Texas will occur because Talarico is in the Senate (other than him being elected from Texas). Individuals in Texas are impacted by federal law, of course.

This is basic federalism to me. (You would never something like "James Talarico governs North Dakota," I think we can agree on that.)

I realize that politics is your identity, and you can't handle the thought of someone you perceive as "to the right" betraying the GOP. I on the other hand can't believe what the GOP currently is or that intelligent people defend it.

By the way, do you think I don't understand what the Senate is? That's your argument. That I don't know the Senate impacts federal policy. It's obvious in the context of the discussion - where I specifically address why Talarico impacts California and Texas equivalently - the point I am making. (Btw, you have a few gotchas as to where my point isn't 100% accurate ... but you aren't making them, I am.)

I could go on about how this is a good example of how politics has become a substitute for religion for many folks. Effectively the view is that we are electing something akin to priests, and having a Dem priest attached to Texas is particularly galling (much moreso than California).
 
Last edited:

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,757
27,687
113
I wonder if Dtrain knows JT would definitely vote for that to happen if he represents Texas in congress. Maybe you could tell him as he loved your post. Must be important to him 🤷‍♂️

Would he definitely vote for that? I mean, it's bad, but it's also the kind of issue Dems don't want to touch because it's terrible for them. Putting male prisoners in female prisons is not a winning electoral issue.

Best ... I stopped being a Republican in 2023 when it became apparent that Trump was being resurrected by a great majority of the GOP. I just refuse to affiliate with that. My ideology as to what constitutes good governance didn't change even a single bit, but I just don't have much favorability towards GOP partisanship.

I mean, I told you this in person before Trump got nominated again lol. Maybe you thought I was lying.
 

ILisBest

All-American
Jun 16, 2007
7,782
5,975
113
Yes, I do not consider federal legislators people who govern states. I think it's profoundly idiotic and disingenuous to try and claim otherwise. So correct, James Talarico will have nothing to do with governing Texas. Almost nothing specific to Texas will occur because Talarico is in the Senate (other than him being elected from Texas). Individuals in Texas are impacted by federal law, of course.

This is basic federalism to me. (You would never something like "James Talarico governs North Dakota," I think we can agree on that.)

I realize that politics is your identity, and you can't handle the thought of someone you perceive as "to the right" betraying the GOP. I on the other hand can't believe what the GOP currently is or that intelligent people defend it.

By the way, do you think I don't understand what the Senate is? That's your argument. That I don't know the Senate impacts federal policy. It's obvious in the context of the discussion - where I specifically address why Talarico impacts California and Texas equivalently - the point I am making. (Btw, you have a few gotchas as to where my point isn't 100% accurate ... but you aren't making them, I am.)

I could go on about how this is a good example of how politics has become a substitute for religion for many folks. Effectively the view is that we are electing something akin to priests, and having a Dem priest attached to Texas is particularly galling (much moreso than California).
You don't have to admit you misstated something, but it would be easier.
 

ILisBest

All-American
Jun 16, 2007
7,782
5,975
113
Would he definitely vote for that? I mean, it's bad, but it's also the kind of issue Dems don't want to touch because it's terrible for them. Putting male prisoners in female prisons is not a winning electoral issue.

Best ... I stopped being a Republican in 2023 when it became apparent that Trump was being resurrected by a great majority of the GOP. I just refuse to affiliate with that. My ideology as to what constitutes good governance didn't change even a single bit, but I just don't have much favorability towards GOP partisanship.

I mean, I told you this in person before Trump got nominated again lol. Maybe you thought I was lying.
You did tell me that, but you also identify way more with R policy. That is what makes it hard for a person like me to wrap my head around what you said.

JT would also like this little dog. I mean, it says it is a dog.

 
  • Like
Reactions: tjfleck6

AzIllini

All-Conference
Apr 26, 2003
2,498
1,130
78
I feel strongly about this, but I don't vote in Texas.

1) If elected, Talarico will support the Dem's next Ketanji Brown Jackson. She is unqualified and he will follow the herd. Maybe he can vote for 2 replacements or even to pack the Supreme Court.
2) He says he is for a big welcome mat in the US for immigrants. He tries to say he also is for secure borders but it is careful words chosen by his PR consultants. Has Texas got enough room for millions more now legal immigrants, plus Californians?
3) He will vote with the herd to put DEI in the military and overturn merit
4) He will vote with the herd for anything else the leadership tells them to, just look at the 2 Dem moderate senators in AZ. They vote the party line.
 

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,757
27,687
113
You don't have to admit you misstated something, but it would be easier.

I didn't mis-state anything. You are trying to create an interpretation that obscures what I thought was an obvious point. Talarico/Paxton is a national office, and Texas has surged because its state-level policy is largely successful. The whole discussion revolved around a comparison between states themselves.

I get the narrative that wants Texas voters to view Paxton/Talarico as if it were a Governor and AG race, one which is particularly salient on the right. It's just not one.

It would probably be preferable for Texas to have Talarico/Paxton running for Insurance Commissioner or something. Senate is an important job in national politics (only 100 Senators). But let's be real here, it's far more important for Texas' future who wins the Governor race and probably the LG/AG races.
 
Last edited:

dtrain79

Heisman
Jul 13, 2006
48,757
27,687
113
I feel strongly about this, but I don't vote in Texas.

1) If elected, Talarico will support the Dem's next Ketanji Brown Jackson. She is unqualified and he will follow the herd. Maybe he can vote for 2 replacements or even to pack the Supreme Court.
2) He says he is for a big welcome mat in the US for immigrants. He tries to say he also is for secure borders but it is careful words chosen by his PR consultants. Has Texas got enough room for millions more now legal immigrants, plus Californians?
3) He will vote with the herd to put DEI in the military and overturn merit
4) He will vote with the herd for anything else the leadership tells them to, just look at the 2 Dem moderate senators in AZ. They vote the party line.

There are tons of "party reasons" to vote for Paxton over Talarico. I don't sit around and argue that there aren't. The Supreme Court is one, the fact that both parties don't have much dissent when their team goes too far right or left is another, you could add plenty more.

I am going to quibble a bit here. Texas has benefitted tremendously on the economic front from immigration (including illegal immigration). Who do you think is building houses/taking care of lawns/cleaning houses/cooking food/so on in Texas (and Arizona)?

There's a long debate to be had about immigration, the best system. But immigration is definitely a major part of the economic rise of the Southwest.
 
Orange and Blue News

Latest

  1. 01 Orange & Blue News Illinois offers Rivals Top 10 forward Bentley Lusakueno
  2. 02 Orange & Blue News The 3-2-1: Illinois football closes fall camp with questions still to answer
  3. 03 Rivals QB Owen Herrick sets four visits, who are the contenders?
  4. 04 Orange & Blue News High schools: Soren Fifer, Illini recruits open 2026 season
  5. 05 Orange & Blue News 75% OFF deal extended! Join Orange and Blue News as Fighting Illini football kicks off